CVE-2026-95106 (GCVE-0-2026-95106)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 19:23 – Updated: 2026-10-06 19:23
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries
Summary
Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git's own consistency checks reject. Gitea's web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while `git checkout`, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff and file views show benign content while CI and checkouts at the same commit use different, attacker-controlled content. Incoming objects are now checked for consistency; objects already stored in existing repositories are not rescanned.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/adviso… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39472 | patch |
| https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/ | release-notes |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0 | release-notes |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "https://github.com/izzysec"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/TheFox0x7"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/lunny"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/silverwind"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git\u0027s own consistency checks reject. Gitea\u0027s web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while `git checkout`, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff and file views show benign content while CI and checkouts at the same commit use different, attacker-controlled content. Incoming objects are now checked for consistency; objects already stored in existing repositories are not rescanned."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:23:57.452Z",
"orgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"shortName": "Gitea"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-6pv5-8rp7-8c75",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-6pv5-8rp7-8c75"
},
{
"name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39472",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39472"
},
{
"name": "Gitea 28.0.0 release announcement",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/"
},
{
"name": "go-gitea/gitea v28.0.0 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0"
}
],
"title": "Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"assignerShortName": "Gitea",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-95106",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T19:23:57.452Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-04T21:57:35.565Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:23:57.452Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-95106",
"date": "2026-10-07",
"epss": "0.00156",
"percentile": "0.04183"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git\u0027s own consistency checks reject. Gitea\u0027s web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while `git checkout`, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff and file views show benign content while CI and checkouts at the same commit use different, attacker-controlled content. Incoming objects are now checked for consistency; objects already stored in existing repositories are not rescanned."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-95106",
"lastModified": "2026-10-07T13:45:36.947",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-10-06T20:17:34.867",
"references": [
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39472"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-6pv5-8rp7-8c75"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…