fkie_cve-2025-0752
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-28 10:15
Modified
2025-07-31 18:29
Severity ?
6.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0752Vendor Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339115Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat openshift_service_mesh 2.5.6
redhat openshift_service_mesh 2.6.3


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_service_mesh:2.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "888B4C9D-0B35-45BC-9F6D-0C83BC1F14B1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_service_mesh:2.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6129D644-AA42-4E25-82E4-053613874178",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 y 2.5.6. Es posible que se produzcan ataques de evasi\u00f3n de limitadores de velocidad, de control de acceso, de agotamiento de CPU y memoria y de repetici\u00f3n debido al encabezado HTTP desinfecci\u00f3n incorrecto en Envoy."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-0752",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-31T18:29:53.110",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 6.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-28T10:15:09.493",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0752"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339115"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-444"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.