CVE-2025-9999 (GCVE-0-2025-9999)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-09-05 16:41
Modified
2025-09-05 17:49
CWE
  • CWE-940 - Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel
  • CWE-1288 - Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
Summary
Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
arcinfo PcVue Version: 16.0
Version: 15.0
Version: 12.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-9999",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-09-05T17:48:53.486647Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T17:49:13.857Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "modules": [
            "Networking"
          ],
          "product": "PcVue",
          "vendor": "arcinfo",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "16.3.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "16.0",
              "versionType": "cpe"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "15.2.12",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "15.0",
              "versionType": "cpe"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "12.0.31",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "12.0",
              "versionType": "cpe"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Guillaume Andr\u00e9 (Synacktiv)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Pierre Gertner (Synacktiv)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-09-04T22:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application."
        }
      ],
      "exploits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "No POC available."
            }
          ],
          "value": "No POC available."
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Not known to be exploited"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Not known to be exploited"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "YES",
            "Recovery": "USER",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT",
            "baseScore": 7.6,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "GREEN",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/AU:Y/R:U/RE:M/U:Green",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "Automatable": "Yes",
              "Exploitation": "None",
              "Technical Impact": "Partial",
              "version": "2.0.3"
            },
            "type": "SSVCv2.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-940",
              "description": "CWE-940 Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1288",
              "description": "CWE-1288 Improper Validation of Consistency within Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T16:41:01.957Z",
        "orgId": "87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932",
        "shortName": "arcinfo"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.pcvue.com/security/#SB2025-4"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cb\u003eHarden the configuration\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cu\u003eWho should apply this recommendation:\u003c/u\u003e All users\u003cbr\u003eThe system operators are highly recommended to take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. Specifically, users should:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eMinimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the Internet unless required.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLocate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eWhen remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eUpdate PcVue\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cu\u003eWho should apply this recommendation:\u003c/u\u003e All users using the affected component\u003cbr\u003eApply the patch by installing a fixed PcVue version.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eA fixed release must be installed on all stations. Any attempt to establish a connection between a station running a release with the fix and a station without it will fail.\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003cb\u003e\u003cu\u003eAvailable patches:\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFixed in:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e16.3.1\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e15.2.12\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e12.0.31\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Harden the configuration\nWho should apply this recommendation: All users\nThe system operators are highly recommended to take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. Specifically, users should:\n  *  Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the Internet unless required.\n  *  Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.\n  *  When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.\n\n\n\nUpdate PcVue\nWho should apply this recommendation: All users using the affected component\nApply the patch by installing a fixed PcVue version.\nA fixed release must be installed on all stations. Any attempt to establish a connection between a station running a release with the fix and a station without it will fail.\n\n\n\n\nAvailable patches:\nFixed in:\n  *  16.3.1\n  *  15.2.12\n  *  12.0.31"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "SB2025-4",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Improper validation of payload elements",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932",
    "assignerShortName": "arcinfo",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-9999",
    "datePublished": "2025-09-05T16:41:01.957Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-04T16:34:24.743Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T17:49:13.857Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-9999\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\",\"published\":\"2025-09-05T17:15:40.263\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-05T17:47:10.303\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:X/RE:M/U:Green\",\"baseScore\":7.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"YES\",\"Recovery\":\"USER\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"MODERATE\",\"providerUrgency\":\"GREEN\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-940\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1288\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.pcvue.com/security/#SB2025-4\",\"source\":\"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-9999\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-09-05T17:48:53.486647Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-09-05T17:49:06.491Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Improper validation of payload elements\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"SB2025-4\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Guillaume Andr\\u00e9 (Synacktiv)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Pierre Gertner (Synacktiv)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"USER\", \"baseScore\": 7.6, \"Automatable\": \"YES\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/AU:Y/R:U/RE:M/U:Green\", \"providerUrgency\": \"GREEN\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"MODERATE\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"SSVCv2.0\", \"content\": {\"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"Automatable\": \"Yes\", \"Exploitation\": \"None\", \"Technical Impact\": \"Partial\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"arcinfo\", \"modules\": [\"Networking\"], \"product\": \"PcVue\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"16.0\", \"lessThan\": \"16.3.1\", \"versionType\": \"cpe\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"15.0\", \"lessThan\": \"15.2.12\", \"versionType\": \"cpe\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"12.0\", \"lessThan\": \"12.0.31\", \"versionType\": \"cpe\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"exploits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"No POC available.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"No POC available.\", \"base64\": false}]}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Not known to be exploited\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Not known to be exploited\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Harden the configuration\\nWho should apply this recommendation: All users\\nThe system operators are highly recommended to take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. Specifically, users should:\\n  *  Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the Internet unless required.\\n  *  Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.\\n  *  When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.\\n\\n\\n\\nUpdate PcVue\\nWho should apply this recommendation: All users using the affected component\\nApply the patch by installing a fixed PcVue version.\\nA fixed release must be installed on all stations. Any attempt to establish a connection between a station running a release with the fix and a station without it will fail.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nAvailable patches:\\nFixed in:\\n  *  16.3.1\\n  *  15.2.12\\n  *  12.0.31\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cb\u003eHarden the configuration\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cu\u003eWho should apply this recommendation:\u003c/u\u003e All users\u003cbr\u003eThe system operators are highly recommended to take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. Specifically, users should:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eMinimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the Internet unless required.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eLocate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eWhen remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eUpdate PcVue\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cu\u003eWho should apply this recommendation:\u003c/u\u003e All users using the affected component\u003cbr\u003eApply the patch by installing a fixed PcVue version.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eA fixed release must be installed on all stations. Any attempt to establish a connection between a station running a release with the fix and a station without it will fail.\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\\n\\n\u003cb\u003e\u003cu\u003eAvailable patches:\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFixed in:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e16.3.1\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e15.2.12\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e12.0.31\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-09-04T22:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.pcvue.com/security/#SB2025-4\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Some payload elements of the messages sent between two stations in a networking architecture are not properly checked on the receiving station allowing an attacker to execute unauthorized commands in the application.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-940\", \"description\": \"CWE-940 Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-1288\", \"description\": \"CWE-1288 Improper Validation of Consistency within Input\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\", \"shortName\": \"arcinfo\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-09-05T16:41:01.957Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-9999\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-09-05T17:49:13.857Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-09-04T16:34:24.743Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"87c8e6ad-f0f5-4ca8-89e2-89f26d6ed932\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-09-05T16:41:01.957Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"arcinfo\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…