fkie_cve-2017-7551
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2017-08-16 18:29
Modified
2025-04-20 01:37
Severity ?
Summary
389-ds-base version before 1.3.5.19 and 1.3.6.7 are vulnerable to password brute-force attacks during account lockout due to different return codes returned on password attempts.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2569 | ||
secalert@redhat.com | https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49336 | Exploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2569 | ||
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49336 | Exploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
fedoraproject | 389_directory_server | 1.3.5.19 | |
fedoraproject | 389_directory_server | 1.3.6.7 |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:389_directory_server:1.3.5.19:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "C56A41C4-3612-431A-9D31-49EAAF080FCC", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:389_directory_server:1.3.6.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "F0A7D3E1-5DFE-4D54-82BF-D0DDC550089C", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "389-ds-base version before 1.3.5.19 and 1.3.6.7 are vulnerable to password brute-force attacks during account lockout due to different return codes returned on password attempts.", }, { lang: "es", value: "389-ds-base en su versión anterior a 1.3.5.19 y 1.3.6.7 es vulnerable a ataques de fuerza bruta de contraseñas durante un bloqueo de cuenta debido a los diferentes códigos de retorno que se devuelven durante los intentos de contraseña.", }, ], id: "CVE-2017-7551", lastModified: "2025-04-20T01:37:25.860", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: true, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 5, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "NONE", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], cvssMetricV30: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 9.8, baseSeverity: "CRITICAL", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2017-08-16T18:29:00.317", references: [ { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2569", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", tags: [ "Exploit", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49336", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2569", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Exploit", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49336", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com", vulnStatus: "Deferred", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-209", }, ], source: "secalert@redhat.com", type: "Primary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-640", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.