fkie_cve-2004-0694
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2011-02-04 01:00
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in LHA 1.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors related to "command line processing," a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-0771. NOTE: this issue may be REJECTED if there are not any cases in which LHA is setuid or is otherwise used across security boundaries.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
tsugio_okamoto lha *



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:tsugio_okamoto:lha:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B01C733D-FFA9-46C9-B18F-46AA485F8667",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.14",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Buffer overflow in LHA 1.14 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors related to \"command line processing,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-0771.  NOTE: this issue may be REJECTED if there are not any cases in which LHA is setuid or is otherwise used across security boundaries."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en LHA v1.14 y versiones anteriores  permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda) o ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n mediante vectores relacionados con \"procesamiento de linea de comandos\", una vulnerabilidad diferente de CVE-2004-0771. NOTA: este problema puede ser rechazado si no hay casos en los que LHA es setuid o que sea utilizado a trav\u00e9s de l\u00edmites de seguridad."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2004-0694",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2011-02-04T01:00:02.883",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-440.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9981"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-440.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9981"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-119"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…