FKIE_CVE-2024-54435

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-12-16 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:10
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thomas Hoefter Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter onlywire-multi-autosubmitter allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter: from n/a through <= 1.2.4.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "onlywire-multi-autosubmitter",
          "product": "Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter",
          "vendor": "Thomas Hoefter",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.2.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thomas Hoefter Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter onlywire-multi-autosubmitter allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter: from n/a through \u003c= 1.2.4."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) en Thomas Hoefter Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter permite XSS almacenado. Este problema afecta a Onlywire Multi Autosubmitter: desde n/a hasta 1.2.4."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-54435",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:10:19.440",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2024-54435",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2024-12-16T19:38:17.228122Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-12-16T15:15:22.293",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/onlywire-multi-autosubmitter/vulnerability/wordpress-onlywire-multi-autosubmitter-plugin-1-2-4-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…