GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2016-9121

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2017-03-28 02:59 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:55
Summary
go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from an invalid curve attack for the ECDH-ES algorithm. When deriving a shared key using ECDH-ES for an encrypted message, go-jose neglected to check that the received public key on a message is on the same curve as the static private key of the receiver, thus making it vulnerable to an invalid curve attack.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
go-jose_project go-jose *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "support@hackerone.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:go-jose_project:go-jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "461700A0-1ABE-4A30-9C79-80C835D8B62E",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.0.3",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from an invalid curve attack for the ECDH-ES algorithm. When deriving a shared key using ECDH-ES for an encrypted message, go-jose neglected to check that the received public key on a message is on the same curve as the static private key of the receiver, thus making it vulnerable to an invalid curve attack."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "go-jose en versiones anteriores a 1.0.4 sufre de un ataque de curva no v\u00e1lida para el algoritmo ECDH-ES. Al derivar una clave compartida usando ECDH-ES para un mensaje encriptado, go-jose descuidado para comprobar que la clave p\u00fablica recibida en un mensaje est\u00e1 en la misma curva que la clave privada est\u00e1tica del receptor, haci\u00e9ndola vulnerable a una curva no v\u00e1lida ataque."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2016-9121",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:55:33.213",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.4,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 4.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2017-03-28T02:59:00.213",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/c7581939a3656bb65e89d64da0a52364a33d2507"
    },
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/164590"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/c7581939a3656bb65e89d64da0a52364a33d2507"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/164590"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-326"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…