fkie_cve-2024-5642
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-06-27 21:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:48
Severity ?
Summary
CPython 3.9 and earlier doesn't disallow configuring an empty list ("[]") for SSLContext.set_npn_protocols() which is an invalid value for the underlying OpenSSL API. This results in a buffer over-read when NPN is used (see CVE-2024-5535 for OpenSSL). This vulnerability is of low severity due to NPN being not widely used and specifying an empty list likely being uncommon in-practice (typically a protocol name would be configured).
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CPython 3.9 and earlier doesn\u0027t disallow configuring an empty list (\"[]\") for SSLContext.set_npn_protocols() which is an invalid value for the underlying OpenSSL API. This results in a buffer over-read when NPN is used (see CVE-2024-5535 for OpenSSL). This vulnerability is of low severity due to NPN being not widely used and specifying an empty list likely being uncommon in-practice (typically a protocol name would be configured)." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "CPython 3.9 y versiones anteriores no permiten la configuraci\u00f3n de una lista vac\u00eda (\"[]\") para SSLContext.set_npn_protocols(), que es un valor no v\u00e1lido para la API OpenSSL subyacente. Esto da como resultado una lectura excesiva del b\u00fafer cuando se utiliza NPN (consulte CVE-2024-5535 para OpenSSL). Esta vulnerabilidad es de baja gravedad debido a que NPN no se usa ampliamente y especificar una lista vac\u00eda probablemente sea poco com\u00fan en la pr\u00e1ctica (normalmente se configurar\u00eda un nombre de protocolo)." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-5642", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:48:04.713", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "LOW", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 2.5, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-06-27T21:15:16.070", "references": [ { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/39258d3595300bc7b952854c915f63ae2d4b9c3e" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/121227" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23014" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://jbp.io/2024/06/27/cve-2024-5535-openssl-memory-safety.html" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/PLP2JI3PJY33YG6P5BZYSSNU66HASXBQ/" }, { "source": "cna@python.org", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0005/" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/39258d3595300bc7b952854c915f63ae2d4b9c3e" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/121227" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23014" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://jbp.io/2024/06/27/cve-2024-5535-openssl-memory-safety.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/PLP2JI3PJY33YG6P5BZYSSNU66HASXBQ/" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0005/" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cna@python.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…