CVE-2026-16328 (GCVE-0-2026-16328)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-29 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-29 19:11
VLAI
Title
consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure
Summary
In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server's configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server's Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
HashiCorp Tooling Affected: 0.1.0 , < 0.1.4 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
This issue was identified by HE WEI (ギカク).
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-16328",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "64 bit",
            "32 bit",
            "x86",
            "ARM",
            "MacOS",
            "Windows",
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "Tooling",
          "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
          "vendor": "HashiCorp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.1.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue was identified by HE WEI (\u30ae\u30ab\u30af)."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 8.6,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
        "orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
        "shortName": "HashiCorp"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
    "assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-16328",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-16328",
      "date": "2026-07-30",
      "epss": "0.00232",
      "percentile": "0.14228"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-16328\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-29T19:16:45.060\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-30T14:08:23.057\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"HashiCorp\",\"product\":\"Tooling\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"platforms\":[\"64 bit\",\"32 bit\",\"x86\",\"ARM\",\"MacOS\",\"Windows\",\"Linux\"],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0.1.0\",\"lessThan\":\"0.1.4\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.0}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-16328\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612\",\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-16328\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T19:11:00.399Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"HCSEC-2026-24\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This issue was identified by HE WEI (\\u30ae\\u30ab\\u30af).\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-664\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.6, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server\", \"vendor\": \"HashiCorp\", \"product\": \"Tooling\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.1.0\", \"lessThan\": \"0.1.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"platforms\": [\"64 bit\", \"32 bit\", \"x86\", \"ARM\", \"MacOS\", \"Windows\", \"Linux\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc\", \"shortName\": \"HashiCorp\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-16328\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"HashiCorp\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…