fkie_cve-2025-38386
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-25 13:15
Modified
2025-07-25 15:29
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPICA: Refuse to evaluate a method if arguments are missing
As reported in [1], a platform firmware update that increased the number
of method parameters and forgot to update a least one of its callers,
caused ACPICA to crash due to use-after-free.
Since this a result of a clear AML issue that arguably cannot be fixed
up by the interpreter (it cannot produce missing data out of thin air),
address it by making ACPICA refuse to evaluate a method if the caller
attempts to pass fewer arguments than expected to it.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nACPICA: Refuse to evaluate a method if arguments are missing\n\nAs reported in [1], a platform firmware update that increased the number\nof method parameters and forgot to update a least one of its callers,\ncaused ACPICA to crash due to use-after-free.\n\nSince this a result of a clear AML issue that arguably cannot be fixed\nup by the interpreter (it cannot produce missing data out of thin air),\naddress it by making ACPICA refuse to evaluate a method if the caller\nattempts to pass fewer arguments than expected to it."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ACPICA: Negativa a evaluar un m\u00e9todo si faltan argumentos. Como se inform\u00f3 en [1], una actualizaci\u00f3n de firmware de la plataforma que aument\u00f3 el n\u00famero de par\u00e1metros del m\u00e9todo y olvid\u00f3 actualizar al menos uno de sus llamadores provoc\u00f3 el bloqueo de ACPICA debido al use-after-free. Dado que esto se debe a un claro problema de AML que posiblemente no pueda ser solucionado por el int\u00e9rprete (no puede generar datos faltantes de la nada), se debe solucionar haciendo que ACPICA se niegue a evaluar un m\u00e9todo si el llamante intenta pasarle menos argumentos de los esperados."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-38386",
"lastModified": "2025-07-25T15:29:19.837",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-07-25T13:15:27.877",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18ff4ed6a33a7e3f2097710eacc96bea7696e803"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2219e49857ffd6aea1b1ca5214d3270f84623a16"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4305d936abde795c2ef6ba916de8f00a50f64d2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fcab2791543924d438e7fa49276d0998b0a069f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab1e8491c19eb2ea0fda81ef28e841c7cb6399f5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b49d224d1830c46e20adce2a239c454cdab426f1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9e4da550ae196132b990bd77ed3d8f2d9747f87"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d547779e72cea9865b732cd45393c4cd02b3598e"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…