fkie_cve-2022-49208
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-26 07:00
Modified
2025-03-18 20:11
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/irdma: Prevent some integer underflows My static checker complains that: drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ctrl.c:3605 irdma_sc_ceq_init() warn: can subtract underflow 'info->dev->hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs'? It appears that "info->dev->hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs" comes from the firmware in irdma_sc_parse_fpm_query_buf() so, yes, there is a chance that it could be zero. Even if we trust the firmware, it's easy enough to change the condition just as a hardenning measure.
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f6dbb819dfc1a35bcb8b709b5c83a3ea8beff75Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7340c3675d7ac946f4019b84cd7c64ed542dfe4cPatch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d52dab6e03550f9c97121b0c11c0a3ed78ee76a4Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f21056f15bbeacab7b4b87af232f5599d1f2bff1Patch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "FB1C7FD1-C89E-4955-B265-456A9F757302",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.33",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "20C43679-0439-405A-B97F-685BEE50613B",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.16.19",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "210C679C-CF84-44A3-8939-E629C87E54BF",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.17.2",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.17",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/irdma: Prevent some integer underflows\n\nMy static checker complains that:\n\n    drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ctrl.c:3605 irdma_sc_ceq_init()\n    warn: can subtract underflow \u0027info-\u003edev-\u003ehmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs\u0027?\n\nIt appears that \"info-\u003edev-\u003ehmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs\" comes from the firmware\nin irdma_sc_parse_fpm_query_buf() so, yes, there is a chance that it could\nbe zero.  Even if we trust the firmware, it\u0027s easy enough to change the\ncondition just as a hardenning measure."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: RDMA/irdma: Evitar algunos desbordamientos de enteros Mi verificador est\u00e1tico se queja de que: drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ctrl.c:3605 irdma_sc_ceq_init() warn: can subtract underflow \u0027info-\u0026gt;dev-\u0026gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs\u0027? Parece que \"info-\u0026gt;dev-\u0026gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs\" proviene del firmware en irdma_sc_parse_fpm_query_buf() as\u00ed que, s\u00ed, existe la posibilidad de que sea cero. Incluso si confiamos en el firmware, es bastante f\u00e1cil cambiar la condici\u00f3n como una medida de endurecimiento."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-49208",
  "lastModified": "2025-03-18T20:11:17.900",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-02-26T07:00:57.910",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f6dbb819dfc1a35bcb8b709b5c83a3ea8beff75"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7340c3675d7ac946f4019b84cd7c64ed542dfe4c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d52dab6e03550f9c97121b0c11c0a3ed78ee76a4"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f21056f15bbeacab7b4b87af232f5599d1f2bff1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-191"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.