CVE-2025-2724 (GCVE-0-2025-2724)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that "the only way to get an object of type GsfMSOleSortingKey is via gsf_msole_sorting_key_new which adds that extra zero element".
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \"the only way to get an object of type GsfMSOleSortingKey is via gsf_msole_sorting_key_new which adds that extra zero element\"."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-2724",
"datePublished": "2025-03-25T01:31:04.182Z",
"dateRejected": "2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-24T12:46:34.800Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-2724\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2025-03-25T02:15:14.143\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-22T13:15:43.203\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \\\"the only way to get an object of type GsfMSOleSortingKey is via gsf_msole_sorting_key_new which adds that extra zero element\\\".\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"shortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The code maintainer explains that \\\"the only way to get an object of type GsfMSOleSortingKey is via gsf_msole_sorting_key_new which adds that extra zero element\\\".\"}]}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-2724\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-03-24T12:46:34.800Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-03-25T01:31:04.182Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2025-04-22T12:25:39.888Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…