CVE-2026-35021 (GCVE-0-2026-35021)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-06 18:59 – Updated: 2026-05-29 16:26
VLAI

This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code."
            }
          ],
          "value": "This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-35021",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-06T18:59:06.979Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-31T20:40:15.618Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-35021",
      "date": "2026-05-29",
      "epss": "0.00041",
      "percentile": "0.12883"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-35021\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"disclosure@vulncheck.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-06T20:16:25.067\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-29T18:16:44.543\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"shortName\": \"VulnCheck\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"base64\": false, \"value\": \"This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the affected code path cannot be triggered through normal usage of Claude Code.\"}]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-35021\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulnCheck\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-31T20:40:15.618Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-06T18:59:06.979Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2026-05-29T16:26:11.666Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.