FKIE_CVE-2007-5560

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2007-10-18 20:17 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:46
Severity
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in the Juniper HTTP Service allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP packet. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.irmplc.com/index.php/111-Vendor-Alerts
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/111-Vendor-Alerts
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
juniper http_service *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:juniper:http_service:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1F99D0FF-8B8E-497B-A194-96A7740AFAB2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the Juniper HTTP Service allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP packet.  NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en mont\u00edculo en el servicio Juniper HTTP Service permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n mediante un paquete HTTP manipulado. NOTA: a fecha de 16/10/2007, la \u00fanica revelaci\u00f3n es un vago preaviso sin informaci\u00f3n de uso inmediato. Sin embargo, dado que proviene de un investigador reputado, se le ha asignado un identificador CVE con prop\u00f3sito de seguimiento."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2007-5560",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:46:23.903",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "baseScore": 10.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 10.0,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": true,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2007-10-18T20:17:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/111-Vendor-Alerts"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/111-Vendor-Alerts"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-119"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.