CVE-2026-78466 (GCVE-0-2026-78466)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-25 05:31 – Updated: 2026-08-26 16:39
VLAI

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-78278. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-78278. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-78278 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T16:39:13.200Z",
        "orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
        "shortName": "Wordfence"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-78278. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-78278. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-78278 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
    "assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-78466",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-25T05:31:28.620Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-08-26T16:39:13.200Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-24T16:32:17.654Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T16:39:13.200Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-78466",
      "date": "2026-08-26",
      "epss": "0.00161",
      "percentile": "0.05532"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-78466\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"published\":\"2026-08-25T06:19:00.227\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-26T16:19:05.917\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The Fluent Boards Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.11 due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to perform an unauthorized action.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Fluent Boars\",\"product\":\"Fluent Boards Pro\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"2.0.11\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-639\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://fluentboards.com/\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/bec19d80-ba51-4ff8-a111-c2e45928fb51?source=cve\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.