fkie_cve-2015-8738
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-01-04 05:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The s7comm_decode_ud_cpu_szl_subfunc function in epan/dissectors/packet-s7comm_szl_ids.c in the S7COMM dissector in Wireshark 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the list count in an SZL response, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error and application crash) via a crafted packet.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wireshark:wireshark:2.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E2A443-32DB-4C8B-8D2D-AE4F80A154A1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The s7comm_decode_ud_cpu_szl_subfunc function in epan/dissectors/packet-s7comm_szl_ids.c in the S7COMM dissector in Wireshark 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the list count in an SZL response, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error and application crash) via a crafted packet."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La funci\u00f3n s7comm_decode_ud_cpu_szl_subfunc en epan/dissectors/packet-s7comm_szl_ids.c en el disector S7COMM en Wireshark 2.0.x en versiones anteriores a 2.0.1 no valida el recuento de lista en una respuesta SZL, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (error de divisi\u00f3n por cero y ca\u00edda de aplicaci\u00f3n) a trav\u00e9s de un paquete manipulado."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-8738",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2016-01-04T05:59:29.020",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034551"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2015-56.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11823"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=858c3f0079f987833fb22eba2c361d1a88ba4103"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-05"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034551"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2015-56.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11823"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=858c3f0079f987833fb22eba2c361d1a88ba4103"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-05"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…