fkie_cve-2020-1710
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2020-09-16 15:15
Modified
2024-11-21 05:11
Severity ?
Summary
The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jboss_data_grid | - | |
| redhat | jboss_data_grid | 7.0.0 | |
| redhat | jboss_enterprise_application_platform | - | |
| redhat | jboss_enterprise_application_platform | 6.4.21 | |
| redhat | jboss_enterprise_application_platform | 7.0.0 | |
| redhat | jboss_enterprise_application_platform | 7.2.0 | |
| redhat | jboss_enterprise_application_platform | 7.3.0 | |
| redhat | openshift_application_runtimes | - | |
| redhat | single_sign-on | - |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2BF03A52-4068-47EA-8846-1E5FB708CE1A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CD354E32-A8B0-484C-B4C6-9FBCD3430D2D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8423D7F-3A8F-4AD8-BF51-245C9D8DD816",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6.4.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5B9B368A-C894-4D7A-8E64-4B12DDE572E5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0952BA1A-5DF9-400F-B01F-C3A398A8A2D4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B157A2D-3422-4224-82D9-15AB3B989075",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_application_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A33441B3-B301-426C-A976-08CE5FE72EFB",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "341E6313-20D5-44CB-9719-B20585DC5AD6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El problema parece ser que JBoss EAP versi\u00f3n 6.4.21, no analiza el nombre de campo de acuerdo con RFC7230[1] ya que devuelve 200 en lugar de 400"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2020-1710",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:11:13.130",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2020-09-16T15:15:12.457",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…