CVE-2026-89008 (GCVE-0-2026-89008)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-18 06:00 – Updated: 2026-09-18 06:00
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Bookit < 2.6.0.5 - Bookit Staff+ Appointment PII Disclosure
Summary
The Bookit — Booking & Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5 does not perform an authorization check on one of its appointment-retrieval actions, allowing users with a low-privilege Bookit — Booking & Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5-specific role to read other users' appointment records, including customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and private booking comments.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be5cf196-2f4b-4a… | exploitvdb-entrytechnical-description |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Bookit — Booking & Appointment Calendar |
Affected:
0 , < 2.6.0.5
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Farid Narimanov"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "WPScan"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5 does not perform an authorization check on one of its appointment-retrieval actions, allowing users with a low-privilege Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5-specific role to read other users\u0027 appointment records, including customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and private booking comments."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-200 Information Exposure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-18T06:00:16.893Z",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be5cf196-2f4b-4ad6-b477-287f80f1dd0d/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Bookit \u003c 2.6.0.5 - Bookit Staff+ Appointment PII Disclosure",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-89008",
"datePublished": "2026-09-18T06:00:16.893Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-10T16:21:58.314Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-18T06:00:16.893Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "contact@wpscan.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5 does not perform an authorization check on one of its appointment-retrieval actions, allowing users with a low-privilege Bookit \u2014 Booking \u0026 Appointment Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.0.5-specific role to read other users\u0027 appointment records, including customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and private booking comments."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-89008",
"lastModified": "2026-09-18T06:16:41.597",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-18T06:16:41.597",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be5cf196-2f4b-4ad6-b477-287f80f1dd0d/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…