Vulnerability-Lookup

CVE-2026-15144 (GCVE-0-2026-15144)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-29 16:10 – Updated: 2026-07-29 17:56

Title

@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 address rotation

Summary

@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.

Severity

7.3 (High)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2026-07-29 17:56 UTC

CWE

CWE-307 - Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Assigner

openjs redhat root

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/sec…
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version	CPE status
@fastify/rate-limit	@fastify/rate-limit	Affected: 0 , < 11.2.0 (semver) Unaffected: 11.2.0 (semver)	guessed

Credits

0xShemesh mcollina climba03003 UlisesGascon

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-15144",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T17:56:31.392Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/@fastify/rate-limit",
          "product": "@fastify/rate-limit",
          "vendor": "@fastify/rate-limit",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "11.2.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "11.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "0xShemesh"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "mcollina"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "climba03003"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "UlisesGascon"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option."
            }
          ],
          "value": "@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.3,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-770",
              "description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z",
        "orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "shortName": "openjs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 address rotation",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
    "assignerShortName": "openjs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-15144",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-08T17:27:38.479Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T17:56:31.392Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-15144",
      "date": "2026-09-17",
      "epss": "0.00246",
      "percentile": "0.16146"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-15144\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"published\":\"2026-07-29T17:16:50.637\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-08-05T15:33:13.620\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"@fastify/rate-limit\",\"product\":\"@fastify/rate-limit\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:npm/@fastify/rate-limit\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"11.2.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"11.2.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":7.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-15144\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-307\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-770\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:fastify:fastify\\\\/rate-limit:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"11.2.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F70E0ADF-5F25-4FF1-9C07-6EB07893BECD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html\",\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v\",\"source\":\"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-15144\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T17:56:27.711Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 address rotation\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"0xShemesh\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"mcollina\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"climba03003\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"UlisesGascon\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"@fastify/rate-limit\", \"product\": \"@fastify/rate-limit\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"11.2.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"11.2.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:npm/@fastify/rate-limit\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v\"}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cve-kit 1.0.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-307\", \"description\": \"CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-770\", \"description\": \"CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"shortName\": \"openjs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-15144\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-29T17:56:31.392Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-08T17:27:38.479Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openjs\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}

FKIE_CVE-2026-15144

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-29 17:16 - Updated: 2026-08-05 15:33

Severity

7.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Summary

References

	URL	Tags
	ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb	https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html	Vendor Advisory
	ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb	https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v	Vendor Advisory

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	fastify	fastify\/rate-limit	*

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/@fastify/rate-limit",
          "product": "@fastify/rate-limit",
          "vendor": "@fastify/rate-limit",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "11.2.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "11.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:fastify:fastify\\/rate-limit:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F70E0ADF-5F25-4FF1-9C07-6EB07893BECD",
              "versionEndExcluding": "11.2.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-15144",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-05T15:33:13.620",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.3,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-15144",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-29T17:16:50.637",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-307"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-770"
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.