CVE-2026-16326 (GCVE-0-2026-16326)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-29 18:40 – Updated: 2026-07-29 19:10
VLAI
Title
consul-mcp-server vulnerable to cross-tenant credential reuse in streamable-HTTP stateless mode
Summary
In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not properly isolate session state in stateless mode, which may allow one client's Consul authentication token to be used for subsequent requests from other clients. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-16326) is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-488 - Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
HashiCorp Tooling Affected: 0.1.0 , < 0.1.4 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
This issue was reported by an internal HashiCorp team.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-16326",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:01.220224Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:10:11.027Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "64 bit",
            "32 bit",
            "x86",
            "ARM",
            "MacOS",
            "Windows",
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "Tooling",
          "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
          "vendor": "HashiCorp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.1.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue was reported by an internal HashiCorp team."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not properly isolate session state in stateless mode, which may allow one client\u0027s Consul authentication token to be used for subsequent requests from other clients. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-16326) is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not properly isolate session state in stateless mode, which may allow one client\u0027s Consul authentication token to be used for subsequent requests from other clients. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-16326) is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-60",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (Session Replay)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 10,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-488",
              "description": "CWE-488: Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:40:08.796Z",
        "orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
        "shortName": "HashiCorp"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to cross-tenant credential reuse in streamable-HTTP stateless mode"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
    "assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-16326",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:40:08.796Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:16.465Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:10:11.027Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-16326\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-29T19:16:44.900\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-29T19:16:44.900\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not properly isolate session state in stateless mode, which may allow one client\u0027s Consul authentication token to be used for subsequent requests from other clients. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-16326) is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"HashiCorp\",\"product\":\"Tooling\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"platforms\":[\"64 bit\",\"32 bit\",\"x86\",\"ARM\",\"MacOS\",\"Windows\",\"Linux\"],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0.1.0\",\"lessThan\":\"0.1.4\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":6.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-488\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612\",\"source\":\"security@hashicorp.com\"}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…