CVE-2025-12199 (GCVE-0-2025-12199)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: Based on the analysis by MITRE and review of community feedback, the reported conditions represent expected and intentional behavior within dnsmasq's documented design, rather than security vulnerabilities.

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z",
        "orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
        "shortName": "VulDB"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: Based on the analysis by MITRE and review of community feedback, the reported conditions represent expected and intentional behavior within dnsmasq\u0027s documented design, rather than security vulnerabilities."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
    "assignerShortName": "VulDB",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-12199",
    "datePublished": "2025-10-27T01:02:09.029Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-10-25T06:22:00.749Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-12199\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2025-10-27T01:15:39.737\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-03T23:17:36.210\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: Based on the analysis by MITRE and review of community feedback, the reported conditions represent expected and intentional behavior within dnsmasq\u0027s documented design, rather than security vulnerabilities.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"shortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: Based on the analysis by MITRE and review of community feedback, the reported conditions represent expected and intentional behavior within dnsmasq\u0027s documented design, rather than security vulnerabilities.\"}]}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-12199\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-10-25T06:22:00.749Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-10-27T01:02:09.029Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2025-11-03T22:47:45.128Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.