CVE-2026-9636 (GCVE-0-2026-9636)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-14 15:11 – Updated: 2026-07-14 15:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix® 5380 ControlLogix® 5580 / 1756-EN4 Communications Module – Certificate Revocation List Vulnerability
Summary
A security issue exists within CompactLogix® 5380, ControlLogix® 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-299 - Improper check for certificate revocation
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix® 5580, CompactLogix® 5380, GuardLogix® 5580, Compact GuardLogix® 5380, 1756-EN4TR |
Affected:
Version 36 - Version 37
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-9636",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-14T15:54:57.625184Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-14T15:55:05.004Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ControlLogix\u00ae 5580, CompactLogix\u00ae 5380, GuardLogix\u00ae 5580, Compact GuardLogix\u00ae 5380, 1756-EN4TR",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 36 - Version 37"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A security issue exists within CompactLogix\u00ae 5380, ControlLogix\u00ae 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections."
}
],
"value": "A security issue exists within CompactLogix\u00ae 5380, ControlLogix\u00ae 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-299",
"description": "CWE-299 Improper check for certificate revocation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-14T15:11:42.995Z",
"orgId": "b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0",
"shortName": "Rockwell"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1788.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Upgrade to firmware version 38.011 or later.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor\u0026nbsp;1756-EN4TR upgrade to version 8.001 or later."
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to firmware version 38.011 or later.\n\nFor\u00a01756-EN4TR upgrade to version 8.001 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "SD1788",
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Rockwell Automation CompactLogix\u00ae 5380 ControlLogix\u00ae 5580 / 1756-EN4 Communications Module \u2013 Certificate Revocation List Vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0",
"assignerShortName": "Rockwell",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-9636",
"datePublished": "2026-07-14T15:11:42.995Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-26T18:10:55.329Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-14T15:55:05.004Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-9636",
"date": "2026-07-15",
"epss": "0.0014",
"percentile": "0.03733"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9636\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-14T16:17:05.860\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-14T16:46:49.030\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A security issue exists within CompactLogix\u00ae 5380, ControlLogix\u00ae 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Rockwell Automation\",\"product\":\"ControlLogix\u00ae 5580, CompactLogix\u00ae 5380, GuardLogix\u00ae 5580, Compact GuardLogix\u00ae 5380, 1756-EN4TR\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"Version 36 - Version 37\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-14T15:54:57.625184Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-9636\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-299\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1788.html\",\"source\":\"PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-9636\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-14T15:54:57.625184Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-14T15:55:00.563Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Rockwell Automation CompactLogix\\u00ae 5380 ControlLogix\\u00ae 5580 / 1756-EN4 Communications Module \\u2013 Certificate Revocation List Vulnerability\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"SD1788\", \"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 8.2, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Rockwell Automation\", \"product\": \"ControlLogix\\u00ae 5580, CompactLogix\\u00ae 5380, GuardLogix\\u00ae 5580, Compact GuardLogix\\u00ae 5380, 1756-EN4TR\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"Version 36 - Version 37\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to firmware version 38.011 or later.\\n\\nFor\\u00a01756-EN4TR upgrade to version 8.001 or later.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to firmware version 38.011 or later.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor\u0026nbsp;1756-EN4TR upgrade to version 8.001 or later.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1788.html\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A security issue exists within CompactLogix\\u00ae 5380, ControlLogix\\u00ae 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"A security issue exists within CompactLogix\\u00ae 5380, ControlLogix\\u00ae 5580, and EN4 communication modules related to CIP Security certificate revocation handling. The security issue stems from the controller failing to properly reject certificates signed by an intermediate certificate that has been revoked via a Certificate Revocation List (CRL). This could allow a network-based attacker to establish a connection using a certificate that should be untrusted, potentially bypassing CIP Security protections.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-299\", \"description\": \"CWE-299 Improper check for certificate revocation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0\", \"shortName\": \"Rockwell\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-14T15:11:42.995Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-9636\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-14T15:55:05.004Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-26T18:10:55.329Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-14T15:11:42.995Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Rockwell\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…