GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-68904 (GCVE-0-2026-68904)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 16:18 – Updated: 2026-09-16 18:34
VLAI
Title
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
Summary
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-16 18:18 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
node-opcua node-opcua Affected: >= 2.0.0, < 2.170.0
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-68904",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-16T18:18:49.358461Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T18:34:50.941Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "node-opcua",
          "vendor": "node-opcua",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.170.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server\u0027s clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T16:18:28.984Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/releases/tag/v2.170.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/releases/tag/v2.170.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-68904",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-16T16:18:28.984Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-31T21:04:04.039Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T18:34:50.941Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-68904",
      "date": "2026-09-17",
      "epss": "0.00424",
      "percentile": "0.36176"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-68904\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-09-16T17:18:00.917\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-16T19:17:25.403\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server\u0027s clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"node-opcua\",\"product\":\"node-opcua\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.170.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":4.7}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-16T18:18:49.358461Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-68904\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/releases/tag/v2.170.0\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-400\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"baseScore\": 7, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/releases/tag/v2.170.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/releases/tag/v2.170.0\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"node-opcua\", \"product\": \"node-opcua\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.170.0\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-16T16:18:28.984Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server\u0027s clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-68904\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-16T18:18:49.358461Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-16T18:18:50.743Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-68904\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-31T21:04:04.039Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-16T16:18:28.984Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-16T18:34:50.941Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…