fkie_cve-2025-32094
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-08-07 05:15
Modified
2025-08-07 21:26
Severity ?
4.0 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
An issue was discovered in Akamai Ghost, as used for the Akamai CDN platform before 2025-03-26. Under certain circumstances, a client making an HTTP/1.x OPTIONS request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header, and using obsolete line folding, can lead to a discrepancy in how two in-path Akamai servers interpret the request, allowing an attacker to smuggle a second request in the original request body.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/100
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.akamai.com/blog/security/cve-2025-32094-http-request-smuggling
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.blackhat.com/us-25/briefings/schedule/#http1-must-die-the-desync-endgame-45103
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#name-obsolete-line-folding
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An issue was discovered in Akamai Ghost, as used for the Akamai CDN platform before 2025-03-26. Under certain circumstances, a client making an HTTP/1.x OPTIONS request with an \"Expect: 100-continue\" header, and using obsolete line folding, can lead to a discrepancy in how two in-path Akamai servers interpret the request, allowing an attacker to smuggle a second request in the original request body."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se detect\u00f3 un problema en Akamai Ghost, utilizado en la plataforma CDN de Akamai antes del 26/03/2025. En determinadas circunstancias, un cliente que realiza una solicitud HTTP/1.x OPTIONS con un encabezado \"Expect: 100-continue\" y utiliza un plegado de l\u00ednea obsoleto, puede generar una discrepancia en la interpretaci\u00f3n de la solicitud por parte de dos servidores Akamai en la ruta, lo que permite a un atacante introducir una segunda solicitud en el cuerpo original."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-32094",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-07T21:26:37.453",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.0,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "cve@mitre.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-08-07T05:15:45.667",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/100"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.akamai.com/blog/security/cve-2025-32094-http-request-smuggling"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/us-25/briefings/schedule/#http1-must-die-the-desync-endgame-45103"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#name-obsolete-line-folding"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-444"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.