CVE-2026-24332 (GCVE-0-2026-24332)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-22 08:10 – Updated: 2026-01-22 15:11 Exclusively Hosted Service
VLAI?
Summary
Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user's client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with "status": "offline"), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as "You will appear offline."
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-204 - Observable Response Discrepancy
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Discord WebSocket API service Affected: 0 , ≤ 2026-01-16 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-24332",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-22T15:10:52.267809Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-22T15:11:05.705Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "WebSocket API service",
          "vendor": "Discord",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2026-01-16",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user\u0027s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with \"status\": \"offline\"), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as \"You will appear offline.\""
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-204",
              "description": "CWE-204 Observable Response Discrepancy",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-22T08:26:11.593Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xmrcat.org/discord-invisibility-bypass"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "exclusively-hosted-service"
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-24332",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-22T08:10:44.462Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-22T08:10:44.192Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-22T15:11:05.705Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-24332\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2026-01-22T08:16:00.857\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-01-22T08:16:00.857\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"exclusively-hosted-service\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user\u0027s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with \\\"status\\\": \\\"offline\\\"), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as \\\"You will appear offline.\\\"\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-204\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://xmrcat.org/discord-invisibility-bypass\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-24332\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-22T15:10:52.267809Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-22T15:11:00.708Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"tags\": [\"exclusively-hosted-service\"], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Discord\", \"product\": \"WebSocket API service\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2026-01-16\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://xmrcat.org/discord-invisibility-bypass\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"CVE-Request-form 0.0.1\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user\u0027s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with \\\"status\\\": \\\"offline\\\"), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as \\\"You will appear offline.\\\"\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-204\", \"description\": \"CWE-204 Observable Response Discrepancy\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-22T08:26:11.593Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-24332\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-22T15:11:05.705Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-01-22T08:10:44.192Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-22T08:10:44.462Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.