GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2024-57595

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-01-27 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:13
Summary
DLINK DIR-825 REVB 2.03 devices have an OS command injection vulnerability in the CGl interface apc_client_pin.cgi, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the parameter "wps_pin" passed to the apc_client_pin.cgi binary through a POST request.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "DLINK DIR-825 REVB 2.03 devices have an OS command injection vulnerability in the CGl interface apc_client_pin.cgi, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the parameter \"wps_pin\" passed to the apc_client_pin.cgi binary through a POST request."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los dispositivos DLINK DIR-825 REVB 2.03 tienen una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n de comandos del sistema operativo en la interfaz CGl apc_client_pin.cgi, que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro \"wps_pin\" pasado al binario apc_client_pin.cgi mediante una solicitud POST."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-57595",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:13:44.150",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2024-57595",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-01-27T15:29:53.788040Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-01-27T15:15:11.580",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdaJea/IOT_vuln_1/blob/master/DIR825/wps_pin.md"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-78"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…