CVE-2025-55734 (GCVE-0-2025-55734)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-08-19 18:38
Modified
2025-08-19 19:22
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
Summary
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is "admin" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
| security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx | Exploit, Third Party Advisory | |
| security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8 | Exploit, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DogukanUrker | FlaskBlog |
Version: <= 2.8.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-55734",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-19T19:22:31.895701Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:22:37.704Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FlaskBlog",
"vendor": "DogukanUrker",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 2.8.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is \"admin\" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T18:38:04.355Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "flaskBlo Authorization Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-55734",
"datePublished": "2025-08-19T18:38:04.355Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-14T22:31:17.683Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-19T19:22:37.704Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-55734\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-08-19T19:15:37.450\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-08-22T20:58:55.130\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is \\\"admin\\\" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"flaskBlog es una aplicaci\u00f3n de blog desarrollada con Flask. En la versi\u00f3n 2.8.0 y anteriores, el c\u00f3digo comprueba si el rol de usuario es \\\"admin\\\" solo al visitar la p\u00e1gina /admin, pero no al visitar sus subrutas. En concreto, solo el archivo route/adminPanel.py comprueba el rol del usuario cuando este intenta acceder a la p\u00e1gina de administraci\u00f3n, pero este control no se realiza para las p\u00e1ginas route/adminPanelComments.py y route/adminPanelPosts.py. Por lo tanto, un usuario no autorizado puede eludir las restricciones, filtrar datos confidenciales y acceder a las siguientes p\u00e1ginas: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments y /adminpanel/comments.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-862\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dogukanurker:flaskblog:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2.8.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5EEEDB77-8F07-4D42-A2BE-34013446D9F8\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-55734\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-19T19:22:31.895701Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-19T19:20:51.008Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"flaskBlo Authorization Bypass\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"DogukanUrker\", \"product\": \"FlaskBlog\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c= 2.8.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-jw79-2xvp-76p8\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/DogukanUrker/FlaskBlog/security/advisories/GHSA-h239-vv39-v3vx\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is \\\"admin\\\" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-862\", \"description\": \"CWE-862: Missing Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-19T18:38:04.355Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-55734\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-19T19:22:37.704Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-08-14T22:31:17.683Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-19T18:38:04.355Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…