Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2022-48827 (GCVE-0-2022-48827)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-07-16 11:44 – Updated: 2026-08-05 08:52| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 , < 1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9
(git)
Affected: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 , < c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0 (git) Affected: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 , < 44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b (git) Affected: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 , < 0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.12
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.12 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.220 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.24 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.16.10 , ≤ 5.16.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.17 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | RUGGEDCOM RST2428P |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T15:25:01.549Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:57:40.257913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:34:11.464Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:12:32.268Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.12"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.220",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.24",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.220",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.24",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:N - The bug is in the in-kernel NFS server (nfsd3_proc_read / nfsd4_read) and is reached by processing NFSv3/v4 READ RPCs over the network (TCP/UDP 2049); a remote NFS client triggers it by reading near OFFSET_MAX.\nAC:L - An attacker who can write to an export on a filesystem that allows MAX_LFS_FILESIZE (e.g. XFS) can create a sparse file of size OFFSET_MAX and then read it; the loff_t overflow and NFSERR_INVAL response occur reliably with no race or other condition outside attacker control.\nPR:N - Typical nfsd deployments use AUTH_SYS/AUTH_NULL with IP-based exports, so a remote peer that can reach the export self-asserts credentials with no cryptographic authentication and can open/read (and create) files that exercise the READ path.\nUI:N - The attacker drives file creation and the triggering READ entirely via NFS RPCs; no separate action by a victim user or administrator on the server is required.\nS:U - Impact is confined to the NFS server and its Linux clients\u2019 use of that service within the same host/kernel authority; there is no VM escape, IOMMU bypass, or other cross-boundary scope change.\nC:N - The defect only causes an out-of-range READ to fail with NFSERR_INVAL after VFS rejects the overflowing loff_t; there is no out-of-bounds read, UAF, or other information-disclosure primitive.\nI:N - There is no memory corruption, OOB write, or attacker-controlled modification of kernel or file data\u2014only a protocol error return for an overflowing offset/length pair.\nA:H - Linux NFS clients treat NFSERR_INVAL as non-fatal, drop the page without PageError, and indefinitely reissue the READ, hanging the reader and continuously hammering nfsd; infinite retry/hang is high availability impact."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:52:32.083Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
}
],
"title": "NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-48827",
"datePublished": "2024-07-16T11:44:12.019Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-16T11:38:08.903Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:52:32.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2022-48827",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00623",
"percentile": "0.48482"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: NFSD: corrige el comportamiento de READ cerca de OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni informa: \u0026gt; Debido a El commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: siempre proporcione buffers alineados a \u0026gt; las capas de lectura RPC\") en el cliente, una lectura de 0xfff est\u00e1 alineada con el tama\u00f1o del servidor de 0x1000. \u0026gt; \u0026gt; Como resultado, en una prueba donde el servidor tiene un archivo de tama\u00f1o \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffffff, y el cliente intenta leer desde el desplazamiento \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffff000, la lectura causa que loff_t se desborde en el servidor \u0026gt; y devuelve un c\u00f3digo NFS de EINVAL a el cliente. Como resultado, el cliente reintenta indefinidamente la solicitud. El cliente NFS de Linux no maneja NFS?ERR_INVAL, aunque todas las especificaciones de NFS permiten a los servidores devolver ese c\u00f3digo de estado para una READ. En lugar de NFS?ERR_INVAL, haga que las solicitudes READ fuera de rango se realicen correctamente y devuelvan un resultado breve. Establezca el indicador EOF en el resultado para evitar que el cliente vuelva a intentar la solicitud READ. Este comportamiento parece ser coherente con los servidores Solaris NFS. Tenga en cuenta que NFSv3 y NFSv4 utilizan valores de compensaci\u00f3n u64 en el cable. Estos deben convertirse a loff_t internamente antes de su uso; una conversi\u00f3n de tipo impl\u00edcita no es adecuada para este prop\u00f3sito. De lo contrario, las comprobaciones de VFS con sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes no funcionan correctamente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:34:09.767",
"published": "2024-07-16T12:15:06.420",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.12"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.220",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.24",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F1473515-78F6-495D-8E82-C2CBAEE048BF",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.220",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "866451F0-299E-416C-B0B8-AE6B33E62CCA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.24",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "679523BA-1392-404B-AB85-F5A5408B1ECC",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7BD5F8D9-54FA-4CB0-B4F0-CB0471FDDB2D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E6E34B23-78B4-4516-9BD8-61B33F4AC49A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C030FA3D-03F4-4FB9-9DBF-D08E5CAC51AA",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: NFSD: corrige el comportamiento de READ cerca de OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni informa: \u0026gt; Debido a El commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: siempre proporcione buffers alineados a \u0026gt; las capas de lectura RPC\") en el cliente, una lectura de 0xfff est\u00e1 alineada con el tama\u00f1o del servidor de 0x1000. \u0026gt; \u0026gt; Como resultado, en una prueba donde el servidor tiene un archivo de tama\u00f1o \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffffff, y el cliente intenta leer desde el desplazamiento \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffff000, la lectura causa que loff_t se desborde en el servidor \u0026gt; y devuelve un c\u00f3digo NFS de EINVAL a el cliente. Como resultado, el cliente reintenta indefinidamente la solicitud. El cliente NFS de Linux no maneja NFS?ERR_INVAL, aunque todas las especificaciones de NFS permiten a los servidores devolver ese c\u00f3digo de estado para una READ. En lugar de NFS?ERR_INVAL, haga que las solicitudes READ fuera de rango se realicen correctamente y devuelvan un resultado breve. Establezca el indicador EOF en el resultado para evitar que el cliente vuelva a intentar la solicitud READ. Este comportamiento parece ser coherente con los servidores Solaris NFS. Tenga en cuenta que NFSv3 y NFSv4 utilizan valores de compensaci\u00f3n u64 en el cable. Estos deben convertirse a loff_t internamente antes de su uso; una conversi\u00f3n de tipo impl\u00edcita no es adecuada para este prop\u00f3sito. De lo contrario, las comprobaciones de VFS con sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes no funcionan correctamente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:17:23.063",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:57:40.257913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-07-16T12:15:06.420",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T19:47:45+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2022-48827",
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"initial_release_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "273",
"product_status:known_affected": "90",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "120",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2022/cve-2022-48827.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-15T02:28:35Z",
"cve": "CVE-2022-48827",
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"initial_release_date": "2024-07-18T03:06:01Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "433",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "91",
"product_status:recommended": "595",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2022-48827.json",
"version": "62"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T15:25:01.549Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T10:12:32.268Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:57:40.257913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:21.262Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.12"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.220",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.24",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.220",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.24",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.12",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:N - The bug is in the in-kernel NFS server (nfsd3_proc_read / nfsd4_read) and is reached by processing NFSv3/v4 READ RPCs over the network (TCP/UDP 2049); a remote NFS client triggers it by reading near OFFSET_MAX.\nAC:L - An attacker who can write to an export on a filesystem that allows MAX_LFS_FILESIZE (e.g. XFS) can create a sparse file of size OFFSET_MAX and then read it; the loff_t overflow and NFSERR_INVAL response occur reliably with no race or other condition outside attacker control.\nPR:N - Typical nfsd deployments use AUTH_SYS/AUTH_NULL with IP-based exports, so a remote peer that can reach the export self-asserts credentials with no cryptographic authentication and can open/read (and create) files that exercise the READ path.\nUI:N - The attacker drives file creation and the triggering READ entirely via NFS RPCs; no separate action by a victim user or administrator on the server is required.\nS:U - Impact is confined to the NFS server and its Linux clients\u2019 use of that service within the same host/kernel authority; there is no VM escape, IOMMU bypass, or other cross-boundary scope change.\nC:N - The defect only causes an out-of-range READ to fail with NFSERR_INVAL after VFS rejects the overflowing loff_t; there is no out-of-bounds read, UAF, or other information-disclosure primitive.\nI:N - There is no memory corruption, OOB write, or attacker-controlled modification of kernel or file data\u2014only a protocol error return for an overflowing offset/length pair.\nA:H - Linux NFS clients treat NFSERR_INVAL as non-fatal, drop the page without PageError, and indefinitely reissue the READ, hanging the reader and continuously hammering nfsd; infinite retry/hang is high availability impact."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:52:32.083Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
}
],
"title": "NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-48827",
"datePublished": "2024-07-16T11:44:12.019Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-16T11:38:08.903Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:52:32.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44947"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3189-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243189-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3195-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243195-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3190-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243190-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3225-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243225-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3227-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243227-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3209-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243209-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3194-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243194-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0800
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0800",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3320-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243320-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3347-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243347-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3322-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243322-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3249-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243249-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3334-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243334-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3318-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243318-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3321-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243321-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3319-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243319-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3251-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243251-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3348-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243348-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3337-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243337-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3338-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243338-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3252-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243252-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3350-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243350-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3304-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243304-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3336-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243336-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3349-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243349-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2022-48827
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-07-16 12:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 10:177.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0 | Patch | |
| 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e | https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html | ||
| 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e | https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.17 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.17 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.17 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c",
"fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.12"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.220",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.24",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F1473515-78F6-495D-8E82-C2CBAEE048BF",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.220",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "866451F0-299E-416C-B0B8-AE6B33E62CCA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.24",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "679523BA-1392-404B-AB85-F5A5408B1ECC",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7BD5F8D9-54FA-4CB0-B4F0-CB0471FDDB2D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E6E34B23-78B4-4516-9BD8-61B33F4AC49A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.17:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C030FA3D-03F4-4FB9-9DBF-D08E5CAC51AA",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: NFSD: corrige el comportamiento de READ cerca de OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni informa: \u0026gt; Debido a El commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: siempre proporcione buffers alineados a \u0026gt; las capas de lectura RPC\") en el cliente, una lectura de 0xfff est\u00e1 alineada con el tama\u00f1o del servidor de 0x1000. \u0026gt; \u0026gt; Como resultado, en una prueba donde el servidor tiene un archivo de tama\u00f1o \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffffff, y el cliente intenta leer desde el desplazamiento \u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffffff000, la lectura causa que loff_t se desborde en el servidor \u0026gt; y devuelve un c\u00f3digo NFS de EINVAL a el cliente. Como resultado, el cliente reintenta indefinidamente la solicitud. El cliente NFS de Linux no maneja NFS?ERR_INVAL, aunque todas las especificaciones de NFS permiten a los servidores devolver ese c\u00f3digo de estado para una READ. En lugar de NFS?ERR_INVAL, haga que las solicitudes READ fuera de rango se realicen correctamente y devuelvan un resultado breve. Establezca el indicador EOF en el resultado para evitar que el cliente vuelva a intentar la solicitud READ. Este comportamiento parece ser coherente con los servidores Solaris NFS. Tenga en cuenta que NFSv3 y NFSv4 utilizan valores de compensaci\u00f3n u64 en el cable. Estos deben convertirse a loff_t internamente antes de su uso; una conversi\u00f3n de tipo impl\u00edcita no es adecuada para este prop\u00f3sito. De lo contrario, las comprobaciones de VFS con sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes no funcionan correctamente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:17:23.063",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-48827",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:57:40.257913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-07-16T12:15:06.420",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-G43C-R7C6-FHRV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX
Dan Aloni reports:
Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up to server rsize of 0x1000.
As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as a result indefinitely retries the request.
The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ.
Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.
Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-48827"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-16T12:15:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\n\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u003e Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\"NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u003e the RPC read layers\") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u003e to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u003e\n\u003e As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u003e 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u003e 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u003e and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u003e a result indefinitely retries the request.\n\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\n\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\n\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u003es_maxbytes do not work properly.",
"id": "GHSA-g43c-r7c6-fhrv",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:32:03Z",
"published": "2024-07-16T12:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-24-102-01
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2024-04-09 00:00 - Updated: 2026-05-14 06:00ICSA-25-226-07
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1961 (CVE-2022-48827)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-08-09 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX
Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request.
The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ.
Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.
Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new
This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().
Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 & while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done(CVE-2023-52887)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kunit: Fix kthread reference
There is a race condition when a kthread finishes after the deadline and before the call to kthread_stop(), which may lead to use after free.(CVE-2024-38561)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv
Reinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex lock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger the following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct stmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing this initialization.
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29 Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 sp : ffffffc0864e3570 x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003 x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000 x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8 x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698 x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34 tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0 taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
stm class: Fix a double free in stm_register_device()
The put_device(&stm->dev) call will trigger stm_device_release() which frees "stm" so the vfree(stm) on the next line is a double free.(CVE-2024-38627)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/shmem-helper: Fix BUG_ON() on mmap(PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE)
Lack of check for copy-on-write (COW) mapping in drm_gem_shmem_mmap allows users to call mmap with PROT_WRITE and MAP_PRIVATE flag causing a kernel panic due to BUG_ON in vmf_insert_pfn_prot: BUG_ON((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) && is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags));
Return -EINVAL early if COW mapping is detected.
This bug affects all drm drivers using default shmem helpers. It can be reproduced by this simple example: void *ptr = mmap(0, size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, mmap_offset); ptr[0] = 0;(CVE-2024-39497)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections
When releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to decrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the execution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls netdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately to kernel crashes.
A typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the following errors:
refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
And will then have a trace like:
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? show_regs+0x64/0x70
? __warn+0x83/0x120
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? report_bug+0x158/0x190
? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30
? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360
__sock_release+0x35/0xa0
sock_close+0x19/0x20
[...]
On reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets stuck in an infinite loop:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0
This patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold() and ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the logic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both cases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in ax25_release().(CVE-2024-40910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()
ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.
syzbot reported:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Workqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64 Code: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98 RBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000 R10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541 xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835 xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline] xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201 xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline] xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256 send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139 wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178 wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200 wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51 process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent possible NULL deref in fib6_nh_init()
syzbot reminds us that in6_dev_get() can return NULL.
fib6_nh_init() ip6_validate_gw( &idev ) ip6_route_check_nh( idev ) *idev = in6_dev_get(dev); // can be NULL
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 11237 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00249-gbe27b8965297 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024 RIP: 0010:fib6_nh_init+0x640/0x2160 net/ipv6/route.c:3606 Code: 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 64 24 58 48 8b 44 24 28 4c 8b 74 24 30 48 89 c1 48 89 44 24 28 48 8d 98 e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 0f 85 b3 17 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff 89 de e8 b8 8b RSP: 0018:ffffc900032775a0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffc90003277a54 RDI: ffff88802b3a08d8 RBP: ffffc900032778b0 R08: 00000000000002fc R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000002fc R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88802b3a08b8 R13: 1ffff9200064eec8 R14: ffffc90003277a00 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f940feb06c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000245e8000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ip6_route_info_create+0x99e/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3809 ip6_route_add+0x28/0x160 net/ipv6/route.c:3853 ipv6_route_ioctl+0x588/0x870 net/ipv6/route.c:4483 inet6_ioctl+0x21a/0x280 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:579 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f940f07cea9(CVE-2024-40961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: imx: Introduce timeout when waiting on transmitter empty
By waiting at most 1 second for USR2_TXDC to be set, we avoid a potential deadlock.
In case of the timeout, there is not much we can do, so we simply ignore the transmitter state and optimistically try to continue.(CVE-2024-40967)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset
There is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long enough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still complete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler. This runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler. In some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount imbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:
[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669628] Call trace: [10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 [10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0 [10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120 [10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160 [10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0
We can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the beginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting for that job entirely. The irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already done as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency
Validate that first flag is set only for the first
descriptor in multi-buffer packets.
In case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.
A new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: don't walk off the end of a directory data block
This adds sanity checks for xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_entry to make sure don't stray beyond valid memory region. Before patching, the loop simply checks that the start offset of the dup and dep is within the range. So in a crafted image, if last entry is xfs_dir2_data_unused, we can change dup->length to dup->length-1 and leave 1 byte of space. In the next traversal, this space will be considered as dup or dep. We may encounter an out of bound read when accessing the fixed members.
In the patch, we make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold an unused entry before accessing xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_unused is XFS_DIR2_DATA_ALIGN byte aligned. We also make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold a dirent with a single-byte name before accessing xfs_dir2_data_entry.(CVE-2024-41013)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data
There is a lack of verification of the space occupied by fixed members of xlog_op_header in the xlog_recover_process_data.
We can create a crafted image to trigger an out of bounds read by following these steps: 1) Mount an image of xfs, and do some file operations to leave records 2) Before umounting, copy the image for subsequent steps to simulate abnormal exit. Because umount will ensure that tail_blk and head_blk are the same, which will result in the inability to enter xlog_recover_process_data 3) Write a tool to parse and modify the copied image in step 2 4) Make the end of the xlog_op_header entries only 1 byte away from xlog_rec_header->h_size 5) xlog_rec_header->h_num_logops++ 6) Modify xlog_rec_header->h_crc
Fix: Add a check to make sure there is sufficient space to access fixed members of xlog_op_header.(CVE-2024-41014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path
When I wrote commit 3cad1bc01041 ("filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected"), I missed that there are two copies of the code I was patching: The normal version, and the version for 64-bit offsets on 32-bit kernels. Thanks to Greg KH for stumbling over this while doing the stable backport...
Apply exactly the same fix to the compat path for 32-bit kernels.(CVE-2024-41020)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix signedness bug in sdma_v4_0_process_trap_irq()
The "instance" variable needs to be signed for the error handling to work.(CVE-2024-41022)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference leak
During the execution of the following stress test with linux-rt:
stress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30 --minimize --quiet
kmemleak frequently reported a memory leak concerning the task_struct:
unreferenced object 0xffff8881305b8000 (size 16136): comm "stress-ng", pid 614, jiffies 4294883961 (age 286.412s) object hex dump (first 32 bytes): 02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .@.............. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ debug hex dump (first 16 bytes): 53 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 S............... backtrace: [<00000000046b6790>] dup_task_struct+0x30/0x540 [<00000000c5ca0f0b>] copy_process+0x3d9/0x50e0 [<00000000ced59777>] kernel_clone+0xb0/0x770 [<00000000a50befdc>] __do_sys_clone+0xb6/0xf0 [<000000001dbf2008>] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xf0 [<00000000552900ff>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
The issue occurs in start_dl_timer(), which increments the task_struct reference count and sets a timer. The timer callback, dl_task_timer, is supposed to decrement the reference count upon expiration. However, if enqueue_task_dl() is called before the timer expires and cancels it, the reference count is not decremented, leading to the leak.
This patch fixes the reference leak by ensuring the task_struct reference count is properly decremented when the timer is canceled.(CVE-2024-41023)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Fix userfaultfd_api to return EINVAL as expected
Currently if we request a feature that is not set in the Kernel config we fail silently and return all the available features. However, the man page indicates we should return an EINVAL.
We need to fix this issue since we can end up with a Kernel warning should a program request the feature UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED on a kernel with the config not set with this feature.
[ 200.812896] WARNING: CPU: 91 PID: 13634 at mm/memory.c:1660 zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660 [ 200.820738] Modules linked in: [ 200.869387] CPU: 91 PID: 13634 Comm: userfaultfd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #8 [ 200.877477] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6525/0N7YGH, BIOS 2.7.3 03/30/2022 [ 200.885052] RIP: 0010:zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660(CVE-2024-41027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets
Since 'ppp_async_encode()' assumes valid LCP packets (with code from 1 to 7 inclusive), add 'ppp_check_packet()' to ensure that LCP packet has an actual body beyond PPP_LCP header bytes, and reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed data otherwise.(CVE-2024-41044)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: prevent derefencing NULL ptr in pfn_section_valid()
Commit 5ec8e8ea8b77 ("mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage") changed pfn_section_valid() to add a READ_ONCE() call around "ms->usage" to fix a race with section_deactivate() where ms->usage can be cleared. The READ_ONCE() call, by itself, is not enough to prevent NULL pointer dereference. We need to check its value before dereferencing it.(CVE-2024-41055)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release
The problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work, where the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
sock_close hci_rx_work
l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet
l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame
sk_free l2cap_conless_channel
l2cap_sock_recv_cb
If hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is closed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the released sock when receiving data.
Add a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between the sock release and recv cb.
Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.(CVE-2024-41062)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/eeh: avoid possible crash when edev->pdev changes
If a PCI device is removed during eeh_pe_report_edev(), edev->pdev will change and can cause a crash, hold the PCI rescan/remove lock while taking a copy of edev->pdev->bus.(CVE-2024-41064)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ibmvnic: Add tx check to prevent skb leak
Below is a summary of how the driver stores a reference to an skb during transmit: tx_buff[free_map[consumer_index]]->skb = new_skb; free_map[consumer_index] = IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP; consumer_index ++; Where variable data looks like this: free_map == [4, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, 0, 3] consumer_index^ tx_buff == [skb=null, skb=<ptr>, skb=<ptr>, skb=null, skb=null]
The driver has checks to ensure that free_map[consumer_index] pointed to a valid index but there was no check to ensure that this index pointed to an unused/null skb address. So, if, by some chance, our free_map and tx_buff lists become out of sync then we were previously risking an skb memory leak. This could then cause tcp congestion control to stop sending packets, eventually leading to ETIMEDOUT.
Therefore, add a conditional to ensure that the skb address is null. If not then warn the user (because this is still a bug that should be patched) and free the old pointer to prevent memleak/tcp problems.(CVE-2024-41066)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Prevent UAF in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group()
Al reported a possible use-after-free (UAF) in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group().
It looks up stt from tablefd, but then continues to use it after doing
fdput() on the returned fd. After the fdput() the tablefd is free to be
closed by another thread. The close calls kvm_spapr_tce_release() and
then release_spapr_tce_table() (via call_rcu()) which frees stt.
Although there are calls to rcu_read_lock() in
kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group() they are not sufficient to prevent
the UAF, because stt is used outside the locked regions.
With an artifcial delay after the fdput() and a userspace program which triggers the race, KASAN detects the UAF:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm] Read of size 4 at addr c000200027552c30 by task kvm-vfio/2505 CPU: 54 PID: 2505 Comm: kvm-vfio Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240612-dirty #1 Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0x108 (unreliable) print_report+0x2b4/0x6ec kasan_report+0x118/0x2b0 __asan_load4+0xb8/0xd0 kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm] kvm_vfio_set_attr+0x524/0xac0 [kvm] kvm_device_ioctl+0x144/0x240 [kvm] sys_ioctl+0x62c/0x1810 system_call_exception+0x190/0x440 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec ... Freed by task 0: ... kfree+0xec/0x3e0 release_spapr_tce_table+0xd4/0x11c [kvm] rcu_core+0x568/0x16a0 handle_softirqs+0x23c/0x920 do_softirq_own_stack+0x6c/0x90 do_softirq_own_stack+0x58/0x90 __irq_exit_rcu+0x218/0x2d0 irq_exit+0x30/0x80 arch_local_irq_restore+0x128/0x230 arch_local_irq_enable+0x1c/0x30 cpuidle_enter_state+0x134/0x5cc cpuidle_enter+0x6c/0xb0 call_cpuidle+0x7c/0x100 do_idle+0x394/0x410 cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x70 start_secondary+0x3fc/0x410 start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
Fix it by delaying the fdput() until stt is no longer in use, which
is effectively the entire function. To keep the patch minimal add a call
to fdput() at each of the existing return paths. Future work can convert
the function to goto or __cleanup style cleanup.
With the fix in place the test case no longer triggers the UAF.(CVE-2024-41070)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: wext: add extra SIOCSIWSCAN data check
In 'cfg80211_wext_siwscan()', add extra check whether number of channels passed via 'ioctl(sock, SIOCSIWSCAN, ...)' doesn't exceed IW_MAX_FREQUENCIES and reject invalid request with -EINVAL otherwise.(CVE-2024-41072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme: avoid double free special payload
If a discard request needs to be retried, and that retry may fail before a new special payload is added, a double free will result. Clear the RQF_SPECIAL_LOAD when the request is cleaned.(CVE-2024-41073)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
null_blk: fix validation of block size
Block size should be between 512 and PAGE_SIZE and be a power of 2. The current check does not validate this, so update the check.
Without this patch, null_blk would Oops due to a null pointer deref when loaded with bs=1536 [1].
axboe: remove unnecessary braces and != 0 check
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet: always initialize cqe.result
The spec doesn't mandate that the first two double words (aka results) for the command queue entry need to be set to 0 when they are not used (not specified). Though, the target implemention returns 0 for TCP and FC but not for RDMA.
Let's make RDMA behave the same and thus explicitly initializing the result field. This prevents leaking any data from the stack.(CVE-2024-41079)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: block BH in ila_output()
As explained in commit 1378817486d6 ("tipc: block BH before using dst_cache"), net/core/dst_cache.c helpers need to be called with BH disabled.
ila_output() is called from lwtunnel_output() possibly from process context, and under rcu_read_lock().
We might be interrupted by a softirq, re-enter ila_output() and corrupt dst_cache data structures.
Fix the race by using local_bh_disable().(CVE-2024-41081)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ata: libata-core: Fix double free on error
If e.g. the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, we will jump to the err_out label, which will call devres_release_group(). devres_release_group() will trigger a call to ata_host_release(). ata_host_release() calls kfree(host), so executing the kfree(host) in ata_host_alloc() will lead to a double free:
kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:553! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 11 PID: 599 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #47 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 Code: 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 80 d6 ff ff 4d 89 f1 41 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 d9 48 89 da RSP: 0018:ffffc90000f377f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RCX: ffff888112b1f320 RDX: 000000000000400b RSI: ffffffffc02c9de5 RDI: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBP: ffffc90000f37830 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffc90000f37610 R11: 617461203a736b6e R12: ffffea00044ac780 R13: ffff888100046400 R14: ffffffffc02c9de5 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f2f1cabe980(0000) GS:ffff88813b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2f1c3acf75 CR3: 0000000111724000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]
Ensure that we will not call kfree(host) twice, by performing the kfree() only if the devres_open_group() call failed.(CVE-2024-41087)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_hd_modes
In nv17_tv_get_hd_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). The same applies to drm_cvt_mode(). Add a check to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-41089)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: atm: cxacru: fix endpoint checking in cxacru_bind()
Syzbot is still reporting quite an old issue [1] that occurs due to incomplete checking of present usb endpoints. As such, wrong endpoints types may be used at urb sumbitting stage which in turn triggers a warning in usb_submit_urb().
Fix the issue by verifying that required endpoint types are present for both in and out endpoints, taking into account cmd endpoint type.
Unfortunately, this patch has not been tested on real hardware.
[1] Syzbot report: usb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 1 != type 3 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event RIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 ... Call Trace: cxacru_cm+0x3c0/0x8e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:649 cxacru_card_status+0x22/0xd0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:760 cxacru_bind+0x7ac/0x11a0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1209 usbatm_usb_probe+0x321/0x1ae0 drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c:1055 cxacru_usb_probe+0xdf/0x1e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1363 usb_probe_interface+0x315/0x7f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396 call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 [inline] really_probe+0x23c/0xcd0 drivers/base/dd.c:595 __driver_probe_device+0x338/0x4d0 drivers/base/dd.c:747 driver_probe_device+0x4c/0x1a0 drivers/base/dd.c:777 __device_attach_driver+0x20b/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:894 bus_for_each_drv+0x15f/0x1e0 drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach+0x228/0x4a0 drivers/base/dd.c:965 bus_probe_device+0x1e4/0x290 drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add+0xc2f/0x2180 drivers/base/core.c:3354 usb_set_configuration+0x113a/0x1910 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170 usb_generic_driver_probe+0xba/0x100 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238 usb_probe_device+0xd9/0x2c0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293(CVE-2024-41097)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
set_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
Check its return and take it into account as an error.(CVE-2024-42068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: can: j1939: Initialize unused data in j1939_send_one()
syzbot reported kernel-infoleak in raw_recvmsg() [1]. j1939_send_one() creates full frame including unused data, but it doesn't initialize it. This causes the kernel-infoleak issue. Fix this by initializing unused data.
[1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] memcpy_to_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4113 [inline] raw_recvmsg+0x2b8/0x9e0 net/can/raw.c:1008 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 _sysrecvmsg+0x18a/0x620 net/socket.c:2803 _sys_recvmsg+0x223/0x840 net/socket.c:2845 do_recvmmsg+0x4fc/0xfd0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x397/0x490 net/socket.c:3034 x64_sys_call+0xf6c/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1842 [inline] j1939_sk_alloc_skb net/can/j1939/socket.c:878 [inline] j1939_sk_send_loop net/can/j1939/socket.c:1142 [inline] j1939_sk_sendmsg+0xc0a/0x2730 net/can/j1939/socket.c:1277 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 x64_sys_call+0xc4b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Bytes 12-15 of 16 are uninitialized Memory access of size 16 starts at ffff888120969690 Data copied to user address 00000000200017c0
CPU: 1 PID: 5050 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00031-g71b1543c83d6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024(CVE-2024-42076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits
The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can contain arbitrary number of extents.
Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not in all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if the IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to this error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.
To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().
Heming Zhao said:
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error"
PID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA" #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932 #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9 #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2] #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2] #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2] #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2] #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2] #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]
10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]
11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7
12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f
13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]
14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14
15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b
16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]
17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e
18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde
19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada
20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984
21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba(CVE-2024-42077)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access
struct rdma_restrack_entry's kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME in ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this rdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in rdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.
These code is used to help find one forgotten PD release in one of the ULPs. But it is not needed anymore, so delete them.(CVE-2024-42080)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()
syzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().
The warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It returns the error in two cases:
- memory allocation fails;
- rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params struct are not initialized properly.
The second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params struct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a problem with memory allocation.
Thus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be safely removed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
CPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
Call Trace: xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344 xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267 bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240 __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.(CVE-2024-42082)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftruncate: pass a signed offset
The old ftruncate() syscall, using the 32-bit off_t misses a sign extension when called in compat mode on 64-bit architectures. As a result, passing a negative length accidentally succeeds in truncating to file size between 2GiB and 4GiB.
Changing the type of the compat syscall to the signed compat_off_t changes the behavior so it instead returns -EINVAL.
The native entry point, the truncate() syscall and the corresponding loff_t based variants are all correct already and do not suffer from this mistake.(CVE-2024-42084)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: set priv->pdev before using it
priv->pdev pointer was set after being used in fsl_asoc_card_audmux_init(). Move this assignment at the start of the probe function, so sub-functions can correctly use pdev through priv.
fsl_asoc_card_audmux_init() dereferences priv->pdev to get access to the dev struct, used with dev_err macros. As priv is zero-initialised, there would be a NULL pointer dereference. Note that if priv->dev is dereferenced before assignment but never used, for example if there is no error to be printed, the driver won't crash probably due to compiler optimisations.(CVE-2024-42089)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: fix deadlock in create_pinctrl() when handling -EPROBE_DEFER
In create_pinctrl(), pinctrl_maps_mutex is acquired before calling add_setting(). If add_setting() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, create_pinctrl() calls pinctrl_free(). However, pinctrl_free() attempts to acquire pinctrl_maps_mutex, which is already held by create_pinctrl(), leading to a potential deadlock.
This patch resolves the issue by releasing pinctrl_maps_mutex before calling pinctrl_free(), preventing the deadlock.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-42090)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: davinci: Validate the obtained number of IRQs
Value of pdata->gpio_unbanked is taken from Device Tree. In case of broken DT due to any error this value can be any. Without this value validation there can be out of chips->irqs array boundaries access in davinci_gpio_probe().
Validate the obtained nirq value so that it won't exceed the maximum number of IRQs per bank.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42092)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/dpaa2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42093)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in nouveau_connector_get_modes
In nouveau_connector_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42101)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet_diag: Initialize pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in raw_lookup() [1]. Diag for raw sockets uses the pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2 for the underlying protocol. This field corresponds to the sdiag_raw_protocol field in struct inet_diag_req_raw.
inet_diag_get_exact_compat() converts inet_diag_req to inet_diag_req_v2, but leaves the pad field uninitialized. So the issue occurs when raw_lookup() accesses the sdiag_raw_protocol field.
Fix this by initializing the pad field in inet_diag_get_exact_compat(). Also, do the same fix in inet_diag_dump_compat() to avoid the similar issue in the future.
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 _sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was stored to memory at: raw_sock_get+0x650/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 _sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Local variable req.i created at: inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1396 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2a6/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282
CPU: 1 PID: 8888 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-42106)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedf: Make qedf_execute_tmf() non-preemptible
Stop calling smp_processor_id() from preemptible code in qedf_execute_tmf90. This results in BUG_ON() when running an RT kernel.
[ 659.343280] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sg_reset/3646 [ 659.343282] caller is qedf_execute_tmf+0x8b/0x360 qedf
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure again for QCA6390 after warm reboot
Commit 272970be3dab ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix driver shutdown on closed serdev") will cause below regression issue:
BT can't be enabled after below steps: cold boot -> enable BT -> disable BT -> warm reboot -> BT enable failure if property enable-gpios is not configured within DT|ACPI for QCA6390.
The commit is to fix a use-after-free issue within qca_serdev_shutdown() by adding condition to avoid the serdev is flushed or wrote after closed but also introduces this regression issue regarding above steps since the VSC is not sent to reset controller during warm reboot.
Fixed by sending the VSC to reset controller within qca_serdev_shutdown() once BT was ever enabled, and the use-after-free issue is also fixed by this change since the serdev is still opened before it is flushed or wrote.
Verified by the reported machine Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop over below two kernel commits: commit e00fc2700a3f ("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump implementation for QCA") of bluetooth-next tree. commit b23d98d46d28 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump implementation for QCA") of linus mainline tree.(CVE-2024-42137)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List
The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth. As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading to potential list overflow.
To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed out by the time they are handled by user-space.
Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.(CVE-2024-42145)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe copies of protected- and secure-keys
Although the clear-key of neither protected- nor secure-keys is accessible, this key material should only be visible to the calling process. So wipe all copies of protected- or secure-keys from stack, even in case of an error.(CVE-2024-42155)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()
- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(), let's fix to add check condition in f2fs_build_fault_attr().
- Use f2fs_build_fault_attr() in __sbi_store() to clean up code.(CVE-2024-42160)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Avoid uninitialized value in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD
[Changes from V1: - Use a default branch in the switch statement to initialize `val'.]
GCC warns that `val' may be used uninitialized in the BPF_CRE_READ_BITFIELD macro, defined in bpf_core_read.h as:
[...]
unsigned long long val; \
[...] \
switch (__CORE_RELO(s, field, BYTE_SIZE)) { \
case 1: val = *(const unsigned char *)p; break; \
case 2: val = *(const unsigned short *)p; break; \
case 4: val = *(const unsigned int *)p; break; \
case 8: val = *(const unsigned long long *)p; break; \
} \
[...]
val; \
} \
This patch adds a default entry in the switch statement that sets `val' to zero in order to avoid the warning, and random values to be used in case __builtin_preserve_field_info returns unexpected values for BPF_FIELD_BYTE_SIZE.
Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions.(CVE-2024-42161)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gve: Account for stopped queues when reading NIC stats
We now account for the fact that the NIC might send us stats for a subset of queues. Without this change, gve_get_ethtool_stats might make an invalid access on the priv->stats_report->stats array.(CVE-2024-42162)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Correct check for empty list
Since commit a3c53be55c95 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO busses") mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus() has checked that the return value of list_first_entry() is non-NULL.
This appears to be intended to guard against the list chip->mdios being empty. However, it is not the correct check as the implementation of list_first_entry is not designed to return NULL for empty lists.
Instead, use list_first_entry_or_null() which does return NULL if the list is empty.
Flagged by Smatch. Compile tested only.(CVE-2024-42224)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-222.0.0.121.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\r\n\r\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u0026gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\u0026quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u0026gt; the RPC read layers\u0026quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u0026gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u0026gt;\n\u0026gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u0026gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u0026gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u0026gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.\r\n\r\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\r\n\r\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\r\n\r\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new\r\n\r\nThis patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to\nSend) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE\nbacktraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error\nmessages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions.\nPreviously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().\r\n\r\nPotentially this could be reproduced with something like:\ntestj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 \u0026amp;\nwhile true; do\n\t# send first RTS\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301;\n\t# send second RTS\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301;\n\t# send abort\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301;\ndone(CVE-2023-52887)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkunit: Fix kthread reference\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition when a kthread finishes after the deadline and\nbefore the call to kthread_stop(), which may lead to use after free.(CVE-2024-38561)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv\r\n\r\nReinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex\nlock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger\nthe following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct\nstmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing\nthis initialization.\r\n\r\nDEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u0026gt;magic != lock)\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29\n Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT)\n pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n sp : ffffffc0864e3570\n x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003\n x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac\n x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000\n x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8\n x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698\n x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001\n x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027\n x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Call trace:\n __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34\n tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c\n stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0\n taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nstm class: Fix a double free in stm_register_device()\r\n\r\nThe put_device(\u0026amp;stm-\u0026gt;dev) call will trigger stm_device_release() which\nfrees \u0026quot;stm\u0026quot; so the vfree(stm) on the next line is a double free.(CVE-2024-38627)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/shmem-helper: Fix BUG_ON() on mmap(PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE)\r\n\r\nLack of check for copy-on-write (COW) mapping in drm_gem_shmem_mmap\nallows users to call mmap with PROT_WRITE and MAP_PRIVATE flag\ncausing a kernel panic due to BUG_ON in vmf_insert_pfn_prot:\nBUG_ON((vma-\u0026gt;vm_flags \u0026amp; VM_PFNMAP) \u0026amp;\u0026amp; is_cow_mapping(vma-\u0026gt;vm_flags));\r\n\r\nReturn -EINVAL early if COW mapping is detected.\r\n\r\nThis bug affects all drm drivers using default shmem helpers.\nIt can be reproduced by this simple example:\nvoid *ptr = mmap(0, size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, mmap_offset);\nptr[0] = 0;(CVE-2024-39497)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections\r\n\r\nWhen releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to\ndecrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the\nexecution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls\nnetdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately\nto kernel crashes.\r\n\r\nA typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the\nfollowing errors:\r\n\r\n refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\r\n\r\nAnd will then have a trace like:\r\n\r\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0x64/0x70\n ? __warn+0x83/0x120\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? report_bug+0x158/0x190\n ? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30\n ? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360\n __sock_release+0x35/0xa0\n sock_close+0x19/0x20\n [...]\r\n\r\nOn reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets\nstuck in an infinite loop:\r\n\r\n unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0\r\n\r\nThis patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold()\nand ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the\nlogic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both\ncases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in\nax25_release().(CVE-2024-40910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()\r\n\r\nip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nWorkqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker\n RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64\nCode: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98\nRBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000\nR10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541\n xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835\n xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201\n xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256\n send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139\n wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178\n wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200\n wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40\n wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51\n process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393\n kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent possible NULL deref in fib6_nh_init()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reminds us that in6_dev_get() can return NULL.\r\n\r\nfib6_nh_init()\n ip6_validate_gw( \u0026amp;idev )\n ip6_route_check_nh( idev )\n *idev = in6_dev_get(dev); // can be NULL\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 11237 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00249-gbe27b8965297 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024\n RIP: 0010:fib6_nh_init+0x640/0x2160 net/ipv6/route.c:3606\nCode: 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 64 24 58 48 8b 44 24 28 4c 8b 74 24 30 48 89 c1 48 89 44 24 28 48 8d 98 e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 0f 85 b3 17 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff 89 de e8 b8 8b\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900032775a0 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffc90003277a54 RDI: ffff88802b3a08d8\nRBP: ffffc900032778b0 R08: 00000000000002fc R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 00000000000002fc R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88802b3a08b8\nR13: 1ffff9200064eec8 R14: ffffc90003277a00 R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f940feb06c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000245e8000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ip6_route_info_create+0x99e/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3809\n ip6_route_add+0x28/0x160 net/ipv6/route.c:3853\n ipv6_route_ioctl+0x588/0x870 net/ipv6/route.c:4483\n inet6_ioctl+0x21a/0x280 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:579\n sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222\n sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f940f07cea9(CVE-2024-40961)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: imx: Introduce timeout when waiting on transmitter empty\r\n\r\nBy waiting at most 1 second for USR2_TXDC to be set, we avoid a potential\ndeadlock.\r\n\r\nIn case of the timeout, there is not much we can do, so we simply ignore\nthe transmitter state and optimistically try to continue.(CVE-2024-40967)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long\nenough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still\ncomplete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler.\nThis runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler.\nIn some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount\nimbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:\r\n\r\n[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669628] Call trace:\n[10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n[10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0\n[10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120\n[10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160\n[10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0\r\n\r\nWe can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the\nbeginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting\nfor that job entirely.\nThe irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already\ndone as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency\r\n\r\nValidate that `first` flag is set only for the first\ndescriptor in multi-buffer packets.\nIn case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.\nA new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfs: don\u0026apos;t walk off the end of a directory data block\r\n\r\nThis adds sanity checks for xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_entry\nto make sure don\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory region. Before patching, the\nloop simply checks that the start offset of the dup and dep is within the\nrange. So in a crafted image, if last entry is xfs_dir2_data_unused, we\ncan change dup-\u0026gt;length to dup-\u0026gt;length-1 and leave 1 byte of space. In the\nnext traversal, this space will be considered as dup or dep. We may\nencounter an out of bound read when accessing the fixed members.\r\n\r\nIn the patch, we make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold\nan unused entry before accessing xfs_dir2_data_unused and\nxfs_dir2_data_unused is XFS_DIR2_DATA_ALIGN byte aligned. We also make\nsure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold a dirent with a\nsingle-byte name before accessing xfs_dir2_data_entry.(CVE-2024-41013)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data\r\n\r\nThere is a lack of verification of the space occupied by fixed members\nof xlog_op_header in the xlog_recover_process_data.\r\n\r\nWe can create a crafted image to trigger an out of bounds read by\nfollowing these steps:\n 1) Mount an image of xfs, and do some file operations to leave records\n 2) Before umounting, copy the image for subsequent steps to simulate\n abnormal exit. Because umount will ensure that tail_blk and\n head_blk are the same, which will result in the inability to enter\n xlog_recover_process_data\n 3) Write a tool to parse and modify the copied image in step 2\n 4) Make the end of the xlog_op_header entries only 1 byte away from\n xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_size\n 5) xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_num_logops++\n 6) Modify xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_crc\r\n\r\nFix:\nAdd a check to make sure there is sufficient space to access fixed members\nof xlog_op_header.(CVE-2024-41014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfilelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path\r\n\r\nWhen I wrote commit 3cad1bc01041 (\u0026quot;filelock: Remove locks reliably when\nfcntl/close race is detected\u0026quot;), I missed that there are two copies of the\ncode I was patching: The normal version, and the version for 64-bit offsets\non 32-bit kernels.\nThanks to Greg KH for stumbling over this while doing the stable\nbackport...\r\n\r\nApply exactly the same fix to the compat path for 32-bit kernels.(CVE-2024-41020)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix signedness bug in sdma_v4_0_process_trap_irq()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;instance\u0026quot; variable needs to be signed for the error handling to work.(CVE-2024-41022)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference leak\r\n\r\nDuring the execution of the following stress test with linux-rt:\r\n\r\nstress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30 --minimize --quiet\r\n\r\nkmemleak frequently reported a memory leak concerning the task_struct:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff8881305b8000 (size 16136):\n comm \u0026quot;stress-ng\u0026quot;, pid 614, jiffies 4294883961 (age 286.412s)\n object hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .@..............\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n debug hex dump (first 16 bytes):\n 53 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 S...............\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;00000000046b6790\u0026gt;] dup_task_struct+0x30/0x540\n [\u0026lt;00000000c5ca0f0b\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x3d9/0x50e0\n [\u0026lt;00000000ced59777\u0026gt;] kernel_clone+0xb0/0x770\n [\u0026lt;00000000a50befdc\u0026gt;] __do_sys_clone+0xb6/0xf0\n [\u0026lt;000000001dbf2008\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xf0\n [\u0026lt;00000000552900ff\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\r\n\r\nThe issue occurs in start_dl_timer(), which increments the task_struct\nreference count and sets a timer. The timer callback, dl_task_timer,\nis supposed to decrement the reference count upon expiration. However,\nif enqueue_task_dl() is called before the timer expires and cancels it,\nthe reference count is not decremented, leading to the leak.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes the reference leak by ensuring the task_struct\nreference count is properly decremented when the timer is canceled.(CVE-2024-41023)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nFix userfaultfd_api to return EINVAL as expected\r\n\r\nCurrently if we request a feature that is not set in the Kernel config we\nfail silently and return all the available features. However, the man\npage indicates we should return an EINVAL.\r\n\r\nWe need to fix this issue since we can end up with a Kernel warning should\na program request the feature UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED on a kernel with\nthe config not set with this feature.\r\n\r\n [ 200.812896] WARNING: CPU: 91 PID: 13634 at mm/memory.c:1660 zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660\n [ 200.820738] Modules linked in:\n [ 200.869387] CPU: 91 PID: 13634 Comm: userfaultfd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #8\n [ 200.877477] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6525/0N7YGH, BIOS 2.7.3 03/30/2022\n [ 200.885052] RIP: 0010:zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660(CVE-2024-41027)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets\r\n\r\nSince \u0026apos;ppp_async_encode()\u0026apos; assumes valid LCP packets (with code\nfrom 1 to 7 inclusive), add \u0026apos;ppp_check_packet()\u0026apos; to ensure that\nLCP packet has an actual body beyond PPP_LCP header bytes, and\nreject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed data otherwise.(CVE-2024-41044)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm: prevent derefencing NULL ptr in pfn_section_valid()\r\n\r\nCommit 5ec8e8ea8b77 (\u0026quot;mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing\nmemory_section-\u0026gt;usage\u0026quot;) changed pfn_section_valid() to add a READ_ONCE()\ncall around \u0026quot;ms-\u0026gt;usage\u0026quot; to fix a race with section_deactivate() where\nms-\u0026gt;usage can be cleared. The READ_ONCE() call, by itself, is not enough\nto prevent NULL pointer dereference. We need to check its value before\ndereferencing it.(CVE-2024-41055)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release\r\n\r\nThe problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work,\nwhere the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n sock_close hci_rx_work\n\t l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet\n\t l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame\n\t sk_free l2cap_conless_channel\n\t l2cap_sock_recv_cb\r\n\r\nIf hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is\nclosed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the\nreleased sock when receiving data.\r\n\r\nAdd a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between\nthe sock release and recv cb.\r\n\r\nSock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.(CVE-2024-41062)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/eeh: avoid possible crash when edev-\u0026gt;pdev changes\r\n\r\nIf a PCI device is removed during eeh_pe_report_edev(), edev-\u0026gt;pdev\nwill change and can cause a crash, hold the PCI rescan/remove lock\nwhile taking a copy of edev-\u0026gt;pdev-\u0026gt;bus.(CVE-2024-41064)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nibmvnic: Add tx check to prevent skb leak\r\n\r\nBelow is a summary of how the driver stores a reference to an skb during\ntransmit:\n tx_buff[free_map[consumer_index]]-\u0026gt;skb = new_skb;\n free_map[consumer_index] = IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP;\n consumer_index ++;\nWhere variable data looks like this:\n free_map == [4, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, 0, 3]\n \tconsumer_index^\n tx_buff == [skb=null, skb=\u0026lt;ptr\u0026gt;, skb=\u0026lt;ptr\u0026gt;, skb=null, skb=null]\r\n\r\nThe driver has checks to ensure that free_map[consumer_index] pointed to\na valid index but there was no check to ensure that this index pointed\nto an unused/null skb address. So, if, by some chance, our free_map and\ntx_buff lists become out of sync then we were previously risking an\nskb memory leak. This could then cause tcp congestion control to stop\nsending packets, eventually leading to ETIMEDOUT.\r\n\r\nTherefore, add a conditional to ensure that the skb address is null. If\nnot then warn the user (because this is still a bug that should be\npatched) and free the old pointer to prevent memleak/tcp problems.(CVE-2024-41066)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Prevent UAF in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group()\r\n\r\nAl reported a possible use-after-free (UAF) in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group().\r\n\r\nIt looks up `stt` from tablefd, but then continues to use it after doing\nfdput() on the returned fd. After the fdput() the tablefd is free to be\nclosed by another thread. The close calls kvm_spapr_tce_release() and\nthen release_spapr_tce_table() (via call_rcu()) which frees `stt`.\r\n\r\nAlthough there are calls to rcu_read_lock() in\nkvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group() they are not sufficient to prevent\nthe UAF, because `stt` is used outside the locked regions.\r\n\r\nWith an artifcial delay after the fdput() and a userspace program which\ntriggers the race, KASAN detects the UAF:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm]\n Read of size 4 at addr c000200027552c30 by task kvm-vfio/2505\n CPU: 54 PID: 2505 Comm: kvm-vfio Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240612-dirty #1\n Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0x108 (unreliable)\n print_report+0x2b4/0x6ec\n kasan_report+0x118/0x2b0\n __asan_load4+0xb8/0xd0\n kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm]\n kvm_vfio_set_attr+0x524/0xac0 [kvm]\n kvm_device_ioctl+0x144/0x240 [kvm]\n sys_ioctl+0x62c/0x1810\n system_call_exception+0x190/0x440\n system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec\n ...\n Freed by task 0:\n ...\n kfree+0xec/0x3e0\n release_spapr_tce_table+0xd4/0x11c [kvm]\n rcu_core+0x568/0x16a0\n handle_softirqs+0x23c/0x920\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x6c/0x90\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x58/0x90\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x218/0x2d0\n irq_exit+0x30/0x80\n arch_local_irq_restore+0x128/0x230\n arch_local_irq_enable+0x1c/0x30\n cpuidle_enter_state+0x134/0x5cc\n cpuidle_enter+0x6c/0xb0\n call_cpuidle+0x7c/0x100\n do_idle+0x394/0x410\n cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x70\n start_secondary+0x3fc/0x410\n start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14\r\n\r\nFix it by delaying the fdput() until `stt` is no longer in use, which\nis effectively the entire function. To keep the patch minimal add a call\nto fdput() at each of the existing return paths. Future work can convert\nthe function to goto or __cleanup style cleanup.\r\n\r\nWith the fix in place the test case no longer triggers the UAF.(CVE-2024-41070)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: wext: add extra SIOCSIWSCAN data check\r\n\r\nIn \u0026apos;cfg80211_wext_siwscan()\u0026apos;, add extra check whether number of\nchannels passed via \u0026apos;ioctl(sock, SIOCSIWSCAN, ...)\u0026apos; doesn\u0026apos;t exceed\nIW_MAX_FREQUENCIES and reject invalid request with -EINVAL otherwise.(CVE-2024-41072)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme: avoid double free special payload\r\n\r\nIf a discard request needs to be retried, and that retry may fail before\na new special payload is added, a double free will result. Clear the\nRQF_SPECIAL_LOAD when the request is cleaned.(CVE-2024-41073)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnull_blk: fix validation of block size\r\n\r\nBlock size should be between 512 and PAGE_SIZE and be a power of 2. The current\ncheck does not validate this, so update the check.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, null_blk would Oops due to a null pointer deref when\nloaded with bs=1536 [1].\r\n\r\n\n[axboe: remove unnecessary braces and != 0 check](CVE-2024-41077)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvmet: always initialize cqe.result\r\n\r\nThe spec doesn\u0026apos;t mandate that the first two double words (aka results)\nfor the command queue entry need to be set to 0 when they are not\nused (not specified). Though, the target implemention returns 0 for TCP\nand FC but not for RDMA.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s make RDMA behave the same and thus explicitly initializing the\nresult field. This prevents leaking any data from the stack.(CVE-2024-41079)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nila: block BH in ila_output()\r\n\r\nAs explained in commit 1378817486d6 (\u0026quot;tipc: block BH\nbefore using dst_cache\u0026quot;), net/core/dst_cache.c\nhelpers need to be called with BH disabled.\r\n\r\nila_output() is called from lwtunnel_output()\npossibly from process context, and under rcu_read_lock().\r\n\r\nWe might be interrupted by a softirq, re-enter ila_output()\nand corrupt dst_cache data structures.\r\n\r\nFix the race by using local_bh_disable().(CVE-2024-41081)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nata: libata-core: Fix double free on error\r\n\r\nIf e.g. the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, we will jump\nto the err_out label, which will call devres_release_group().\ndevres_release_group() will trigger a call to ata_host_release().\nata_host_release() calls kfree(host), so executing the kfree(host) in\nata_host_alloc() will lead to a double free:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at mm/slub.c:553!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 11 PID: 599 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #47\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\nCode: 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 80 d6 ff ff 4d 89 f1 41 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 d9 48 89 da\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000f377f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RCX: ffff888112b1f320\nRDX: 000000000000400b RSI: ffffffffc02c9de5 RDI: ffff888112b1f2c0\nRBP: ffffc90000f37830 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc90000f37610 R11: 617461203a736b6e R12: ffffea00044ac780\nR13: ffff888100046400 R14: ffffffffc02c9de5 R15: 0000000000000006\nFS: 00007f2f1cabe980(0000) GS:ffff88813b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f2f1c3acf75 CR3: 0000000111724000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27\n ? die+0x2e/0x50\n ? do_trap+0xca/0x110\n ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata]\n ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]\r\n\r\nEnsure that we will not call kfree(host) twice, by performing the kfree()\nonly if the devres_open_group() call failed.(CVE-2024-41087)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_hd_modes\r\n\r\nIn nv17_tv_get_hd_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). The same applies to drm_cvt_mode().\nAdd a check to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-41089)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: atm: cxacru: fix endpoint checking in cxacru_bind()\r\n\r\nSyzbot is still reporting quite an old issue [1] that occurs due to\nincomplete checking of present usb endpoints. As such, wrong\nendpoints types may be used at urb sumbitting stage which in turn\ntriggers a warning in usb_submit_urb().\r\n\r\nFix the issue by verifying that required endpoint types are present\nfor both in and out endpoints, taking into account cmd endpoint type.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, this patch has not been tested on real hardware.\r\n\r\n[1] Syzbot report:\nusb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 1 != type 3\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 8667 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nWorkqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event\nRIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502\n...\nCall Trace:\n cxacru_cm+0x3c0/0x8e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:649\n cxacru_card_status+0x22/0xd0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:760\n cxacru_bind+0x7ac/0x11a0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1209\n usbatm_usb_probe+0x321/0x1ae0 drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c:1055\n cxacru_usb_probe+0xdf/0x1e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1363\n usb_probe_interface+0x315/0x7f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 [inline]\n really_probe+0x23c/0xcd0 drivers/base/dd.c:595\n __driver_probe_device+0x338/0x4d0 drivers/base/dd.c:747\n driver_probe_device+0x4c/0x1a0 drivers/base/dd.c:777\n __device_attach_driver+0x20b/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:894\n bus_for_each_drv+0x15f/0x1e0 drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach+0x228/0x4a0 drivers/base/dd.c:965\n bus_probe_device+0x1e4/0x290 drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add+0xc2f/0x2180 drivers/base/core.c:3354\n usb_set_configuration+0x113a/0x1910 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170\n usb_generic_driver_probe+0xba/0x100 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238\n usb_probe_device+0xd9/0x2c0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293(CVE-2024-41097)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()\r\n\r\nset_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.\r\n\r\nCheck its return and take it into account as an error.(CVE-2024-42068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: can: j1939: Initialize unused data in j1939_send_one()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported kernel-infoleak in raw_recvmsg() [1]. j1939_send_one()\ncreates full frame including unused data, but it doesn\u0026apos;t initialize\nit. This causes the kernel-infoleak issue. Fix this by initializing\nunused data.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline]\n memcpy_to_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4113 [inline]\n raw_recvmsg+0x2b8/0x9e0 net/can/raw.c:1008\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068\n ____sys_recvmsg+0x18a/0x620 net/socket.c:2803\n ___sys_recvmsg+0x223/0x840 net/socket.c:2845\n do_recvmmsg+0x4fc/0xfd0 net/socket.c:2939\n __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline]\n __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x397/0x490 net/socket.c:3034\n x64_sys_call+0xf6c/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:300\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1842 [inline]\n j1939_sk_alloc_skb net/can/j1939/socket.c:878 [inline]\n j1939_sk_send_loop net/can/j1939/socket.c:1142 [inline]\n j1939_sk_sendmsg+0xc0a/0x2730 net/can/j1939/socket.c:1277\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674\n x64_sys_call+0xc4b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nBytes 12-15 of 16 are uninitialized\nMemory access of size 16 starts at ffff888120969690\nData copied to user address 00000000200017c0\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5050 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00031-g71b1543c83d6 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024(CVE-2024-42076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits\r\n\r\nThe code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary\ntransaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does\nnot take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can\ncontain arbitrary number of extents.\r\n\r\nExtent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not\nin all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in\nthe tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling\nocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the\ncurrent transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if\nthe IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a\nWARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) \u0026lt;= 0) is triggered in\njbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to\nthis error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a\nheavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for\none extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().\r\n\r\nHeming Zhao said:\r\n\r\n------\nPANIC: \u0026quot;Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nPID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: \u0026quot;SubmitThread-CA\u0026quot;\n #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932\n #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa\n #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9\n #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2]\n #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2]\n #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2]\n #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2]\n #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2]\n #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2]\n #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]\n#10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]\n#11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7\n#12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f\n#13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]\n#14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14\n#15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b\n#16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]\n#17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e\n#18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde\n#19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada\n#20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984\n#21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba(CVE-2024-42077)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access\r\n\r\nstruct rdma_restrack_entry\u0026apos;s kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME\nin ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this\nrdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in\nrdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.\r\n\r\nThese code is used to help find one forgotten PD release in one of the\nULPs. But it is not needed anymore, so delete them.(CVE-2024-42080)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().\r\n\r\nThe warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It\nreturns the error in two cases:\r\n\r\n 1. memory allocation fails;\n 2. rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params\n struct are not initialized properly.\r\n\r\nThe second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params\nstruct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a\nproblem with memory allocation.\r\n\r\nThus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be\nsafely removed.\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nRIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\r\n\r\nCall Trace:\n xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344\n xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline]\n bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377\n bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240\n __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.(CVE-2024-42082)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nftruncate: pass a signed offset\r\n\r\nThe old ftruncate() syscall, using the 32-bit off_t misses a sign\nextension when called in compat mode on 64-bit architectures. As a\nresult, passing a negative length accidentally succeeds in truncating\nto file size between 2GiB and 4GiB.\r\n\r\nChanging the type of the compat syscall to the signed compat_off_t\nchanges the behavior so it instead returns -EINVAL.\r\n\r\nThe native entry point, the truncate() syscall and the corresponding\nloff_t based variants are all correct already and do not suffer\nfrom this mistake.(CVE-2024-42084)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: fsl-asoc-card: set priv-\u0026gt;pdev before using it\r\n\r\npriv-\u0026gt;pdev pointer was set after being used in\nfsl_asoc_card_audmux_init().\nMove this assignment at the start of the probe function, so\nsub-functions can correctly use pdev through priv.\r\n\r\nfsl_asoc_card_audmux_init() dereferences priv-\u0026gt;pdev to get access to the\ndev struct, used with dev_err macros.\nAs priv is zero-initialised, there would be a NULL pointer dereference.\nNote that if priv-\u0026gt;dev is dereferenced before assignment but never used,\nfor example if there is no error to be printed, the driver won\u0026apos;t crash\nprobably due to compiler optimisations.(CVE-2024-42089)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: fix deadlock in create_pinctrl() when handling -EPROBE_DEFER\r\n\r\nIn create_pinctrl(), pinctrl_maps_mutex is acquired before calling\nadd_setting(). If add_setting() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, create_pinctrl()\ncalls pinctrl_free(). However, pinctrl_free() attempts to acquire\npinctrl_maps_mutex, which is already held by create_pinctrl(), leading to\na potential deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis patch resolves the issue by releasing pinctrl_maps_mutex before\ncalling pinctrl_free(), preventing the deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-42090)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: davinci: Validate the obtained number of IRQs\r\n\r\nValue of pdata-\u0026gt;gpio_unbanked is taken from Device Tree. In case of broken\nDT due to any error this value can be any. Without this value validation\nthere can be out of chips-\u0026gt;irqs array boundaries access in\ndavinci_gpio_probe().\r\n\r\nValidate the obtained nirq value so that it won\u0026apos;t exceed the maximum\nnumber of IRQs per bank.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42092)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/dpaa2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack\r\n\r\nFor CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask\nvariable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack\noverflow.\r\n\r\nInstead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate\ncpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to\nCONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.\r\n\r\nUse *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42093)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack\r\n\r\nFor CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask\nvariable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack\noverflow.\r\n\r\nInstead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate\ncpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to\nCONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.\r\n\r\nUse *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in nouveau_connector_get_modes\r\n\r\nIn nouveau_connector_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate()\nis assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer\ndereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42101)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninet_diag: Initialize pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in raw_lookup() [1]. Diag for raw\nsockets uses the pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2 for the\nunderlying protocol. This field corresponds to the sdiag_raw_protocol\nfield in struct inet_diag_req_raw.\r\n\r\ninet_diag_get_exact_compat() converts inet_diag_req to\ninet_diag_req_v2, but leaves the pad field uninitialized. So the issue\noccurs when raw_lookup() accesses the sdiag_raw_protocol field.\r\n\r\nFix this by initializing the pad field in\ninet_diag_get_exact_compat(). Also, do the same fix in\ninet_diag_dump_compat() to avoid the similar issue in the future.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline]\n raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99\n inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564\n sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675\n x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n raw_sock_get+0x650/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99\n inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564\n sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675\n x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nLocal variable req.i created at:\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1396 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2a6/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8888 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-42106)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedf: Make qedf_execute_tmf() non-preemptible\r\n\r\nStop calling smp_processor_id() from preemptible code in\nqedf_execute_tmf90. This results in BUG_ON() when running an RT kernel.\r\n\r\n[ 659.343280] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sg_reset/3646\n[ 659.343282] caller is qedf_execute_tmf+0x8b/0x360 [qedf](CVE-2024-42124)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure again for QCA6390 after warm reboot\r\n\r\nCommit 272970be3dab (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix driver shutdown on closed\nserdev\u0026quot;) will cause below regression issue:\r\n\r\nBT can\u0026apos;t be enabled after below steps:\ncold boot -\u0026gt; enable BT -\u0026gt; disable BT -\u0026gt; warm reboot -\u0026gt; BT enable failure\nif property enable-gpios is not configured within DT|ACPI for QCA6390.\r\n\r\nThe commit is to fix a use-after-free issue within qca_serdev_shutdown()\nby adding condition to avoid the serdev is flushed or wrote after closed\nbut also introduces this regression issue regarding above steps since the\nVSC is not sent to reset controller during warm reboot.\r\n\r\nFixed by sending the VSC to reset controller within qca_serdev_shutdown()\nonce BT was ever enabled, and the use-after-free issue is also fixed by\nthis change since the serdev is still opened before it is flushed or wrote.\r\n\r\nVerified by the reported machine Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop over below two\nkernel commits:\ncommit e00fc2700a3f (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump\nimplementation for QCA\u0026quot;) of bluetooth-next tree.\ncommit b23d98d46d28 (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump\nimplementation for QCA\u0026quot;) of linus mainline tree.(CVE-2024-42137)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List\r\n\r\nThe existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD\npackets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth.\nAs user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate\nof extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading\nto potential list overflow.\r\n\r\nTo address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After\nconsidering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can\nhandle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry\ntimeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets\nreceived beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed\nout by the time they are handled by user-space.\r\n\r\nNotably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like\ntimed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.(CVE-2024-42145)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe copies of protected- and secure-keys\r\n\r\nAlthough the clear-key of neither protected- nor secure-keys is\naccessible, this key material should only be visible to the calling\nprocess. So wipe all copies of protected- or secure-keys from stack,\neven in case of an error.(CVE-2024-42155)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()\r\n\r\n- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(),\nlet\u0026apos;s fix to add check condition in f2fs_build_fault_attr().\n- Use f2fs_build_fault_attr() in __sbi_store() to clean up code.(CVE-2024-42160)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Avoid uninitialized value in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD\r\n\r\n[Changes from V1:\n - Use a default branch in the switch statement to initialize `val\u0026apos;.]\r\n\r\nGCC warns that `val\u0026apos; may be used uninitialized in the\nBPF_CRE_READ_BITFIELD macro, defined in bpf_core_read.h as:\r\n\r\n\t[...]\n\tunsigned long long val;\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t[...]\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\tswitch (__CORE_RELO(s, field, BYTE_SIZE)) {\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 1: val = *(const unsigned char *)p; break;\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 2: val = *(const unsigned short *)p; break;\t\t \\\n\tcase 4: val = *(const unsigned int *)p; break;\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 8: val = *(const unsigned long long *)p; break;\t\t \\\n } \t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t[...]\n\tval;\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t}\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a default entry in the switch statement that sets\n`val\u0026apos; to zero in order to avoid the warning, and random values to be\nused in case __builtin_preserve_field_info returns unexpected values\nfor BPF_FIELD_BYTE_SIZE.\r\n\r\nTested in bpf-next master.\nNo regressions.(CVE-2024-42161)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngve: Account for stopped queues when reading NIC stats\r\n\r\nWe now account for the fact that the NIC might send us stats for a\nsubset of queues. Without this change, gve_get_ethtool_stats might make\nan invalid access on the priv-\u0026gt;stats_report-\u0026gt;stats array.(CVE-2024-42162)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Correct check for empty list\r\n\r\nSince commit a3c53be55c95 (\u0026quot;net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO\nbusses\u0026quot;) mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus() has checked that the\nreturn value of list_first_entry() is non-NULL.\r\n\r\nThis appears to be intended to guard against the list chip-\u0026gt;mdios being\nempty. However, it is not the correct check as the implementation of\nlist_first_entry is not designed to return NULL for empty lists.\r\n\r\nInstead, use list_first_entry_or_null() which does return NULL if the\nlist is empty.\r\n\r\nFlagged by Smatch.\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2024-42224)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1961",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:26Z",
"published": "2024-08-09T11:07:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38561"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41073"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42160"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42162"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42224"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48827",
"CVE-2023-52887",
"CVE-2024-38561",
"CVE-2024-38594",
"CVE-2024-38627",
"CVE-2024-39497",
"CVE-2024-40910",
"CVE-2024-40959",
"CVE-2024-40961",
"CVE-2024-40967",
"CVE-2024-40976",
"CVE-2024-40999",
"CVE-2024-41013",
"CVE-2024-41014",
"CVE-2024-41020",
"CVE-2024-41022",
"CVE-2024-41023",
"CVE-2024-41027",
"CVE-2024-41044",
"CVE-2024-41055",
"CVE-2024-41062",
"CVE-2024-41064",
"CVE-2024-41066",
"CVE-2024-41070",
"CVE-2024-41072",
"CVE-2024-41073",
"CVE-2024-41077",
"CVE-2024-41079",
"CVE-2024-41081",
"CVE-2024-41087",
"CVE-2024-41089",
"CVE-2024-41097",
"CVE-2024-42068",
"CVE-2024-42076",
"CVE-2024-42077",
"CVE-2024-42080",
"CVE-2024-42082",
"CVE-2024-42084",
"CVE-2024-42089",
"CVE-2024-42090",
"CVE-2024-42092",
"CVE-2024-42093",
"CVE-2024-42094",
"CVE-2024-42101",
"CVE-2024-42106",
"CVE-2024-42124",
"CVE-2024-42137",
"CVE-2024-42145",
"CVE-2024-42155",
"CVE-2024-42160",
"CVE-2024-42161",
"CVE-2024-42162",
"CVE-2024-42224"
]
}
OESA-2024-1962 (CVE-2021-47382)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-08-09 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/qeth: fix deadlock during failing recovery
Commit 0b9902c1fcc5 ("s390/qeth: fix deadlock during recovery") removed taking discipline_mutex inside qeth_do_reset(), fixing potential deadlocks. An error path was missed though, that still takes discipline_mutex and thus has the original deadlock potential.
Intermittent deadlocks were seen when a qeth channel path is configured offline, causing a race between qeth_do_reset and ccwgroup_remove. Call qeth_set_offline() directly in the qeth_do_reset() error case and then a new variant of ccwgroup_set_offline(), without taking discipline_mutex.(CVE-2021-47382)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX
Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request.
The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ.
Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.
Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new
This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().
Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 & while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done(CVE-2023-52887)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvlan: Dont Use skb->sk in ipvlan_process_v{4,6}_outbound
Raw packet from PF_PACKET socket ontop of an IPv6-backed ipvlan device will hit WARN_ON_ONCE() in sk_mc_loop() through sch_direct_xmit() path.
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/sock.c:775 sk_mc_loop+0x2d/0x70 Modules linked in: sch_netem ipvlan rfkill cirrus drm_shmem_helper sg drm_kms_helper CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0+ #279 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:sk_mc_loop+0x2d/0x70 Code: fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 0f b7 15 f7 96 a3 4f 31 c0 66 85 d2 75 26 48 85 ff 74 1c RSP: 0018:ffffa9584015cd78 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: 0000000000000011 RBX: ffff91e585793e00 RCX: 0000000002c6a001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000040 RDI: ffff91e589c0f000 RBP: ffff91e5855bd100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 3d00545216f43d00 R10: ffff91e584fdcc50 R11: 00000060dd8616f4 R12: ffff91e58132d000 R13: ffff91e584fdcc68 R14: ffff91e5869ce800 R15: ffff91e589c0f000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91e898100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f788f7c44c0 CR3: 0000000008e1a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:693) ? sk_mc_loop (net/core/sock.c:760) ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219) ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:239) ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260 (discriminator 1)) ? asm_exc_invalid_op (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621) ? sk_mc_loop (net/core/sock.c:760) ip6_finish_output2 (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:83 (discriminator 1)) ? nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:626) ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:222) ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215) ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 (drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602) ipvlan ipvlan_start_xmit (drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:226) ipvlan dev_hard_start_xmit (net/core/dev.c:3594) sch_direct_xmit (net/sched/sch_generic.c:343) __qdisc_run (net/sched/sch_generic.c:416) net_tx_action (net/core/dev.c:5286) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:555) __irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:589) sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043)
The warning triggers as this: packet_sendmsg packet_snd //skb->sk is packet sk __dev_queue_xmit __dev_xmit_skb //q->enqueue is not NULL __qdisc_run sch_direct_xmit dev_hard_start_xmit ipvlan_start_xmit ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 //l3 mode ipvlan_process_outbound //vepa flag ipvlan_process_v6_outbound ip6_local_out __ip6_finish_output ip6_finish_output2 //multicast packet sk_mc_loop //sk->sk_family is AF_PACKET
Call ip{6}_local_out() with NULL sk in ipvlan as other tunnels to fix this.(CVE-2024-33621)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: ncm: Fix handling of zero block length packets
While connecting to a Linux host with CDC_NCM_NTB_DEF_SIZE_TX set to 65536, it has been observed that we receive short packets, which come at interval of 5-10 seconds sometimes and have block length zero but still contain 1-2 valid datagrams present.
According to the NCM spec:
"If wBlockLength = 0x0000, the block is terminated by a short packet. In this case, the USB transfer must still be shorter than dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize. If exactly dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize bytes are sent, and the size is a multiple of wMaxPacketSize for the given pipe, then no ZLP shall be sent.
wBlockLength= 0x0000 must be used with extreme care, because of the possibility that the host and device may get out of sync, and because of test issues.
wBlockLength = 0x0000 allows the sender to reduce latency by starting to send a very large NTB, and then shortening it when the sender discovers that there’s not sufficient data to justify sending a large NTB"
However, there is a potential issue with the current implementation, as it checks for the occurrence of multiple NTBs in a single giveback by verifying if the leftover bytes to be processed is zero or not. If the block length reads zero, we would process the same NTB infintely because the leftover bytes is never zero and it leads to a crash. Fix this by bailing out if block length reads zero.(CVE-2024-35825)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference
In vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kunit: Fix kthread reference
There is a race condition when a kthread finishes after the deadline and before the call to kthread_stop(), which may lead to use after free.(CVE-2024-38561)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv
Reinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex lock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger the following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct stmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing this initialization.
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29 Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 sp : ffffffc0864e3570 x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003 x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000 x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8 x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698 x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34 tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0 taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
stm class: Fix a double free in stm_register_device()
The put_device(&stm->dev) call will trigger stm_device_release() which frees "stm" so the vfree(stm) on the next line is a double free.(CVE-2024-38627)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/shmem-helper: Fix BUG_ON() on mmap(PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE)
Lack of check for copy-on-write (COW) mapping in drm_gem_shmem_mmap allows users to call mmap with PROT_WRITE and MAP_PRIVATE flag causing a kernel panic due to BUG_ON in vmf_insert_pfn_prot: BUG_ON((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) && is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags));
Return -EINVAL early if COW mapping is detected.
This bug affects all drm drivers using default shmem helpers. It can be reproduced by this simple example: void *ptr = mmap(0, size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, mmap_offset); ptr0 = 0;(CVE-2024-39497)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix kernel crash problem in concurrent scenario
When link status change, the nic driver need to notify the roce driver to handle this event, but at this time, the roce driver may uninit, then cause kernel crash.
To fix the problem, when link status change, need to check whether the roce registered, and when uninit, need to wait link update finish.(CVE-2024-39507)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections
When releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to decrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the execution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls netdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately to kernel crashes.
A typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the following errors:
refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
And will then have a trace like:
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? show_regs+0x64/0x70
? __warn+0x83/0x120
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? report_bug+0x158/0x190
? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30
? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360
__sock_release+0x35/0xa0
sock_close+0x19/0x20
[...]
On reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets stuck in an infinite loop:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0
This patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold() and ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the logic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both cases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in ax25_release().(CVE-2024-40910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: Fix a data race on last_boosted_vcpu in kvm_vcpu_on_spin()
Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to access kvm->last_boosted_vcpu to ensure the loads and stores are atomic. In the extremely unlikely scenario the compiler tears the stores, it's theoretically possible for KVM to attempt to get a vCPU using an out-of-bounds index, e.g. if the write is split into multiple 8-bit stores, and is paired with a 32-bit load on a VM with 257 vCPUs:
CPU0 CPU1 last_boosted_vcpu = 0xff;
(last_boosted_vcpu = 0x100)
last_boosted_vcpu[15:8] = 0x01;
i = (last_boosted_vcpu = 0x1ff) last_boosted_vcpu[7:0] = 0x00;
vcpu = kvm->vcpu_array[0x1ff];
As detected by KCSAN:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm] / kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm]
write to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4340 on cpu 16: kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4112) kvm handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:? arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890) x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
read to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4342 on cpu 4: kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4069) kvm handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:? arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890) x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
value changed: 0x00000012 -> 0x00000000(CVE-2024-40953)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()
ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.
syzbot reported:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Workqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64 Code: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98 RBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000 R10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541 xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835 xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline] xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201 xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline] xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256 send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139 wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178 wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200 wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51 process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent possible NULL deref in fib6_nh_init()
syzbot reminds us that in6_dev_get() can return NULL.
fib6_nh_init() ip6_validate_gw( &idev ) ip6_route_check_nh( idev ) *idev = in6_dev_get(dev); // can be NULL
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 11237 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00249-gbe27b8965297 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024 RIP: 0010:fib6_nh_init+0x640/0x2160 net/ipv6/route.c:3606 Code: 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 64 24 58 48 8b 44 24 28 4c 8b 74 24 30 48 89 c1 48 89 44 24 28 48 8d 98 e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 0f 85 b3 17 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff 89 de e8 b8 8b RSP: 0018:ffffc900032775a0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffc90003277a54 RDI: ffff88802b3a08d8 RBP: ffffc900032778b0 R08: 00000000000002fc R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000002fc R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88802b3a08b8 R13: 1ffff9200064eec8 R14: ffffc90003277a00 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f940feb06c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000245e8000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ip6_route_info_create+0x99e/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3809 ip6_route_add+0x28/0x160 net/ipv6/route.c:3853 ipv6_route_ioctl+0x588/0x870 net/ipv6/route.c:4483 inet6_ioctl+0x21a/0x280 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:579 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f940f07cea9(CVE-2024-40961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset
There is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long enough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still complete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler. This runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler. In some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount imbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:
[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669628] Call trace: [10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 [10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0 [10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120 [10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160 [10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0
We can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the beginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting for that job entirely. The irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already done as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/radeon: fix UBSAN warning in kv_dpm.c
Adds bounds check for sumo_vid_mapping_entry.(CVE-2024-40988)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency
Validate that first flag is set only for the first
descriptor in multi-buffer packets.
In case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.
A new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netrom: Fix a memory leak in nr_heartbeat_expiry()
syzbot reported a memory leak in nr_create() 0.
Commit 409db27e3a2e ("netrom: Fix use-after-free of a listening socket.") added sock_hold() to the nr_heartbeat_expiry() function, where a) a socket has a SOCK_DESTROY flag or b) a listening socket has a SOCK_DEAD flag.
But in the case "a," when the SOCK_DESTROY flag is set, the file descriptor has already been closed and the nr_release() function has been called. So it makes no sense to hold the reference count because no one will call another nr_destroy_socket() and put it as in the case "b."
nr_connect nr_establish_data_link nr_start_heartbeat
nr_release switch (nr->state) case NR_STATE_3 nr->state = NR_STATE_2 sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DESTROY);
nr_rx_frame
nr_process_rx_frame
switch (nr->state)
case NR_STATE_2
nr_state2_machine()
nr_disconnect()
nr_sk(sk)->state = NR_STATE_0
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)
nr_heartbeat_expiry
switch (nr->state)
case NR_STATE_0
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DESTROY) ||
(sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN
&& sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)))
sock_hold() // ( !!! )
nr_destroy_socket()
To fix the memory leak, let's call sock_hold() only for a listening socket.
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: don't walk off the end of a directory data block
This adds sanity checks for xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_entry to make sure don't stray beyond valid memory region. Before patching, the loop simply checks that the start offset of the dup and dep is within the range. So in a crafted image, if last entry is xfs_dir2_data_unused, we can change dup->length to dup->length-1 and leave 1 byte of space. In the next traversal, this space will be considered as dup or dep. We may encounter an out of bound read when accessing the fixed members.
In the patch, we make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold an unused entry before accessing xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_unused is XFS_DIR2_DATA_ALIGN byte aligned. We also make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold a dirent with a single-byte name before accessing xfs_dir2_data_entry.(CVE-2024-41013)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data
There is a lack of verification of the space occupied by fixed members of xlog_op_header in the xlog_recover_process_data.
We can create a crafted image to trigger an out of bounds read by following these steps: 1) Mount an image of xfs, and do some file operations to leave records 2) Before umounting, copy the image for subsequent steps to simulate abnormal exit. Because umount will ensure that tail_blk and head_blk are the same, which will result in the inability to enter xlog_recover_process_data 3) Write a tool to parse and modify the copied image in step 2 4) Make the end of the xlog_op_header entries only 1 byte away from xlog_rec_header->h_size 5) xlog_rec_header->h_num_logops++ 6) Modify xlog_rec_header->h_crc
Fix: Add a check to make sure there is sufficient space to access fixed members of xlog_op_header.(CVE-2024-41014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Validate ff offset
This adds sanity checks for ff offset. There is a check on rt->first_free at first, but walking through by ff without any check. If the second ff is a large offset. We may encounter an out-of-bound read.(CVE-2024-41019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path
When I wrote commit 3cad1bc01041 ("filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected"), I missed that there are two copies of the code I was patching: The normal version, and the version for 64-bit offsets on 32-bit kernels. Thanks to Greg KH for stumbling over this while doing the stable backport...
Apply exactly the same fix to the compat path for 32-bit kernels.(CVE-2024-41020)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix signedness bug in sdma_v4_0_process_trap_irq()
The "instance" variable needs to be signed for the error handling to work.(CVE-2024-41022)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference leak
During the execution of the following stress test with linux-rt:
stress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30 --minimize --quiet
kmemleak frequently reported a memory leak concerning the task_struct:
unreferenced object 0xffff8881305b8000 (size 16136): comm "stress-ng", pid 614, jiffies 4294883961 (age 286.412s) object hex dump (first 32 bytes): 02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .@.............. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ debug hex dump (first 16 bytes): 53 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 S............... backtrace: [<00000000046b6790>] dup_task_struct+0x30/0x540 [<00000000c5ca0f0b>] copy_process+0x3d9/0x50e0 [<00000000ced59777>] kernel_clone+0xb0/0x770 [<00000000a50befdc>] __do_sys_clone+0xb6/0xf0 [<000000001dbf2008>] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xf0 [<00000000552900ff>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
The issue occurs in start_dl_timer(), which increments the task_struct reference count and sets a timer. The timer callback, dl_task_timer, is supposed to decrement the reference count upon expiration. However, if enqueue_task_dl() is called before the timer expires and cancels it, the reference count is not decremented, leading to the leak.
This patch fixes the reference leak by ensuring the task_struct reference count is properly decremented when the timer is canceled.(CVE-2024-41023)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Fix userfaultfd_api to return EINVAL as expected
Currently if we request a feature that is not set in the Kernel config we fail silently and return all the available features. However, the man page indicates we should return an EINVAL.
We need to fix this issue since we can end up with a Kernel warning should a program request the feature UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED on a kernel with the config not set with this feature.
[ 200.812896] WARNING: CPU: 91 PID: 13634 at mm/memory.c:1660 zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660 [ 200.820738] Modules linked in: [ 200.869387] CPU: 91 PID: 13634 Comm: userfaultfd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #8 [ 200.877477] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6525/0N7YGH, BIOS 2.7.3 03/30/2022 [ 200.885052] RIP: 0010:zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660(CVE-2024-41027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: Fix UAF when resolving a clash
KASAN reports the following UAF:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn+0x12b/0x380 [act_ct] Read of size 1 at addr ffff888c07603600 by task handler130/6469
Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x33/0x3d0 print_report+0xc0/0x2b0 kasan_report+0xd0/0x120 __asan_load1+0x6c/0x80 tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn+0x12b/0x380 [act_ct] tcf_ct_act+0x886/0x1350 [act_ct] tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0 fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower] __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330 tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0 sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500 __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620 napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0 gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100 __napi_poll+0x65/0x310 net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0 __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491 __irq_exit_rcu+0x82/0xc0 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 common_interrupt+0xa1/0xb0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt+0x27/0x40
Allocated by task 6469: kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x70 kasan_set_track+0x25/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1e/0x40 __kasan_krealloc+0x133/0x190 krealloc+0xaa/0x130 nf_ct_ext_add+0xed/0x230 [nf_conntrack] tcf_ct_act+0x1095/0x1350 [act_ct] tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0 fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower] __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330 tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0 sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500 __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620 napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0 gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100 __napi_poll+0x65/0x310 net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0 __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491
Freed by task 6469: kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x70 kasan_set_track+0x25/0x40 kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x60 _kasanslab_free+0x180/0x1f0 kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x30 slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd2/0x1a0 __kmem_cache_free+0x1a2/0x2f0 kfree+0x78/0x120 nf_conntrack_free+0x74/0x130 [nf_conntrack] nf_ct_destroy+0xb2/0x140 [nf_conntrack] __nf_ct_resolve_clash+0x529/0x5d0 [nf_conntrack] nf_ct_resolve_clash+0xf6/0x490 [nf_conntrack] __nf_conntrack_confirm+0x2c6/0x770 [nf_conntrack] tcf_ct_act+0x12ad/0x1350 [act_ct] tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0 fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower] __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330 tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0 sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500 __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620 napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0 gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100 __napi_poll+0x65/0x310 net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0 __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491
The ct may be dropped if a clash has been resolved but is still passed to the tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn function for further usage. This issue can be fixed by retrieving ct from skb again after confirming conntrack.(CVE-2024-41040)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udp: Set SOCK_RCU_FREE earlier in udp_lib_get_port().
syzkaller triggered the warning 0 in udp_v4_early_demux().
In udp_v[46]_early_demux() and sk_lookup(), we do not touch the refcount of the looked-up sk and use sock_pfree() as skb->destructor, so we check SOCK_RCU_FREE to ensure that the sk is safe to access during the RCU grace period.
Currently, SOCK_RCU_FREE is flagged for a bound socket after being put into the hash table. Moreover, the SOCK_RCU_FREE check is done too early in udp_v[46]_early_demux() and sk_lookup(), so there could be a small race window:
CPU1 CPU2 ---- ---- udp_v4_early_demux() udp_lib_get_port() | |- hlist_add_head_rcu() |- sk = __udp4_lib_demux_lookup() | |- DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(sk_is_refcounted(sk)); `- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE)
We had the same bug in TCP and fixed it in commit 871019b22d1b ("net: set SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into hashtable").
Let's apply the same fix for UDP.
0: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11198 at net/ipv4/udp.c:2599 udp_v4_early_demux+0x481/0xb70 net/ipv4/udp.c:2599 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 11198 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.9.0-g93bda33046e7 #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:udp_v4_early_demux+0x481/0xb70 net/ipv4/udp.c:2599 Code: c5 7a 15 fe bb 01 00 00 00 44 89 e9 31 ff d3 e3 81 e3 bf ef ff ff 89 de e8 2c 74 15 fe 85 db 0f 85 02 06 00 00 e8 9f 7a 15 fe <0f> 0b e8 98 7a 15 fe 49 8d 7e 60 e8 4f 39 2f fe 49 c7 46 60 20 52 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000ce3fa58 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff8318c92c RDX: ffff888036ccde00 RSI: ffffffff8318c2f1 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff88805a2dd6e0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0001ffffffffffff R12: ffff88805a2dd680 R13: 0000000000000007 R14: ffff88800923f900 R15: ffff88805456004e FS: 00007fc449127640(0000) GS:ffff88807dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fc449126e38 CR3: 000000003de4b002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ip_rcv_finish_core.constprop.0+0xbdd/0xd20 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:349 ip_rcv_finish+0xda/0x150 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:447 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:308 [inline] ip_rcv+0x16c/0x180 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb3/0xe0 net/core/dev.c:5624 __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0xd0 net/core/dev.c:5738 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5824 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x271/0x300 net/core/dev.c:5884 tun_rx_batched drivers/net/tun.c:1549 [inline] tun_get_user+0x24db/0x2c50 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 tun_chr_write_iter+0x107/0x1a0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0x76f/0x8d0 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0xbf/0x190 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x41/0x50 fs/read_write.c:652 x64_sys_call+0xe66/0x1990 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:2 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fc44a68bc1f Code: 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 e9 cf f5 ff 48 8b 54 24 18 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 31 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 3c d0 f5 ff 48 RSP: 002b:00007fc449126c90 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004bc050 RCX: 00007fc44a68bc1f R ---truncated---(CVE-2024-41041)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets
Since 'ppp_async_encode()' assumes valid LCP packets (with code from 1 to 7 inclusive), add 'ppp_check_packet()' to ensure that LCP packet has an actual body beyond PPP_LCP header bytes, and reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed data otherwise.(CVE-2024-41044)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg
When running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch platform, the following kernel panic occurs:
[...] Oops[#1]: CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018 ... ... ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...) Stack : ... Call Trace: [<9000000004162774>] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 [<90000000048bf6c0>] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 [<90000000049f2b90>] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0 [<90000000049aae34>] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100 [<900000000481ad5c>] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0 [<900000000481e1a8>] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0 [<900000000481e27c>] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40 [<9000000004c076ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<9000000003731da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel relocated by 0x3510000 .text @ 0x9000000003710000 .data @ 0x9000000004d70000 .bss @ 0x9000000006469400 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- [...]
This crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown subtest in sockmap_basic.
This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the sk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the architecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch platform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform for a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause is that a zero length skb (skb->len == 0) was put on the queue.
This zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(), invoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown():
shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR);
In this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no page is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty sge is queued into ingress_msg list.
And in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by sg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it to kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics.
To solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(), if copy is zero, that means it's a zero length skb, skip invoking copy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by copy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.(CVE-2024-41048)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filelock: fix potential use-after-free in posix_lock_inode
Light Hsieh reported a KASAN UAF warning in trace_posix_lock_inode(). The request pointer had been changed earlier to point to a lock entry that was added to the inode's list. However, before the tracepoint could fire, another task raced in and freed that lock.
Fix this by moving the tracepoint inside the spinlock, which should ensure that this doesn't happen.(CVE-2024-41049)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: prevent derefencing NULL ptr in pfn_section_valid()
Commit 5ec8e8ea8b77 ("mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage") changed pfn_section_valid() to add a READ_ONCE() call around "ms->usage" to fix a race with section_deactivate() where ms->usage can be cleared. The READ_ONCE() call, by itself, is not enough to prevent NULL pointer dereference. We need to check its value before dereferencing it.(CVE-2024-41055)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release
The problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work, where the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
sock_close hci_rx_work
l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet
l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame
sk_free l2cap_conless_channel
l2cap_sock_recv_cb
If hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is closed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the released sock when receiving data.
Add a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between the sock release and recv cb.
Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.(CVE-2024-41062)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_core: cancel all works upon hci_unregister_dev()
syzbot is reporting that calling hci_release_dev() from hci_error_reset() due to hci_dev_put() from hci_error_reset() can cause deadlock at destroy_workqueue(), for hci_error_reset() is called from hdev->req_workqueue which destroy_workqueue() needs to flush.
We need to make sure that hdev->{rx_work,cmd_work,tx_work} which are queued into hdev->workqueue and hdev->{power_on,error_reset} which are queued into hdev->req_workqueue are no longer running by the moment
destroy_workqueue(hdev->workqueue);
destroy_workqueue(hdev->req_workqueue);
are called from hci_release_dev().
Call cancel_work_sync() on these work items from hci_unregister_dev() as soon as hdev->list is removed from hci_dev_list.(CVE-2024-41063)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/eeh: avoid possible crash when edev->pdev changes
If a PCI device is removed during eeh_pe_report_edev(), edev->pdev will change and can cause a crash, hold the PCI rescan/remove lock while taking a copy of edev->pdev->bus.(CVE-2024-41064)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ibmvnic: Add tx check to prevent skb leak
Below is a summary of how the driver stores a reference to an skb during transmit: tx_buff[free_map[consumer_index]]->skb = new_skb; free_map[consumer_index] = IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP; consumer_index ++; Where variable data looks like this: free_map == [4, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, 0, 3] consumer_index^ tx_buff == [skb=null, skb=<ptr>, skb=<ptr>, skb=null, skb=null]
The driver has checks to ensure that free_map[consumer_index] pointed to a valid index but there was no check to ensure that this index pointed to an unused/null skb address. So, if, by some chance, our free_map and tx_buff lists become out of sync then we were previously risking an skb memory leak. This could then cause tcp congestion control to stop sending packets, eventually leading to ETIMEDOUT.
Therefore, add a conditional to ensure that the skb address is null. If not then warn the user (because this is still a bug that should be patched) and free the old pointer to prevent memleak/tcp problems.(CVE-2024-41066)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: topology: Fix references to freed memory
Most users after parsing a topology file, release memory used by it, so having pointer references directly into topology file contents is wrong. Use devm_kmemdup(), to allocate memory as needed.(CVE-2024-41069)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Prevent UAF in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group()
Al reported a possible use-after-free (UAF) in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group().
It looks up stt from tablefd, but then continues to use it after doing
fdput() on the returned fd. After the fdput() the tablefd is free to be
closed by another thread. The close calls kvm_spapr_tce_release() and
then release_spapr_tce_table() (via call_rcu()) which frees stt.
Although there are calls to rcu_read_lock() in
kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group() they are not sufficient to prevent
the UAF, because stt is used outside the locked regions.
With an artifcial delay after the fdput() and a userspace program which triggers the race, KASAN detects the UAF:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm] Read of size 4 at addr c000200027552c30 by task kvm-vfio/2505 CPU: 54 PID: 2505 Comm: kvm-vfio Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240612-dirty #1 Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0x108 (unreliable) print_report+0x2b4/0x6ec kasan_report+0x118/0x2b0 __asan_load4+0xb8/0xd0 kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm] kvm_vfio_set_attr+0x524/0xac0 [kvm] kvm_device_ioctl+0x144/0x240 [kvm] sys_ioctl+0x62c/0x1810 system_call_exception+0x190/0x440 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec ... Freed by task 0: ... kfree+0xec/0x3e0 release_spapr_tce_table+0xd4/0x11c [kvm] rcu_core+0x568/0x16a0 handle_softirqs+0x23c/0x920 do_softirq_own_stack+0x6c/0x90 do_softirq_own_stack+0x58/0x90 __irq_exit_rcu+0x218/0x2d0 irq_exit+0x30/0x80 arch_local_irq_restore+0x128/0x230 arch_local_irq_enable+0x1c/0x30 cpuidle_enter_state+0x134/0x5cc cpuidle_enter+0x6c/0xb0 call_cpuidle+0x7c/0x100 do_idle+0x394/0x410 cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x70 start_secondary+0x3fc/0x410 start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
Fix it by delaying the fdput() until stt is no longer in use, which
is effectively the entire function. To keep the patch minimal add a call
to fdput() at each of the existing return paths. Future work can convert
the function to goto or __cleanup style cleanup.
With the fix in place the test case no longer triggers the UAF.(CVE-2024-41070)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: wext: add extra SIOCSIWSCAN data check
In 'cfg80211_wext_siwscan()', add extra check whether number of channels passed via 'ioctl(sock, SIOCSIWSCAN, ...)' doesn't exceed IW_MAX_FREQUENCIES and reject invalid request with -EINVAL otherwise.(CVE-2024-41072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme: avoid double free special payload
If a discard request needs to be retried, and that retry may fail before a new special payload is added, a double free will result. Clear the RQF_SPECIAL_LOAD when the request is cleaned.(CVE-2024-41073)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
null_blk: fix validation of block size
Block size should be between 512 and PAGE_SIZE and be a power of 2. The current check does not validate this, so update the check.
Without this patch, null_blk would Oops due to a null pointer deref when loaded with bs=1536 1.
axboe: remove unnecessary braces and != 0 check
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet: always initialize cqe.result
The spec doesn't mandate that the first two double words (aka results) for the command queue entry need to be set to 0 when they are not used (not specified). Though, the target implemention returns 0 for TCP and FC but not for RDMA.
Let's make RDMA behave the same and thus explicitly initializing the result field. This prevents leaking any data from the stack.(CVE-2024-41079)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: fix possible deadlock in io_register_iowq_max_workers()
The io_register_iowq_max_workers() function calls io_put_sq_data(), which acquires the sqd->lock without releasing the uring_lock. Similar to the commit 009ad9f0c6ee ("io_uring: drop ctx->uring_lock before acquiring sqd->lock"), this can lead to a potential deadlock situation.
To resolve this issue, the uring_lock is released before calling io_put_sq_data(), and then it is re-acquired after the function call.
This change ensures that the locks are acquired in the correct order, preventing the possibility of a deadlock.(CVE-2024-41080)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: block BH in ila_output()
As explained in commit 1378817486d6 ("tipc: block BH before using dst_cache"), net/core/dst_cache.c helpers need to be called with BH disabled.
ila_output() is called from lwtunnel_output() possibly from process context, and under rcu_read_lock().
We might be interrupted by a softirq, re-enter ila_output() and corrupt dst_cache data structures.
Fix the race by using local_bh_disable().(CVE-2024-41081)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ata: libata-core: Fix double free on error
If e.g. the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, we will jump to the err_out label, which will call devres_release_group(). devres_release_group() will trigger a call to ata_host_release(). ata_host_release() calls kfree(host), so executing the kfree(host) in ata_host_alloc() will lead to a double free:
kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:553! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 11 PID: 599 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #47 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 Code: 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 80 d6 ff ff 4d 89 f1 41 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 d9 48 89 da RSP: 0018:ffffc90000f377f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RCX: ffff888112b1f320 RDX: 000000000000400b RSI: ffffffffc02c9de5 RDI: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBP: ffffc90000f37830 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffc90000f37610 R11: 617461203a736b6e R12: ffffea00044ac780 R13: ffff888100046400 R14: ffffffffc02c9de5 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f2f1cabe980(0000) GS:ffff88813b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2f1c3acf75 CR3: 0000000111724000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0 ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]
Ensure that we will not call kfree(host) twice, by performing the kfree() only if the devres_open_group() call failed.(CVE-2024-41087)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_hd_modes
In nv17_tv_get_hd_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). The same applies to drm_cvt_mode(). Add a check to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-41089)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tap: add missing verification for short frame
The cited commit missed to check against the validity of the frame length in the tap_get_user_xdp() path, which could cause a corrupted skb to be sent downstack. Even before the skb is transmitted, the tap_get_user_xdp()-->skb_set_network_header() may assume the size is more than ETH_HLEN. Once transmitted, this could either cause out-of-bound access beyond the actual length, or confuse the underlayer with incorrect or inconsistent header length in the skb metadata.
In the alternative path, tap_get_user() already prohibits short frame which has the length less than Ethernet header size from being transmitted.
This is to drop any frame shorter than the Ethernet header size just like how tap_get_user() does.
CVE: CVE-2024-41090(CVE-2024-41090)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tun: add missing verification for short frame
The cited commit missed to check against the validity of the frame length in the tun_xdp_one() path, which could cause a corrupted skb to be sent downstack. Even before the skb is transmitted, the tun_xdp_one-->eth_type_trans() may access the Ethernet header although it can be less than ETH_HLEN. Once transmitted, this could either cause out-of-bound access beyond the actual length, or confuse the underlayer with incorrect or inconsistent header length in the skb metadata.
In the alternative path, tun_get_user() already prohibits short frame which has the length less than Ethernet header size from being transmitted for IFF_TAP.
This is to drop any frame shorter than the Ethernet header size just like how tun_get_user() does.
CVE: CVE-2024-41091(CVE-2024-41091)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: atm: cxacru: fix endpoint checking in cxacru_bind()
Syzbot is still reporting quite an old issue 1 that occurs due to incomplete checking of present usb endpoints. As such, wrong endpoints types may be used at urb sumbitting stage which in turn triggers a warning in usb_submit_urb().
Fix the issue by verifying that required endpoint types are present for both in and out endpoints, taking into account cmd endpoint type.
Unfortunately, this patch has not been tested on real hardware.
1 Syzbot report: usb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 1 != type 3 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event RIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 ... Call Trace: cxacru_cm+0x3c0/0x8e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:649 cxacru_card_status+0x22/0xd0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:760 cxacru_bind+0x7ac/0x11a0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1209 usbatm_usb_probe+0x321/0x1ae0 drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c:1055 cxacru_usb_probe+0xdf/0x1e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1363 usb_probe_interface+0x315/0x7f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396 call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 [inline] really_probe+0x23c/0xcd0 drivers/base/dd.c:595 __driver_probe_device+0x338/0x4d0 drivers/base/dd.c:747 driver_probe_device+0x4c/0x1a0 drivers/base/dd.c:777 __device_attach_driver+0x20b/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:894 bus_for_each_drv+0x15f/0x1e0 drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach+0x228/0x4a0 drivers/base/dd.c:965 bus_probe_device+0x1e4/0x290 drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add+0xc2f/0x2180 drivers/base/core.c:3354 usb_set_configuration+0x113a/0x1910 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170 usb_generic_driver_probe+0xba/0x100 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238 usb_probe_device+0xd9/0x2c0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293(CVE-2024-41097)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
set_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
Check its return and take it into account as an error.(CVE-2024-42068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: can: j1939: Initialize unused data in j1939_send_one()
syzbot reported kernel-infoleak in raw_recvmsg() 1. j1939_send_one() creates full frame including unused data, but it doesn't initialize it. This causes the kernel-infoleak issue. Fix this by initializing unused data.
1 BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] memcpy_to_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4113 [inline] raw_recvmsg+0x2b8/0x9e0 net/can/raw.c:1008 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 _sysrecvmsg+0x18a/0x620 net/socket.c:2803 _sys_recvmsg+0x223/0x840 net/socket.c:2845 do_recvmmsg+0x4fc/0xfd0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x397/0x490 net/socket.c:3034 x64_sys_call+0xf6c/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1842 [inline] j1939_sk_alloc_skb net/can/j1939/socket.c:878 [inline] j1939_sk_send_loop net/can/j1939/socket.c:1142 [inline] j1939_sk_sendmsg+0xc0a/0x2730 net/can/j1939/socket.c:1277 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 x64_sys_call+0xc4b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Bytes 12-15 of 16 are uninitialized Memory access of size 16 starts at ffff888120969690 Data copied to user address 00000000200017c0
CPU: 1 PID: 5050 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00031-g71b1543c83d6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024(CVE-2024-42076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits
The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can contain arbitrary number of extents.
Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not in all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if the IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to this error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.
To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().
Heming Zhao said:
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error"
PID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA" #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932 #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9 #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2] #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2] #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2] #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2] #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2] #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]
10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]
11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7
12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f
13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]
14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14
15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b
16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]
17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e
18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde
19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada
20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984
21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba(CVE-2024-42077)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access
struct rdma_restrack_entry's kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME in ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this rdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in rdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.
These code is used to help find one forgotten PD release in one of the ULPs. But it is not needed anymore, so delete them.(CVE-2024-42080)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()
syzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().
The warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It returns the error in two cases:
- memory allocation fails;
- rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params struct are not initialized properly.
The second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params struct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a problem with memory allocation.
Thus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be safely removed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
CPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
Call Trace: xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344 xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267 bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240 __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.(CVE-2024-42082)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftruncate: pass a signed offset
The old ftruncate() syscall, using the 32-bit off_t misses a sign extension when called in compat mode on 64-bit architectures. As a result, passing a negative length accidentally succeeds in truncating to file size between 2GiB and 4GiB.
Changing the type of the compat syscall to the signed compat_off_t changes the behavior so it instead returns -EINVAL.
The native entry point, the truncate() syscall and the corresponding loff_t based variants are all correct already and do not suffer from this mistake.(CVE-2024-42084)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: chemical: bme680: Fix overflows in compensate() functions
There are cases in the compensate functions of the driver that there could be overflows of variables due to bit shifting ops. These implications were initially discussed here 1 and they were mentioned in log message of Commit 1b3bd8592780 ("iio: chemical: Add support for Bosch BME680 sensor").
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: set priv->pdev before using it
priv->pdev pointer was set after being used in fsl_asoc_card_audmux_init(). Move this assignment at the start of the probe function, so sub-functions can correctly use pdev through priv.
fsl_asoc_card_audmux_init() dereferences priv->pdev to get access to the dev struct, used with dev_err macros. As priv is zero-initialised, there would be a NULL pointer dereference. Note that if priv->dev is dereferenced before assignment but never used, for example if there is no error to be printed, the driver won't crash probably due to compiler optimisations.(CVE-2024-42089)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: fix deadlock in create_pinctrl() when handling -EPROBE_DEFER
In create_pinctrl(), pinctrl_maps_mutex is acquired before calling add_setting(). If add_setting() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, create_pinctrl() calls pinctrl_free(). However, pinctrl_free() attempts to acquire pinctrl_maps_mutex, which is already held by create_pinctrl(), leading to a potential deadlock.
This patch resolves the issue by releasing pinctrl_maps_mutex before calling pinctrl_free(), preventing the deadlock.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-42090)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: davinci: Validate the obtained number of IRQs
Value of pdata->gpio_unbanked is taken from Device Tree. In case of broken DT due to any error this value can be any. Without this value validation there can be out of chips->irqs array boundaries access in davinci_gpio_probe().
Validate the obtained nirq value so that it won't exceed the maximum number of IRQs per bank.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42092)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/dpaa2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42093)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: emux: improve patch ioctl data validation
In load_data(), make the validation of and skipping over the main info block match that in load_guspatch().
In load_guspatch(), add checking that the specified patch length matches the actually supplied data, like load_data() already did.(CVE-2024-42097)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in nouveau_connector_get_modes
In nouveau_connector_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42101)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet_diag: Initialize pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in raw_lookup() 1. Diag for raw sockets uses the pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2 for the underlying protocol. This field corresponds to the sdiag_raw_protocol field in struct inet_diag_req_raw.
inet_diag_get_exact_compat() converts inet_diag_req to inet_diag_req_v2, but leaves the pad field uninitialized. So the issue occurs when raw_lookup() accesses the sdiag_raw_protocol field.
Fix this by initializing the pad field in inet_diag_get_exact_compat(). Also, do the same fix in inet_diag_dump_compat() to avoid the similar issue in the future.
1 BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 _sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was stored to memory at: raw_sock_get+0x650/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 _sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Local variable req.i created at: inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1396 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2a6/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282
CPU: 1 PID: 8888 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-42106)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jffs2: Fix potential illegal address access in jffs2_free_inode
During the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following abnormal printouts were found: [ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948 [ 2430.649622] Mem abort info: [ 2430.649829] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 2430.650115] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 2430.650564] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 2430.650795] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 2430.651032] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 2430.651446] Data abort info: [ 2430.651683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 2430.652001] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33 [ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10 [ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000 [ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19 [ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302 [ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342 [ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000 [ 2430.664217] Call trace: [ 2430.664528] kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.664855] jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.665233] i_callback+0x24/0x50 [ 2430.665528] rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448 [ 2430.665892] rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8 [ 2430.666151] rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28 [ 2430.666473] __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc [ 2430.666781] irq_exit+0xf0/0x110 [ 2430.667065] handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98 [ 2430.667447] gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8 [ 2430.667739] call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54 The parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of the jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info structure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these variables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing, which is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the function jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in the function jffs2_init_inode_info.
The function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked, but in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered, which releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode is not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked may enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code.
Since the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target, the fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once.(CVE-2024-42115)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedf: Make qedf_execute_tmf() non-preemptible
Stop calling smp_processor_id() from preemptible code in qedf_execute_tmf90. This results in BUG_ON() when running an RT kernel.
[ 659.343280] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sg_reset/3646 [ 659.343282] caller is qedf_execute_tmf+0x8b/0x360 qedf
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: mlxreg: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
In this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register() so they are automatically unregistered after module's remove() is done. led_classdev_unregister() calls module's led_set_brightness() to turn off the LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already in module's remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42129)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure again for QCA6390 after warm reboot
Commit 272970be3dab ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix driver shutdown on closed serdev") will cause below regression issue:
BT can't be enabled after below steps: cold boot -> enable BT -> disable BT -> warm reboot -> BT enable failure if property enable-gpios is not configured within DT|ACPI for QCA6390.
The commit is to fix a use-after-free issue within qca_serdev_shutdown() by adding condition to avoid the serdev is flushed or wrote after closed but also introduces this regression issue regarding above steps since the VSC is not sent to reset controller during warm reboot.
Fixed by sending the VSC to reset controller within qca_serdev_shutdown() once BT was ever enabled, and the use-after-free issue is also fixed by this change since the serdev is still opened before it is flushed or wrote.
Verified by the reported machine Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop over below two kernel commits: commit e00fc2700a3f ("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump implementation for QCA") of bluetooth-next tree. commit b23d98d46d28 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump implementation for QCA") of linus mainline tree.(CVE-2024-42137)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List
The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth. As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading to potential list overflow.
To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed out by the time they are handled by user-space.
Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.(CVE-2024-42145)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe copies of protected- and secure-keys
Although the clear-key of neither protected- nor secure-keys is accessible, this key material should only be visible to the calling process. So wipe all copies of protected- or secure-keys from stack, even in case of an error.(CVE-2024-42155)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()
- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(), let's fix to add check condition in f2fs_build_fault_attr().
- Use f2fs_build_fault_attr() in __sbi_store() to clean up code.(CVE-2024-42160)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Avoid uninitialized value in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD
[Changes from V1: - Use a default branch in the switch statement to initialize `val'.]
GCC warns that `val' may be used uninitialized in the BPF_CRE_READ_BITFIELD macro, defined in bpf_core_read.h as:
[...]
unsigned long long val; \
[...] \
switch (__CORE_RELO(s, field, BYTE_SIZE)) { \
case 1: val = *(const unsigned char *)p; break; \
case 2: val = *(const unsigned short *)p; break; \
case 4: val = *(const unsigned int *)p; break; \
case 8: val = *(const unsigned long long *)p; break; \
} \
[...]
val; \
} \
This patch adds a default entry in the switch statement that sets `val' to zero in order to avoid the warning, and random values to be used in case __builtin_preserve_field_info returns unexpected values for BPF_FIELD_BYTE_SIZE.
Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions.(CVE-2024-42161)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gve: Account for stopped queues when reading NIC stats
We now account for the fact that the NIC might send us stats for a subset of queues. Without this change, gve_get_ethtool_stats might make an invalid access on the priv->stats_report->stats array.(CVE-2024-42162)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Correct check for empty list
Since commit a3c53be55c95 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO busses") mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus() has checked that the return value of list_first_entry() is non-NULL.
This appears to be intended to guard against the list chip->mdios being empty. However, it is not the correct check as the implementation of list_first_entry is not designed to return NULL for empty lists.
Instead, use list_first_entry_or_null() which does return NULL if the list is empty.
Flagged by Smatch. Compile tested only.(CVE-2024-42224)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Using uninitialized value *size when calling amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc
Initialize the size before calling amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc, such as case 0x03000001. V2: To really improve the handling we would actually need to have a separate value of 0xffffffff.(Christian)(CVE-2024-42228)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-222.0.0.125.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/qeth: fix deadlock during failing recovery\r\n\r\nCommit 0b9902c1fcc5 (\u0026quot;s390/qeth: fix deadlock during recovery\u0026quot;) removed\ntaking discipline_mutex inside qeth_do_reset(), fixing potential\ndeadlocks. An error path was missed though, that still takes\ndiscipline_mutex and thus has the original deadlock potential.\r\n\r\nIntermittent deadlocks were seen when a qeth channel path is configured\noffline, causing a race between qeth_do_reset and ccwgroup_remove.\nCall qeth_set_offline() directly in the qeth_do_reset() error case and\nthen a new variant of ccwgroup_set_offline(), without taking\ndiscipline_mutex.(CVE-2021-47382)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\r\n\r\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u0026gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\u0026quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u0026gt; the RPC read layers\u0026quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u0026gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u0026gt;\n\u0026gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u0026gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u0026gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u0026gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.\r\n\r\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\r\n\r\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\r\n\r\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new\r\n\r\nThis patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to\nSend) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE\nbacktraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error\nmessages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions.\nPreviously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts().\r\n\r\nPotentially this could be reproduced with something like:\ntestj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 \u0026amp;\nwhile true; do\n\t# send first RTS\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301;\n\t# send second RTS\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301;\n\t# send abort\n\tcansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301;\ndone(CVE-2023-52887)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvlan: Dont Use skb-\u0026gt;sk in ipvlan_process_v{4,6}_outbound\r\n\r\nRaw packet from PF_PACKET socket ontop of an IPv6-backed ipvlan device will\nhit WARN_ON_ONCE() in sk_mc_loop() through sch_direct_xmit() path.\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/sock.c:775 sk_mc_loop+0x2d/0x70\nModules linked in: sch_netem ipvlan rfkill cirrus drm_shmem_helper sg drm_kms_helper\nCPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0+ #279\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:sk_mc_loop+0x2d/0x70\nCode: fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 0f b7 15 f7 96 a3 4f 31 c0 66 85 d2 75 26 48 85 ff 74 1c\nRSP: 0018:ffffa9584015cd78 EFLAGS: 00010212\nRAX: 0000000000000011 RBX: ffff91e585793e00 RCX: 0000000002c6a001\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000040 RDI: ffff91e589c0f000\nRBP: ffff91e5855bd100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 3d00545216f43d00\nR10: ffff91e584fdcc50 R11: 00000060dd8616f4 R12: ffff91e58132d000\nR13: ffff91e584fdcc68 R14: ffff91e5869ce800 R15: ffff91e589c0f000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91e898100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f788f7c44c0 CR3: 0000000008e1a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:693)\n ? sk_mc_loop (net/core/sock.c:760)\n ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219)\n ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:239)\n ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260 (discriminator 1))\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621)\n ? sk_mc_loop (net/core/sock.c:760)\n ip6_finish_output2 (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:83 (discriminator 1))\n ? nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:626)\n ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:222)\n ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output (net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215)\n ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 (drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602) ipvlan\n ipvlan_start_xmit (drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:226) ipvlan\n dev_hard_start_xmit (net/core/dev.c:3594)\n sch_direct_xmit (net/sched/sch_generic.c:343)\n __qdisc_run (net/sched/sch_generic.c:416)\n net_tx_action (net/core/dev.c:5286)\n handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:555)\n __irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:589)\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043)\r\n\r\nThe warning triggers as this:\npacket_sendmsg\n packet_snd //skb-\u0026gt;sk is packet sk\n __dev_queue_xmit\n __dev_xmit_skb //q-\u0026gt;enqueue is not NULL\n __qdisc_run\n sch_direct_xmit\n dev_hard_start_xmit\n ipvlan_start_xmit\n ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 //l3 mode\n ipvlan_process_outbound //vepa flag\n ipvlan_process_v6_outbound\n ip6_local_out\n __ip6_finish_output\n ip6_finish_output2 //multicast packet\n sk_mc_loop //sk-\u0026gt;sk_family is AF_PACKET\r\n\r\nCall ip{6}_local_out() with NULL sk in ipvlan as other tunnels to fix this.(CVE-2024-33621)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: ncm: Fix handling of zero block length packets\r\n\r\nWhile connecting to a Linux host with CDC_NCM_NTB_DEF_SIZE_TX\nset to 65536, it has been observed that we receive short packets,\nwhich come at interval of 5-10 seconds sometimes and have block\nlength zero but still contain 1-2 valid datagrams present.\r\n\r\nAccording to the NCM spec:\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;If wBlockLength = 0x0000, the block is terminated by a\nshort packet. In this case, the USB transfer must still\nbe shorter than dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize. If\nexactly dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize bytes are sent,\nand the size is a multiple of wMaxPacketSize for the\ngiven pipe, then no ZLP shall be sent.\r\n\r\nwBlockLength= 0x0000 must be used with extreme care, because\nof the possibility that the host and device may get out of\nsync, and because of test issues.\r\n\r\nwBlockLength = 0x0000 allows the sender to reduce latency by\nstarting to send a very large NTB, and then shortening it when\nthe sender discovers that there\u2019s not sufficient data to justify\nsending a large NTB\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nHowever, there is a potential issue with the current implementation,\nas it checks for the occurrence of multiple NTBs in a single\ngiveback by verifying if the leftover bytes to be processed is zero\nor not. If the block length reads zero, we would process the same\nNTB infintely because the leftover bytes is never zero and it leads\nto a crash. Fix this by bailing out if block length reads zero.(CVE-2024-35825)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return\nNULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkunit: Fix kthread reference\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition when a kthread finishes after the deadline and\nbefore the call to kthread_stop(), which may lead to use after free.(CVE-2024-38561)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv\r\n\r\nReinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex\nlock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger\nthe following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct\nstmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing\nthis initialization.\r\n\r\nDEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u0026gt;magic != lock)\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29\n Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT)\n pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n sp : ffffffc0864e3570\n x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003\n x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac\n x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000\n x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8\n x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698\n x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001\n x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027\n x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Call trace:\n __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34\n tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c\n stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0\n taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nstm class: Fix a double free in stm_register_device()\r\n\r\nThe put_device(\u0026amp;stm-\u0026gt;dev) call will trigger stm_device_release() which\nfrees \u0026quot;stm\u0026quot; so the vfree(stm) on the next line is a double free.(CVE-2024-38627)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/shmem-helper: Fix BUG_ON() on mmap(PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE)\r\n\r\nLack of check for copy-on-write (COW) mapping in drm_gem_shmem_mmap\nallows users to call mmap with PROT_WRITE and MAP_PRIVATE flag\ncausing a kernel panic due to BUG_ON in vmf_insert_pfn_prot:\nBUG_ON((vma-\u0026gt;vm_flags \u0026amp; VM_PFNMAP) \u0026amp;\u0026amp; is_cow_mapping(vma-\u0026gt;vm_flags));\r\n\r\nReturn -EINVAL early if COW mapping is detected.\r\n\r\nThis bug affects all drm drivers using default shmem helpers.\nIt can be reproduced by this simple example:\nvoid *ptr = mmap(0, size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, mmap_offset);\nptr[0] = 0;(CVE-2024-39497)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: hns3: fix kernel crash problem in concurrent scenario\r\n\r\nWhen link status change, the nic driver need to notify the roce\ndriver to handle this event, but at this time, the roce driver\nmay uninit, then cause kernel crash.\r\n\r\nTo fix the problem, when link status change, need to check\nwhether the roce registered, and when uninit, need to wait link\nupdate finish.(CVE-2024-39507)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections\r\n\r\nWhen releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to\ndecrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the\nexecution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls\nnetdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately\nto kernel crashes.\r\n\r\nA typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the\nfollowing errors:\r\n\r\n refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\r\n\r\nAnd will then have a trace like:\r\n\r\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0x64/0x70\n ? __warn+0x83/0x120\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? report_bug+0x158/0x190\n ? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30\n ? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360\n __sock_release+0x35/0xa0\n sock_close+0x19/0x20\n [...]\r\n\r\nOn reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets\nstuck in an infinite loop:\r\n\r\n unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0\r\n\r\nThis patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold()\nand ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the\nlogic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both\ncases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in\nax25_release().(CVE-2024-40910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: Fix a data race on last_boosted_vcpu in kvm_vcpu_on_spin()\r\n\r\nUse {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to access kvm-\u0026gt;last_boosted_vcpu to ensure the\nloads and stores are atomic. In the extremely unlikely scenario the\ncompiler tears the stores, it\u0026apos;s theoretically possible for KVM to attempt\nto get a vCPU using an out-of-bounds index, e.g. if the write is split\ninto multiple 8-bit stores, and is paired with a 32-bit load on a VM with\n257 vCPUs:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n last_boosted_vcpu = 0xff;\r\n\r\n (last_boosted_vcpu = 0x100)\n last_boosted_vcpu[15:8] = 0x01;\n i = (last_boosted_vcpu = 0x1ff)\n last_boosted_vcpu[7:0] = 0x00;\r\n\r\n vcpu = kvm-\u0026gt;vcpu_array[0x1ff];\r\n\r\nAs detected by KCSAN:\r\n\r\n BUG: KCSAN: data-race in kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm] / kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm]\r\n\r\n write to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4340 on cpu 16:\n kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4112) kvm\n handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel\n vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:?\n\t\t arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel\n vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm\n __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890)\n __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)\n x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n read to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4342 on cpu 4:\n kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4069) kvm\n handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel\n vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:?\n\t\t\tarch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel\n vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm\n __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890)\n __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)\n x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n value changed: 0x00000012 -\u0026gt; 0x00000000(CVE-2024-40953)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()\r\n\r\nip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nWorkqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker\n RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64\nCode: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98\nRBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000\nR10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541\n xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835\n xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201\n xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256\n send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139\n wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178\n wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200\n wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40\n wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51\n process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393\n kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent possible NULL deref in fib6_nh_init()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reminds us that in6_dev_get() can return NULL.\r\n\r\nfib6_nh_init()\n ip6_validate_gw( \u0026amp;idev )\n ip6_route_check_nh( idev )\n *idev = in6_dev_get(dev); // can be NULL\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 11237 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00249-gbe27b8965297 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024\n RIP: 0010:fib6_nh_init+0x640/0x2160 net/ipv6/route.c:3606\nCode: 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 64 24 58 48 8b 44 24 28 4c 8b 74 24 30 48 89 c1 48 89 44 24 28 48 8d 98 e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 0f 85 b3 17 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff 89 de e8 b8 8b\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900032775a0 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffc90003277a54 RDI: ffff88802b3a08d8\nRBP: ffffc900032778b0 R08: 00000000000002fc R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 00000000000002fc R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88802b3a08b8\nR13: 1ffff9200064eec8 R14: ffffc90003277a00 R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f940feb06c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000245e8000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ip6_route_info_create+0x99e/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3809\n ip6_route_add+0x28/0x160 net/ipv6/route.c:3853\n ipv6_route_ioctl+0x588/0x870 net/ipv6/route.c:4483\n inet6_ioctl+0x21a/0x280 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:579\n sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222\n sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f940f07cea9(CVE-2024-40961)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long\nenough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still\ncomplete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler.\nThis runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler.\nIn some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount\nimbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:\r\n\r\n[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669628] Call trace:\n[10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n[10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0\n[10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120\n[10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160\n[10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0\r\n\r\nWe can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the\nbeginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting\nfor that job entirely.\nThe irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already\ndone as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/radeon: fix UBSAN warning in kv_dpm.c\r\n\r\nAdds bounds check for sumo_vid_mapping_entry.(CVE-2024-40988)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency\r\n\r\nValidate that `first` flag is set only for the first\ndescriptor in multi-buffer packets.\nIn case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.\nA new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetrom: Fix a memory leak in nr_heartbeat_expiry()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported a memory leak in nr_create() [0].\r\n\r\nCommit 409db27e3a2e (\u0026quot;netrom: Fix use-after-free of a listening socket.\u0026quot;)\nadded sock_hold() to the nr_heartbeat_expiry() function, where\na) a socket has a SOCK_DESTROY flag or\nb) a listening socket has a SOCK_DEAD flag.\r\n\r\nBut in the case \u0026quot;a,\u0026quot; when the SOCK_DESTROY flag is set, the file descriptor\nhas already been closed and the nr_release() function has been called.\nSo it makes no sense to hold the reference count because no one will\ncall another nr_destroy_socket() and put it as in the case \u0026quot;b.\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nnr_connect\n nr_establish_data_link\n nr_start_heartbeat\r\n\r\nnr_release\n switch (nr-\u0026gt;state)\n case NR_STATE_3\n nr-\u0026gt;state = NR_STATE_2\n sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DESTROY);\r\n\r\n nr_rx_frame\n nr_process_rx_frame\n switch (nr-\u0026gt;state)\n case NR_STATE_2\n nr_state2_machine()\n nr_disconnect()\n nr_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;state = NR_STATE_0\n sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)\r\n\r\n nr_heartbeat_expiry\n switch (nr-\u0026gt;state)\n case NR_STATE_0\n if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DESTROY) ||\n (sk-\u0026gt;sk_state == TCP_LISTEN\n \u0026amp;\u0026amp; sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)))\n sock_hold() // ( !!! )\n nr_destroy_socket()\r\n\r\nTo fix the memory leak, let\u0026apos;s call sock_hold() only for a listening socket.\r\n\r\nFound by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center\n(linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.\r\n\r\n[0]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d327a1f3b12e1e206c16(CVE-2024-41006)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfs: don\u0026apos;t walk off the end of a directory data block\r\n\r\nThis adds sanity checks for xfs_dir2_data_unused and xfs_dir2_data_entry\nto make sure don\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory region. Before patching, the\nloop simply checks that the start offset of the dup and dep is within the\nrange. So in a crafted image, if last entry is xfs_dir2_data_unused, we\ncan change dup-\u0026gt;length to dup-\u0026gt;length-1 and leave 1 byte of space. In the\nnext traversal, this space will be considered as dup or dep. We may\nencounter an out of bound read when accessing the fixed members.\r\n\r\nIn the patch, we make sure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold\nan unused entry before accessing xfs_dir2_data_unused and\nxfs_dir2_data_unused is XFS_DIR2_DATA_ALIGN byte aligned. We also make\nsure that the remaining bytes large enough to hold a dirent with a\nsingle-byte name before accessing xfs_dir2_data_entry.(CVE-2024-41013)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data\r\n\r\nThere is a lack of verification of the space occupied by fixed members\nof xlog_op_header in the xlog_recover_process_data.\r\n\r\nWe can create a crafted image to trigger an out of bounds read by\nfollowing these steps:\n 1) Mount an image of xfs, and do some file operations to leave records\n 2) Before umounting, copy the image for subsequent steps to simulate\n abnormal exit. Because umount will ensure that tail_blk and\n head_blk are the same, which will result in the inability to enter\n xlog_recover_process_data\n 3) Write a tool to parse and modify the copied image in step 2\n 4) Make the end of the xlog_op_header entries only 1 byte away from\n xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_size\n 5) xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_num_logops++\n 6) Modify xlog_rec_header-\u0026gt;h_crc\r\n\r\nFix:\nAdd a check to make sure there is sufficient space to access fixed members\nof xlog_op_header.(CVE-2024-41014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Validate ff offset\r\n\r\nThis adds sanity checks for ff offset. There is a check\non rt-\u0026gt;first_free at first, but walking through by ff\nwithout any check. If the second ff is a large offset.\nWe may encounter an out-of-bound read.(CVE-2024-41019)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfilelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path\r\n\r\nWhen I wrote commit 3cad1bc01041 (\u0026quot;filelock: Remove locks reliably when\nfcntl/close race is detected\u0026quot;), I missed that there are two copies of the\ncode I was patching: The normal version, and the version for 64-bit offsets\non 32-bit kernels.\nThanks to Greg KH for stumbling over this while doing the stable\nbackport...\r\n\r\nApply exactly the same fix to the compat path for 32-bit kernels.(CVE-2024-41020)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix signedness bug in sdma_v4_0_process_trap_irq()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;instance\u0026quot; variable needs to be signed for the error handling to work.(CVE-2024-41022)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference leak\r\n\r\nDuring the execution of the following stress test with linux-rt:\r\n\r\nstress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30 --minimize --quiet\r\n\r\nkmemleak frequently reported a memory leak concerning the task_struct:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff8881305b8000 (size 16136):\n comm \u0026quot;stress-ng\u0026quot;, pid 614, jiffies 4294883961 (age 286.412s)\n object hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .@..............\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n debug hex dump (first 16 bytes):\n 53 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 S...............\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;00000000046b6790\u0026gt;] dup_task_struct+0x30/0x540\n [\u0026lt;00000000c5ca0f0b\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x3d9/0x50e0\n [\u0026lt;00000000ced59777\u0026gt;] kernel_clone+0xb0/0x770\n [\u0026lt;00000000a50befdc\u0026gt;] __do_sys_clone+0xb6/0xf0\n [\u0026lt;000000001dbf2008\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xf0\n [\u0026lt;00000000552900ff\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\r\n\r\nThe issue occurs in start_dl_timer(), which increments the task_struct\nreference count and sets a timer. The timer callback, dl_task_timer,\nis supposed to decrement the reference count upon expiration. However,\nif enqueue_task_dl() is called before the timer expires and cancels it,\nthe reference count is not decremented, leading to the leak.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes the reference leak by ensuring the task_struct\nreference count is properly decremented when the timer is canceled.(CVE-2024-41023)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nFix userfaultfd_api to return EINVAL as expected\r\n\r\nCurrently if we request a feature that is not set in the Kernel config we\nfail silently and return all the available features. However, the man\npage indicates we should return an EINVAL.\r\n\r\nWe need to fix this issue since we can end up with a Kernel warning should\na program request the feature UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED on a kernel with\nthe config not set with this feature.\r\n\r\n [ 200.812896] WARNING: CPU: 91 PID: 13634 at mm/memory.c:1660 zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660\n [ 200.820738] Modules linked in:\n [ 200.869387] CPU: 91 PID: 13634 Comm: userfaultfd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #8\n [ 200.877477] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6525/0N7YGH, BIOS 2.7.3 03/30/2022\n [ 200.885052] RIP: 0010:zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660(CVE-2024-41027)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: Fix UAF when resolving a clash\r\n\r\nKASAN reports the following UAF:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn+0x12b/0x380 [act_ct]\n Read of size 1 at addr ffff888c07603600 by task handler130/6469\r\n\r\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x33/0x3d0\n print_report+0xc0/0x2b0\n kasan_report+0xd0/0x120\n __asan_load1+0x6c/0x80\n tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn+0x12b/0x380 [act_ct]\n tcf_ct_act+0x886/0x1350 [act_ct]\n tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0\n fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower]\n __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330\n tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0\n sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500\n __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510\n __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0\n netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620\n napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0\n gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100\n __napi_poll+0x65/0x310\n net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0\n __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x82/0xc0\n irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20\n common_interrupt+0xa1/0xb0\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_common_interrupt+0x27/0x40\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 6469:\n kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x70\n kasan_set_track+0x25/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1e/0x40\n __kasan_krealloc+0x133/0x190\n krealloc+0xaa/0x130\n nf_ct_ext_add+0xed/0x230 [nf_conntrack]\n tcf_ct_act+0x1095/0x1350 [act_ct]\n tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0\n fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower]\n __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330\n tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0\n sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500\n __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510\n __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0\n netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620\n napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0\n gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100\n __napi_poll+0x65/0x310\n net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0\n __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491\r\n\r\n Freed by task 6469:\n kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x70\n kasan_set_track+0x25/0x40\n kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x60\n ____kasan_slab_free+0x180/0x1f0\n __kasan_slab_free+0x12/0x30\n slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd2/0x1a0\n __kmem_cache_free+0x1a2/0x2f0\n kfree+0x78/0x120\n nf_conntrack_free+0x74/0x130 [nf_conntrack]\n nf_ct_destroy+0xb2/0x140 [nf_conntrack]\n __nf_ct_resolve_clash+0x529/0x5d0 [nf_conntrack]\n nf_ct_resolve_clash+0xf6/0x490 [nf_conntrack]\n __nf_conntrack_confirm+0x2c6/0x770 [nf_conntrack]\n tcf_ct_act+0x12ad/0x1350 [act_ct]\n tcf_action_exec+0xf8/0x1f0\n fl_classify+0x355/0x360 [cls_flower]\n __tcf_classify+0x1fd/0x330\n tcf_classify+0x21c/0x3c0\n sch_handle_ingress.constprop.0+0x2c5/0x500\n __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xb25/0x1510\n __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x220/0x4c0\n netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x446/0x620\n napi_complete_done+0x157/0x3d0\n gro_cell_poll+0xcf/0x100\n __napi_poll+0x65/0x310\n net_rx_action+0x30c/0x5c0\n __do_softirq+0x14f/0x491\r\n\r\nThe ct may be dropped if a clash has been resolved but is still passed to\nthe tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn function for further usage. This issue\ncan be fixed by retrieving ct from skb again after confirming conntrack.(CVE-2024-41040)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudp: Set SOCK_RCU_FREE earlier in udp_lib_get_port().\r\n\r\nsyzkaller triggered the warning [0] in udp_v4_early_demux().\r\n\r\nIn udp_v[46]_early_demux() and sk_lookup(), we do not touch the refcount\nof the looked-up sk and use sock_pfree() as skb-\u0026gt;destructor, so we check\nSOCK_RCU_FREE to ensure that the sk is safe to access during the RCU grace\nperiod.\r\n\r\nCurrently, SOCK_RCU_FREE is flagged for a bound socket after being put\ninto the hash table. Moreover, the SOCK_RCU_FREE check is done too early\nin udp_v[46]_early_demux() and sk_lookup(), so there could be a small race\nwindow:\r\n\r\n CPU1 CPU2\n ---- ----\n udp_v4_early_demux() udp_lib_get_port()\n | |- hlist_add_head_rcu()\n |- sk = __udp4_lib_demux_lookup() |\n |- DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(sk_is_refcounted(sk));\n `- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE)\r\n\r\nWe had the same bug in TCP and fixed it in commit 871019b22d1b (\u0026quot;net:\nset SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into hashtable\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s apply the same fix for UDP.\r\n\r\n[0]:\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11198 at net/ipv4/udp.c:2599 udp_v4_early_demux+0x481/0xb70 net/ipv4/udp.c:2599\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 11198 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.9.0-g93bda33046e7 #13\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:udp_v4_early_demux+0x481/0xb70 net/ipv4/udp.c:2599\nCode: c5 7a 15 fe bb 01 00 00 00 44 89 e9 31 ff d3 e3 81 e3 bf ef ff ff 89 de e8 2c 74 15 fe 85 db 0f 85 02 06 00 00 e8 9f 7a 15 fe \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e8 98 7a 15 fe 49 8d 7e 60 e8 4f 39 2f fe 49 c7 46 60 20 52\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000ce3fa58 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff8318c92c\nRDX: ffff888036ccde00 RSI: ffffffff8318c2f1 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: ffff88805a2dd6e0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0001ffffffffffff R12: ffff88805a2dd680\nR13: 0000000000000007 R14: ffff88800923f900 R15: ffff88805456004e\nFS: 00007fc449127640(0000) GS:ffff88807dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007fc449126e38 CR3: 000000003de4b002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ip_rcv_finish_core.constprop.0+0xbdd/0xd20 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:349\n ip_rcv_finish+0xda/0x150 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:447\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:308 [inline]\n ip_rcv+0x16c/0x180 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb3/0xe0 net/core/dev.c:5624\n __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0xd0 net/core/dev.c:5738\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5824 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x271/0x300 net/core/dev.c:5884\n tun_rx_batched drivers/net/tun.c:1549 [inline]\n tun_get_user+0x24db/0x2c50 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\n tun_chr_write_iter+0x107/0x1a0 drivers/net/tun.c:2048\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0x76f/0x8d0 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0xbf/0x190 fs/read_write.c:643\n __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline]\n __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline]\n __x64_sys_write+0x41/0x50 fs/read_write.c:652\n x64_sys_call+0xe66/0x1990 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:2\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\nRIP: 0033:0x7fc44a68bc1f\nCode: 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 e9 cf f5 ff 48 8b 54 24 18 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 31 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 3c d0 f5 ff 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fc449126c90 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004bc050 RCX: 00007fc44a68bc1f\nR\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-41041)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets\r\n\r\nSince \u0026apos;ppp_async_encode()\u0026apos; assumes valid LCP packets (with code\nfrom 1 to 7 inclusive), add \u0026apos;ppp_check_packet()\u0026apos; to ensure that\nLCP packet has an actual body beyond PPP_LCP header bytes, and\nreject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed data otherwise.(CVE-2024-41044)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nskmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg\r\n\r\nWhen running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch\nplatform, the following kernel panic occurs:\r\n\r\n [...]\n Oops[#1]:\n CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18\n Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018\n ... ...\n ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560\n ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0\n CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)\n PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE)\n EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE)\n ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7)\n ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)\n BADV: 0000000000000040\n PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000)\n Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack\n Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...)\n Stack : ...\n Call Trace:\n [\u0026lt;9000000004162774\u0026gt;] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;90000000048bf6c0\u0026gt;] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560\n [\u0026lt;90000000049f2b90\u0026gt;] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0\n [\u0026lt;90000000049aae34\u0026gt;] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100\n [\u0026lt;900000000481ad5c\u0026gt;] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0\n [\u0026lt;900000000481e1a8\u0026gt;] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;900000000481e27c\u0026gt;] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40\n [\u0026lt;9000000004c076ec\u0026gt;] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0\n [\u0026lt;9000000003731da4\u0026gt;] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160\n Code: ...\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception\n Kernel relocated by 0x3510000\n .text @ 0x9000000003710000\n .data @ 0x9000000004d70000\n .bss @ 0x9000000006469400\n ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---\n [...]\r\n\r\nThis crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown\nsubtest in sockmap_basic.\r\n\r\nThis crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the\nsk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the\narchitecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch\nplatform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform\nfor a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause\nis that a zero length skb (skb-\u0026gt;len == 0) was put on the queue.\r\n\r\nThis zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(),\ninvoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown():\r\n\r\n\tshutdown(p1, SHUT_WR);\r\n\r\nIn this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no\npage is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty\nsge is queued into ingress_msg list.\r\n\r\nAnd in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by\nsg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it\nto kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics.\r\n\r\nTo solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(),\nif copy is zero, that means it\u0026apos;s a zero length skb, skip invoking\ncopy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by\ncopy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.(CVE-2024-41048)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfilelock: fix potential use-after-free in posix_lock_inode\r\n\r\nLight Hsieh reported a KASAN UAF warning in trace_posix_lock_inode().\nThe request pointer had been changed earlier to point to a lock entry\nthat was added to the inode\u0026apos;s list. However, before the tracepoint could\nfire, another task raced in and freed that lock.\r\n\r\nFix this by moving the tracepoint inside the spinlock, which should\nensure that this doesn\u0026apos;t happen.(CVE-2024-41049)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm: prevent derefencing NULL ptr in pfn_section_valid()\r\n\r\nCommit 5ec8e8ea8b77 (\u0026quot;mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing\nmemory_section-\u0026gt;usage\u0026quot;) changed pfn_section_valid() to add a READ_ONCE()\ncall around \u0026quot;ms-\u0026gt;usage\u0026quot; to fix a race with section_deactivate() where\nms-\u0026gt;usage can be cleared. The READ_ONCE() call, by itself, is not enough\nto prevent NULL pointer dereference. We need to check its value before\ndereferencing it.(CVE-2024-41055)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release\r\n\r\nThe problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work,\nwhere the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n sock_close hci_rx_work\n\t l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet\n\t l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame\n\t sk_free l2cap_conless_channel\n\t l2cap_sock_recv_cb\r\n\r\nIf hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is\nclosed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the\nreleased sock when receiving data.\r\n\r\nAdd a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between\nthe sock release and recv cb.\r\n\r\nSock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.(CVE-2024-41062)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: hci_core: cancel all works upon hci_unregister_dev()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is reporting that calling hci_release_dev() from hci_error_reset()\ndue to hci_dev_put() from hci_error_reset() can cause deadlock at\ndestroy_workqueue(), for hci_error_reset() is called from\nhdev-\u0026gt;req_workqueue which destroy_workqueue() needs to flush.\r\n\r\nWe need to make sure that hdev-\u0026gt;{rx_work,cmd_work,tx_work} which are\nqueued into hdev-\u0026gt;workqueue and hdev-\u0026gt;{power_on,error_reset} which are\nqueued into hdev-\u0026gt;req_workqueue are no longer running by the moment\r\n\r\n destroy_workqueue(hdev-\u0026gt;workqueue);\n destroy_workqueue(hdev-\u0026gt;req_workqueue);\r\n\r\nare called from hci_release_dev().\r\n\r\nCall cancel_work_sync() on these work items from hci_unregister_dev()\nas soon as hdev-\u0026gt;list is removed from hci_dev_list.(CVE-2024-41063)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/eeh: avoid possible crash when edev-\u0026gt;pdev changes\r\n\r\nIf a PCI device is removed during eeh_pe_report_edev(), edev-\u0026gt;pdev\nwill change and can cause a crash, hold the PCI rescan/remove lock\nwhile taking a copy of edev-\u0026gt;pdev-\u0026gt;bus.(CVE-2024-41064)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nibmvnic: Add tx check to prevent skb leak\r\n\r\nBelow is a summary of how the driver stores a reference to an skb during\ntransmit:\n tx_buff[free_map[consumer_index]]-\u0026gt;skb = new_skb;\n free_map[consumer_index] = IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP;\n consumer_index ++;\nWhere variable data looks like this:\n free_map == [4, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, IBMVNIC_INVALID_MAP, 0, 3]\n \tconsumer_index^\n tx_buff == [skb=null, skb=\u0026lt;ptr\u0026gt;, skb=\u0026lt;ptr\u0026gt;, skb=null, skb=null]\r\n\r\nThe driver has checks to ensure that free_map[consumer_index] pointed to\na valid index but there was no check to ensure that this index pointed\nto an unused/null skb address. So, if, by some chance, our free_map and\ntx_buff lists become out of sync then we were previously risking an\nskb memory leak. This could then cause tcp congestion control to stop\nsending packets, eventually leading to ETIMEDOUT.\r\n\r\nTherefore, add a conditional to ensure that the skb address is null. If\nnot then warn the user (because this is still a bug that should be\npatched) and free the old pointer to prevent memleak/tcp problems.(CVE-2024-41066)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: topology: Fix references to freed memory\r\n\r\nMost users after parsing a topology file, release memory used by it, so\nhaving pointer references directly into topology file contents is wrong.\nUse devm_kmemdup(), to allocate memory as needed.(CVE-2024-41069)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Prevent UAF in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group()\r\n\r\nAl reported a possible use-after-free (UAF) in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group().\r\n\r\nIt looks up `stt` from tablefd, but then continues to use it after doing\nfdput() on the returned fd. After the fdput() the tablefd is free to be\nclosed by another thread. The close calls kvm_spapr_tce_release() and\nthen release_spapr_tce_table() (via call_rcu()) which frees `stt`.\r\n\r\nAlthough there are calls to rcu_read_lock() in\nkvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group() they are not sufficient to prevent\nthe UAF, because `stt` is used outside the locked regions.\r\n\r\nWith an artifcial delay after the fdput() and a userspace program which\ntriggers the race, KASAN detects the UAF:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm]\n Read of size 4 at addr c000200027552c30 by task kvm-vfio/2505\n CPU: 54 PID: 2505 Comm: kvm-vfio Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240612-dirty #1\n Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0x108 (unreliable)\n print_report+0x2b4/0x6ec\n kasan_report+0x118/0x2b0\n __asan_load4+0xb8/0xd0\n kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group+0x298/0x720 [kvm]\n kvm_vfio_set_attr+0x524/0xac0 [kvm]\n kvm_device_ioctl+0x144/0x240 [kvm]\n sys_ioctl+0x62c/0x1810\n system_call_exception+0x190/0x440\n system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec\n ...\n Freed by task 0:\n ...\n kfree+0xec/0x3e0\n release_spapr_tce_table+0xd4/0x11c [kvm]\n rcu_core+0x568/0x16a0\n handle_softirqs+0x23c/0x920\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x6c/0x90\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x58/0x90\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x218/0x2d0\n irq_exit+0x30/0x80\n arch_local_irq_restore+0x128/0x230\n arch_local_irq_enable+0x1c/0x30\n cpuidle_enter_state+0x134/0x5cc\n cpuidle_enter+0x6c/0xb0\n call_cpuidle+0x7c/0x100\n do_idle+0x394/0x410\n cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x70\n start_secondary+0x3fc/0x410\n start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14\r\n\r\nFix it by delaying the fdput() until `stt` is no longer in use, which\nis effectively the entire function. To keep the patch minimal add a call\nto fdput() at each of the existing return paths. Future work can convert\nthe function to goto or __cleanup style cleanup.\r\n\r\nWith the fix in place the test case no longer triggers the UAF.(CVE-2024-41070)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: wext: add extra SIOCSIWSCAN data check\r\n\r\nIn \u0026apos;cfg80211_wext_siwscan()\u0026apos;, add extra check whether number of\nchannels passed via \u0026apos;ioctl(sock, SIOCSIWSCAN, ...)\u0026apos; doesn\u0026apos;t exceed\nIW_MAX_FREQUENCIES and reject invalid request with -EINVAL otherwise.(CVE-2024-41072)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme: avoid double free special payload\r\n\r\nIf a discard request needs to be retried, and that retry may fail before\na new special payload is added, a double free will result. Clear the\nRQF_SPECIAL_LOAD when the request is cleaned.(CVE-2024-41073)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnull_blk: fix validation of block size\r\n\r\nBlock size should be between 512 and PAGE_SIZE and be a power of 2. The current\ncheck does not validate this, so update the check.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, null_blk would Oops due to a null pointer deref when\nloaded with bs=1536 [1].\r\n\r\n\n[axboe: remove unnecessary braces and != 0 check](CVE-2024-41077)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvmet: always initialize cqe.result\r\n\r\nThe spec doesn\u0026apos;t mandate that the first two double words (aka results)\nfor the command queue entry need to be set to 0 when they are not\nused (not specified). Though, the target implemention returns 0 for TCP\nand FC but not for RDMA.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s make RDMA behave the same and thus explicitly initializing the\nresult field. This prevents leaking any data from the stack.(CVE-2024-41079)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: fix possible deadlock in io_register_iowq_max_workers()\r\n\r\nThe io_register_iowq_max_workers() function calls io_put_sq_data(),\nwhich acquires the sqd-\u0026gt;lock without releasing the uring_lock.\nSimilar to the commit 009ad9f0c6ee (\u0026quot;io_uring: drop ctx-\u0026gt;uring_lock\nbefore acquiring sqd-\u0026gt;lock\u0026quot;), this can lead to a potential deadlock\nsituation.\r\n\r\nTo resolve this issue, the uring_lock is released before calling\nio_put_sq_data(), and then it is re-acquired after the function call.\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the locks are acquired in the correct\norder, preventing the possibility of a deadlock.(CVE-2024-41080)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nila: block BH in ila_output()\r\n\r\nAs explained in commit 1378817486d6 (\u0026quot;tipc: block BH\nbefore using dst_cache\u0026quot;), net/core/dst_cache.c\nhelpers need to be called with BH disabled.\r\n\r\nila_output() is called from lwtunnel_output()\npossibly from process context, and under rcu_read_lock().\r\n\r\nWe might be interrupted by a softirq, re-enter ila_output()\nand corrupt dst_cache data structures.\r\n\r\nFix the race by using local_bh_disable().(CVE-2024-41081)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nata: libata-core: Fix double free on error\r\n\r\nIf e.g. the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, we will jump\nto the err_out label, which will call devres_release_group().\ndevres_release_group() will trigger a call to ata_host_release().\nata_host_release() calls kfree(host), so executing the kfree(host) in\nata_host_alloc() will lead to a double free:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at mm/slub.c:553!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 11 PID: 599 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #47\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\nCode: 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 80 d6 ff ff 4d 89 f1 41 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 d9 48 89 da\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000f377f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RBX: ffff888112b1f2c0 RCX: ffff888112b1f320\nRDX: 000000000000400b RSI: ffffffffc02c9de5 RDI: ffff888112b1f2c0\nRBP: ffffc90000f37830 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc90000f37610 R11: 617461203a736b6e R12: ffffea00044ac780\nR13: ffff888100046400 R14: ffffffffc02c9de5 R15: 0000000000000006\nFS: 00007f2f1cabe980(0000) GS:ffff88813b380000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f2f1c3acf75 CR3: 0000000111724000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27\n ? die+0x2e/0x50\n ? do_trap+0xca/0x110\n ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ? ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ? kfree+0x2cf/0x2f0\n ata_host_alloc+0xf5/0x120 [libata]\n ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata]\n ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]\r\n\r\nEnsure that we will not call kfree(host) twice, by performing the kfree()\nonly if the devres_open_group() call failed.(CVE-2024-41087)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_hd_modes\r\n\r\nIn nv17_tv_get_hd_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). The same applies to drm_cvt_mode().\nAdd a check to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-41089)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntap: add missing verification for short frame\r\n\r\nThe cited commit missed to check against the validity of the frame length\nin the tap_get_user_xdp() path, which could cause a corrupted skb to be\nsent downstack. Even before the skb is transmitted, the\ntap_get_user_xdp()--\u0026gt;skb_set_network_header() may assume the size is more\nthan ETH_HLEN. Once transmitted, this could either cause out-of-bound\naccess beyond the actual length, or confuse the underlayer with incorrect\nor inconsistent header length in the skb metadata.\r\n\r\nIn the alternative path, tap_get_user() already prohibits short frame which\nhas the length less than Ethernet header size from being transmitted.\r\n\r\nThis is to drop any frame shorter than the Ethernet header size just like\nhow tap_get_user() does.\r\n\r\nCVE: CVE-2024-41090(CVE-2024-41090)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntun: add missing verification for short frame\r\n\r\nThe cited commit missed to check against the validity of the frame length\nin the tun_xdp_one() path, which could cause a corrupted skb to be sent\ndownstack. Even before the skb is transmitted, the\ntun_xdp_one--\u0026gt;eth_type_trans() may access the Ethernet header although it\ncan be less than ETH_HLEN. Once transmitted, this could either cause\nout-of-bound access beyond the actual length, or confuse the underlayer\nwith incorrect or inconsistent header length in the skb metadata.\r\n\r\nIn the alternative path, tun_get_user() already prohibits short frame which\nhas the length less than Ethernet header size from being transmitted for\nIFF_TAP.\r\n\r\nThis is to drop any frame shorter than the Ethernet header size just like\nhow tun_get_user() does.\r\n\r\nCVE: CVE-2024-41091(CVE-2024-41091)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: atm: cxacru: fix endpoint checking in cxacru_bind()\r\n\r\nSyzbot is still reporting quite an old issue [1] that occurs due to\nincomplete checking of present usb endpoints. As such, wrong\nendpoints types may be used at urb sumbitting stage which in turn\ntriggers a warning in usb_submit_urb().\r\n\r\nFix the issue by verifying that required endpoint types are present\nfor both in and out endpoints, taking into account cmd endpoint type.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, this patch has not been tested on real hardware.\r\n\r\n[1] Syzbot report:\nusb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 1 != type 3\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8667 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502 usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 8667 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nWorkqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event\nRIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed2/0x18a0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:502\n...\nCall Trace:\n cxacru_cm+0x3c0/0x8e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:649\n cxacru_card_status+0x22/0xd0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:760\n cxacru_bind+0x7ac/0x11a0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1209\n usbatm_usb_probe+0x321/0x1ae0 drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c:1055\n cxacru_usb_probe+0xdf/0x1e0 drivers/usb/atm/cxacru.c:1363\n usb_probe_interface+0x315/0x7f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 [inline]\n really_probe+0x23c/0xcd0 drivers/base/dd.c:595\n __driver_probe_device+0x338/0x4d0 drivers/base/dd.c:747\n driver_probe_device+0x4c/0x1a0 drivers/base/dd.c:777\n __device_attach_driver+0x20b/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:894\n bus_for_each_drv+0x15f/0x1e0 drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach+0x228/0x4a0 drivers/base/dd.c:965\n bus_probe_device+0x1e4/0x290 drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add+0xc2f/0x2180 drivers/base/core.c:3354\n usb_set_configuration+0x113a/0x1910 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170\n usb_generic_driver_probe+0xba/0x100 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238\n usb_probe_device+0xd9/0x2c0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293(CVE-2024-41097)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()\r\n\r\nset_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.\r\n\r\nCheck its return and take it into account as an error.(CVE-2024-42068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: can: j1939: Initialize unused data in j1939_send_one()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported kernel-infoleak in raw_recvmsg() [1]. j1939_send_one()\ncreates full frame including unused data, but it doesn\u0026apos;t initialize\nit. This causes the kernel-infoleak issue. Fix this by initializing\nunused data.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline]\n memcpy_to_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4113 [inline]\n raw_recvmsg+0x2b8/0x9e0 net/can/raw.c:1008\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068\n ____sys_recvmsg+0x18a/0x620 net/socket.c:2803\n ___sys_recvmsg+0x223/0x840 net/socket.c:2845\n do_recvmmsg+0x4fc/0xfd0 net/socket.c:2939\n __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline]\n __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x397/0x490 net/socket.c:3034\n x64_sys_call+0xf6c/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:300\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline]\n alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504\n sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795\n sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1842 [inline]\n j1939_sk_alloc_skb net/can/j1939/socket.c:878 [inline]\n j1939_sk_send_loop net/can/j1939/socket.c:1142 [inline]\n j1939_sk_sendmsg+0xc0a/0x2730 net/can/j1939/socket.c:1277\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674\n x64_sys_call+0xc4b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nBytes 12-15 of 16 are uninitialized\nMemory access of size 16 starts at ffff888120969690\nData copied to user address 00000000200017c0\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5050 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00031-g71b1543c83d6 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024(CVE-2024-42076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits\r\n\r\nThe code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary\ntransaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does\nnot take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can\ncontain arbitrary number of extents.\r\n\r\nExtent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not\nin all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in\nthe tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling\nocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the\ncurrent transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if\nthe IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a\nWARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) \u0026lt;= 0) is triggered in\njbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to\nthis error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a\nheavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for\none extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().\r\n\r\nHeming Zhao said:\r\n\r\n------\nPANIC: \u0026quot;Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nPID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: \u0026quot;SubmitThread-CA\u0026quot;\n #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932\n #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa\n #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9\n #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2]\n #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2]\n #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2]\n #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2]\n #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2]\n #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2]\n #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]\n#10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]\n#11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7\n#12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f\n#13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]\n#14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14\n#15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b\n#16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]\n#17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e\n#18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde\n#19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada\n#20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984\n#21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba(CVE-2024-42077)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access\r\n\r\nstruct rdma_restrack_entry\u0026apos;s kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME\nin ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this\nrdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in\nrdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.\r\n\r\nThese code is used to help find one forgotten PD release in one of the\nULPs. But it is not needed anymore, so delete them.(CVE-2024-42080)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().\r\n\r\nThe warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It\nreturns the error in two cases:\r\n\r\n 1. memory allocation fails;\n 2. rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params\n struct are not initialized properly.\r\n\r\nThe second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params\nstruct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a\nproblem with memory allocation.\r\n\r\nThus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be\nsafely removed.\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nRIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\r\n\r\nCall Trace:\n xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344\n xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline]\n bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377\n bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240\n __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.(CVE-2024-42082)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nftruncate: pass a signed offset\r\n\r\nThe old ftruncate() syscall, using the 32-bit off_t misses a sign\nextension when called in compat mode on 64-bit architectures. As a\nresult, passing a negative length accidentally succeeds in truncating\nto file size between 2GiB and 4GiB.\r\n\r\nChanging the type of the compat syscall to the signed compat_off_t\nchanges the behavior so it instead returns -EINVAL.\r\n\r\nThe native entry point, the truncate() syscall and the corresponding\nloff_t based variants are all correct already and do not suffer\nfrom this mistake.(CVE-2024-42084)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: chemical: bme680: Fix overflows in compensate() functions\r\n\r\nThere are cases in the compensate functions of the driver that\nthere could be overflows of variables due to bit shifting ops.\nThese implications were initially discussed here [1] and they\nwere mentioned in log message of Commit 1b3bd8592780 (\u0026quot;iio:\nchemical: Add support for Bosch BME680 sensor\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20180728114028.3c1bbe81@archlinux/(CVE-2024-42086)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: fsl-asoc-card: set priv-\u0026gt;pdev before using it\r\n\r\npriv-\u0026gt;pdev pointer was set after being used in\nfsl_asoc_card_audmux_init().\nMove this assignment at the start of the probe function, so\nsub-functions can correctly use pdev through priv.\r\n\r\nfsl_asoc_card_audmux_init() dereferences priv-\u0026gt;pdev to get access to the\ndev struct, used with dev_err macros.\nAs priv is zero-initialised, there would be a NULL pointer dereference.\nNote that if priv-\u0026gt;dev is dereferenced before assignment but never used,\nfor example if there is no error to be printed, the driver won\u0026apos;t crash\nprobably due to compiler optimisations.(CVE-2024-42089)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: fix deadlock in create_pinctrl() when handling -EPROBE_DEFER\r\n\r\nIn create_pinctrl(), pinctrl_maps_mutex is acquired before calling\nadd_setting(). If add_setting() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, create_pinctrl()\ncalls pinctrl_free(). However, pinctrl_free() attempts to acquire\npinctrl_maps_mutex, which is already held by create_pinctrl(), leading to\na potential deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis patch resolves the issue by releasing pinctrl_maps_mutex before\ncalling pinctrl_free(), preventing the deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-42090)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: davinci: Validate the obtained number of IRQs\r\n\r\nValue of pdata-\u0026gt;gpio_unbanked is taken from Device Tree. In case of broken\nDT due to any error this value can be any. Without this value validation\nthere can be out of chips-\u0026gt;irqs array boundaries access in\ndavinci_gpio_probe().\r\n\r\nValidate the obtained nirq value so that it won\u0026apos;t exceed the maximum\nnumber of IRQs per bank.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42092)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/dpaa2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack\r\n\r\nFor CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask\nvariable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack\noverflow.\r\n\r\nInstead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate\ncpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to\nCONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.\r\n\r\nUse *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42093)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack\r\n\r\nFor CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask\nvariable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack\noverflow.\r\n\r\nInstead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate\ncpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to\nCONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.\r\n\r\nUse *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.(CVE-2024-42094)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: emux: improve patch ioctl data validation\r\n\r\nIn load_data(), make the validation of and skipping over the main info\nblock match that in load_guspatch().\r\n\r\nIn load_guspatch(), add checking that the specified patch length matches\nthe actually supplied data, like load_data() already did.(CVE-2024-42097)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau: fix null pointer dereference in nouveau_connector_get_modes\r\n\r\nIn nouveau_connector_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate()\nis assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer\ndereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42101)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninet_diag: Initialize pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in raw_lookup() [1]. Diag for raw\nsockets uses the pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2 for the\nunderlying protocol. This field corresponds to the sdiag_raw_protocol\nfield in struct inet_diag_req_raw.\r\n\r\ninet_diag_get_exact_compat() converts inet_diag_req to\ninet_diag_req_v2, but leaves the pad field uninitialized. So the issue\noccurs when raw_lookup() accesses the sdiag_raw_protocol field.\r\n\r\nFix this by initializing the pad field in\ninet_diag_get_exact_compat(). Also, do the same fix in\ninet_diag_dump_compat() to avoid the similar issue in the future.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline]\n raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99\n inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564\n sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675\n x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n raw_sock_get+0x650/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71\n raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99\n inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564\n sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675\n x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nLocal variable req.i created at:\n inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1396 [inline]\n inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2a6/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8888 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-42106)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njffs2: Fix potential illegal address access in jffs2_free_inode\r\n\r\nDuring the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following\nabnormal printouts were found:\n[ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948\n[ 2430.649622] Mem abort info:\n[ 2430.649829] ESR = 0x96000004\n[ 2430.650115] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 2430.650564] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 2430.650795] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 2430.651032] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n[ 2430.651446] Data abort info:\n[ 2430.651683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004\n[ 2430.652001] CM = 0, WnR = 0\n[ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges\n[ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n[ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33\n[ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n[ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348\n[ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48\n[ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10\n[ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000\n[ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000\n[ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14\n[ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000\n[ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000\n[ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19\n[ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14\n[ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302\n[ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342\n[ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000\n[ 2430.664217] Call trace:\n[ 2430.664528] kfree+0x78/0x348\n[ 2430.664855] jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48\n[ 2430.665233] i_callback+0x24/0x50\n[ 2430.665528] rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448\n[ 2430.665892] rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8\n[ 2430.666151] rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28\n[ 2430.666473] __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc\n[ 2430.666781] irq_exit+0xf0/0x110\n[ 2430.667065] handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98\n[ 2430.667447] gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8\n[ 2430.667739] call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54\nThe parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of\nthe jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info\nstructure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these\nvariables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing,\nwhich is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the\nfunction jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in\nthe function jffs2_init_inode_info.\r\n\r\nThe function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked,\nbut in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered,\nwhich releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode\nis not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked\nmay enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code.\r\n\r\nSince the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target,\nthe fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once.(CVE-2024-42115)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedf: Make qedf_execute_tmf() non-preemptible\r\n\r\nStop calling smp_processor_id() from preemptible code in\nqedf_execute_tmf90. This results in BUG_ON() when running an RT kernel.\r\n\r\n[ 659.343280] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sg_reset/3646\n[ 659.343282] caller is qedf_execute_tmf+0x8b/0x360 [qedf](CVE-2024-42124)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: mlxreg: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization\r\n\r\nIn this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register()\nso they are automatically unregistered after module\u0026apos;s remove() is done.\nled_classdev_unregister() calls module\u0026apos;s led_set_brightness() to turn off\nthe LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already\nin module\u0026apos;s remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42129)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: Fix BT enable failure again for QCA6390 after warm reboot\r\n\r\nCommit 272970be3dab (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix driver shutdown on closed\nserdev\u0026quot;) will cause below regression issue:\r\n\r\nBT can\u0026apos;t be enabled after below steps:\ncold boot -\u0026gt; enable BT -\u0026gt; disable BT -\u0026gt; warm reboot -\u0026gt; BT enable failure\nif property enable-gpios is not configured within DT|ACPI for QCA6390.\r\n\r\nThe commit is to fix a use-after-free issue within qca_serdev_shutdown()\nby adding condition to avoid the serdev is flushed or wrote after closed\nbut also introduces this regression issue regarding above steps since the\nVSC is not sent to reset controller during warm reboot.\r\n\r\nFixed by sending the VSC to reset controller within qca_serdev_shutdown()\nonce BT was ever enabled, and the use-after-free issue is also fixed by\nthis change since the serdev is still opened before it is flushed or wrote.\r\n\r\nVerified by the reported machine Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop over below two\nkernel commits:\ncommit e00fc2700a3f (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump\nimplementation for QCA\u0026quot;) of bluetooth-next tree.\ncommit b23d98d46d28 (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: btusb: Fix triggering coredump\nimplementation for QCA\u0026quot;) of linus mainline tree.(CVE-2024-42137)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List\r\n\r\nThe existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD\npackets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth.\nAs user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate\nof extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading\nto potential list overflow.\r\n\r\nTo address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After\nconsidering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can\nhandle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry\ntimeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets\nreceived beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed\nout by the time they are handled by user-space.\r\n\r\nNotably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like\ntimed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.(CVE-2024-42145)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe copies of protected- and secure-keys\r\n\r\nAlthough the clear-key of neither protected- nor secure-keys is\naccessible, this key material should only be visible to the calling\nprocess. So wipe all copies of protected- or secure-keys from stack,\neven in case of an error.(CVE-2024-42155)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()\r\n\r\n- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(),\nlet\u0026apos;s fix to add check condition in f2fs_build_fault_attr().\n- Use f2fs_build_fault_attr() in __sbi_store() to clean up code.(CVE-2024-42160)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Avoid uninitialized value in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD\r\n\r\n[Changes from V1:\n - Use a default branch in the switch statement to initialize `val\u0026apos;.]\r\n\r\nGCC warns that `val\u0026apos; may be used uninitialized in the\nBPF_CRE_READ_BITFIELD macro, defined in bpf_core_read.h as:\r\n\r\n\t[...]\n\tunsigned long long val;\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t[...]\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\tswitch (__CORE_RELO(s, field, BYTE_SIZE)) {\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 1: val = *(const unsigned char *)p; break;\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 2: val = *(const unsigned short *)p; break;\t\t \\\n\tcase 4: val = *(const unsigned int *)p; break;\t\t\t \\\n\tcase 8: val = *(const unsigned long long *)p; break;\t\t \\\n } \t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t[...]\n\tval;\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\n\t}\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \\\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a default entry in the switch statement that sets\n`val\u0026apos; to zero in order to avoid the warning, and random values to be\nused in case __builtin_preserve_field_info returns unexpected values\nfor BPF_FIELD_BYTE_SIZE.\r\n\r\nTested in bpf-next master.\nNo regressions.(CVE-2024-42161)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngve: Account for stopped queues when reading NIC stats\r\n\r\nWe now account for the fact that the NIC might send us stats for a\nsubset of queues. Without this change, gve_get_ethtool_stats might make\nan invalid access on the priv-\u0026gt;stats_report-\u0026gt;stats array.(CVE-2024-42162)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Correct check for empty list\r\n\r\nSince commit a3c53be55c95 (\u0026quot;net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO\nbusses\u0026quot;) mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus() has checked that the\nreturn value of list_first_entry() is non-NULL.\r\n\r\nThis appears to be intended to guard against the list chip-\u0026gt;mdios being\nempty. However, it is not the correct check as the implementation of\nlist_first_entry is not designed to return NULL for empty lists.\r\n\r\nInstead, use list_first_entry_or_null() which does return NULL if the\nlist is empty.\r\n\r\nFlagged by Smatch.\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2024-42224)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Using uninitialized value *size when calling amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc\r\n\r\nInitialize the size before calling amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc, such as case 0x03000001.\nV2: To really improve the handling we would actually\n need to have a separate value of 0xffffffff.(Christian)(CVE-2024-42228)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1962",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:26Z",
"published": "2024-08-09T11:07:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1962"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47382"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38561"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41073"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41080"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42160"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42162"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42228"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47382",
"CVE-2022-48827",
"CVE-2023-52887",
"CVE-2024-33621",
"CVE-2024-35825",
"CVE-2024-38546",
"CVE-2024-38561",
"CVE-2024-38594",
"CVE-2024-38627",
"CVE-2024-39497",
"CVE-2024-39507",
"CVE-2024-40910",
"CVE-2024-40953",
"CVE-2024-40959",
"CVE-2024-40961",
"CVE-2024-40976",
"CVE-2024-40988",
"CVE-2024-40999",
"CVE-2024-41006",
"CVE-2024-41013",
"CVE-2024-41014",
"CVE-2024-41019",
"CVE-2024-41020",
"CVE-2024-41022",
"CVE-2024-41023",
"CVE-2024-41027",
"CVE-2024-41040",
"CVE-2024-41041",
"CVE-2024-41044",
"CVE-2024-41048",
"CVE-2024-41049",
"CVE-2024-41055",
"CVE-2024-41062",
"CVE-2024-41063",
"CVE-2024-41064",
"CVE-2024-41066",
"CVE-2024-41069",
"CVE-2024-41070",
"CVE-2024-41072",
"CVE-2024-41073",
"CVE-2024-41077",
"CVE-2024-41079",
"CVE-2024-41080",
"CVE-2024-41081",
"CVE-2024-41087",
"CVE-2024-41089",
"CVE-2024-41090",
"CVE-2024-41091",
"CVE-2024-41097",
"CVE-2024-42068",
"CVE-2024-42076",
"CVE-2024-42077",
"CVE-2024-42080",
"CVE-2024-42082",
"CVE-2024-42084",
"CVE-2024-42086",
"CVE-2024-42089",
"CVE-2024-42090",
"CVE-2024-42092",
"CVE-2024-42093",
"CVE-2024-42094",
"CVE-2024-42097",
"CVE-2024-42101",
"CVE-2024-42106",
"CVE-2024-42115",
"CVE-2024-42124",
"CVE-2024-42129",
"CVE-2024-42137",
"CVE-2024-42145",
"CVE-2024-42155",
"CVE-2024-42160",
"CVE-2024-42161",
"CVE-2024-42162",
"CVE-2024-42224",
"CVE-2024-42228"
]
}
OESA-2024-1992 (CVE-2021-47582)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-08-16 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: core: Make do_proc_control() and do_proc_bulk() killable
The USBDEVFS_CONTROL and USBDEVFS_BULK ioctls invoke usb_start_wait_urb(), which contains an uninterruptible wait with a user-specified timeout value. If timeout value is very large and the device being accessed does not respond in a reasonable amount of time, the kernel will complain about "Task X blocked for more than N seconds", as found in testing by syzbot:
INFO: task syz-executor.0:8700 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor.0 state:D stack:23192 pid: 8700 ppid: 8455 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4681 [inline] __schedule+0xc07/0x11f0 kernel/sched/core.c:5938 schedule+0x14b/0x210 kernel/sched/core.c:6017 schedule_timeout+0x98/0x2f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1857 do_wait_for_common+0x2da/0x480 kernel/sched/completion.c:85 __wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:106 [inline] wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:117 [inline] wait_for_completion_timeout+0x46/0x60 kernel/sched/completion.c:157 usb_start_wait_urb+0x167/0x550 drivers/usb/core/message.c:63 do_proc_bulk+0x978/0x1080 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1236 proc_bulk drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1273 [inline] usbdev_do_ioctl drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2547 [inline] usbdev_ioctl+0x3441/0x6b10 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2713 ...
To fix this problem, this patch replaces usbfs's calls to usb_control_msg() and usb_bulk_msg() with special-purpose code that does essentially the same thing (as recommended in the comment for usb_start_wait_urb()), except that it always uses a killable wait and it uses GFP_KERNEL rather than GFP_NOIO.(CVE-2021-47582)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX
Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request.
The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ.
Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.
Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Only free buffer VA that is not NULL
In the MediaTek vcodec driver, while mtk_vcodec_mem_free() is mostly called only when the buffer to free exists, there are some instances that didn't do the check and triggered warnings in practice.
We believe those checks were forgotten unintentionally. Add the checks back to fix the warnings.(CVE-2023-52888)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: core: remove unnecessary WARN_ON() in implement()
Syzkaller hit a warning [1] in a call to implement() when trying to write a value into a field of smaller size in an output report.
Since implement() already has a warn message printed out with the help of hid_warn() and value in question gets trimmed with: ... value &= m; ... WARN_ON may be considered superfluous. Remove it to suppress future syzkaller triggers.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5084 at drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 implement drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5084 at drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 hid_output_report+0x548/0x760 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1863 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor424 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00183-gcf87f46fd34d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 RIP: 0010:implement drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 [inline] RIP: 0010:hid_output_report+0x548/0x760 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1863 ... Call Trace: <TASK> __usbhid_submit_report drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:591 [inline] usbhid_submit_report+0x43d/0x9e0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:636 hiddev_ioctl+0x138b/0x1f00 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:726 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ...(CVE-2024-39509)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: mesh: Fix leak of mesh_preq_queue objects
The hwmp code use objects of type mesh_preq_queue, added to a list in ieee80211_if_mesh, to keep track of mpath we need to resolve. If the mpath gets deleted, ex mesh interface is removed, the entries in that list will never get cleaned. Fix this by flushing all corresponding items of the preq_queue in mesh_path_flush_pending().
This should take care of KASAN reports like this:
unreferenced object 0xffff00000668d800 (size 128): comm "kworker/u8:4", pid 67, jiffies 4295419552 (age 1836.444s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 1f 05 09 00 00 ff ff 00 d5 68 06 00 00 ff ff ..........h..... 8e 97 ea eb 3e b8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....>........... backtrace: [<000000007302a0b6>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e0/0x35c [<00000000049bd418>] kmalloc_trace+0x34/0x80 [<0000000000d792bb>] mesh_queue_preq+0x44/0x2a8 [<00000000c99c3696>] mesh_nexthop_resolve+0x198/0x19c [<00000000926bf598>] ieee80211_xmit+0x1d0/0x1f4 [<00000000fc8c2284>] __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x30c/0x764 [<000000005926ee38>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x9c/0x7a4 [<000000004c86e916>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x174/0x440 [<0000000023495647>] __dev_queue_xmit+0xe24/0x111c [<00000000cfe9ca78>] batadv_send_skb_packet+0x180/0x1e4 [<000000007bacc5d5>] batadv_v_elp_periodic_work+0x2f4/0x508 [<00000000adc3cd94>] process_one_work+0x4b8/0xa1c [<00000000b36425d1>] worker_thread+0x9c/0x634 [<0000000005852dd5>] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c4 [<000000005fccd770>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff000009051f00 (size 128): comm "kworker/u8:4", pid 67, jiffies 4295419553 (age 1836.440s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 90 d6 92 0d 00 00 ff ff 00 d8 68 06 00 00 ff ff ..........h..... 36 27 92 e4 02 e0 01 00 00 58 79 06 00 00 ff ff 6'.......Xy..... backtrace: [<000000007302a0b6>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e0/0x35c [<00000000049bd418>] kmalloc_trace+0x34/0x80 [<0000000000d792bb>] mesh_queue_preq+0x44/0x2a8 [<00000000c99c3696>] mesh_nexthop_resolve+0x198/0x19c [<00000000926bf598>] ieee80211_xmit+0x1d0/0x1f4 [<00000000fc8c2284>] __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x30c/0x764 [<000000005926ee38>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x9c/0x7a4 [<000000004c86e916>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x174/0x440 [<0000000023495647>] __dev_queue_xmit+0xe24/0x111c [<00000000cfe9ca78>] batadv_send_skb_packet+0x180/0x1e4 [<000000007bacc5d5>] batadv_v_elp_periodic_work+0x2f4/0x508 [<00000000adc3cd94>] process_one_work+0x4b8/0xa1c [<00000000b36425d1>] worker_thread+0x9c/0x634 [<0000000005852dd5>] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c4 [<000000005fccd770>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-40942)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/mlx5: Add check for srq max_sge attribute
max_sge attribute is passed by the user, and is inserted and used unchecked, so verify that the value doesn't exceed maximum allowed value before using it.(CVE-2024-40990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected
When fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with do_lock_file_wait(). However, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock while denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock. Separately, posix_lock_file() could also fail to remove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range in the middle).
After the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in lock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used to read arbitrary kernel memory, but can't corrupt kernel memory.
Fix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to reliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and files_struct and is also used by filp_flush().(CVE-2024-41012)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix kernel bug on rename operation of broken directory
Syzbot reported that in rename directory operation on broken directory on nilfs2, __block_write_begin_int() called to prepare block write may fail BUG_ON check for access exceeding the folio/page size.
This is because nilfs_dotdot(), which gets parent directory reference entry ("..") of the directory to be moved or renamed, does not check consistency enough, and may return location exceeding folio/page size for broken directories.
Fix this issue by checking required directory entries ("." and "..") in the first chunk of the directory in nilfs_dotdot().(CVE-2024-41034)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: core: Fix duplicate endpoint bug by clearing reserved bits in the descriptor
Syzbot has identified a bug in usbcore (see the Closes: tag below) caused by our assumption that the reserved bits in an endpoint descriptor's bEndpointAddress field will always be 0. As a result of the bug, the endpoint_is_duplicate() routine in config.c (and possibly other routines as well) may believe that two descriptors are for distinct endpoints, even though they have the same direction and endpoint number. This can lead to confusion, including the bug identified by syzbot (two descriptors with matching endpoint numbers and directions, where one was interrupt and the other was bulk).
To fix the bug, we will clear the reserved bits in bEndpointAddress when we parse the descriptor. (Note that both the USB-2.0 and USB-3.1 specs say these bits are "Reserved, reset to zero".) This requires us to make a copy of the descriptor earlier in usb_parse_endpoint() and use the copy instead of the original when checking for duplicates.(CVE-2024-41035)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_chain_validate
nft_chain_validate already performs loop detection because a cycle will result in a call stack overflow (ctx->level >= NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE).
It also follows maps via ->validate callback in nft_lookup, so there appears no reason to iterate the maps again.
nf_tables_check_loops() and all its helper functions can be removed. This improves ruleset load time significantly, from 23s down to 12s.
This also fixes a crash bug. Old loop detection code can result in unbounded recursion:
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at .... Oops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 4 PID: 1539 Comm: nft Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5+ #1 [..]
with a suitable ruleset during validation of register stores.
I can't see any actual reason to attempt to check for this from nft_validate_register_store(), at this point the transaction is still in progress, so we don't have a full picture of the rule graph.
For nf-next it might make sense to either remove it or make this depend on table->validate_state in case we could catch an error earlier (for improved error reporting to userspace).(CVE-2024-41042)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ethernet: lantiq_etop: fix double free in detach
The number of the currently released descriptor is never incremented which results in the same skb being released multiple times.(CVE-2024-41046)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/pseries: Whitelist dtl slub object for copying to userspace
Reading the dispatch trace log from /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/dtl/cpu-* results in a BUG() when the config CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled as shown below.
kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c dm_service_time sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvfc
scsi_transport_fc ibmveth pseries_wdt dm_multipath dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse
CPU: 27 PID: 1815 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3 #85
Hardware name: IBM,9040-MRX POWER10 (raw) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NM1060_042) hv:phyp pSeries
NIP: c0000000005d23d4 LR: c0000000005d23d0 CTR: 00000000006ee6f8
REGS: c000000120c078c0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.10.0-rc3)
MSR: 8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 2828220f XER: 0000000e
CFAR: c0000000001fdc80 IRQMASK: 0
[ ... GPRs omitted ... ]
NIP [c0000000005d23d4] usercopy_abort+0x78/0xb0
LR [c0000000005d23d0] usercopy_abort+0x74/0xb0
Call Trace:
usercopy_abort+0x74/0xb0 (unreliable)
__check_heap_object+0xf8/0x120
check_heap_object+0x218/0x240
__check_object_size+0x84/0x1a4
dtl_file_read+0x17c/0x2c4
full_proxy_read+0x8c/0x110
vfs_read+0xdc/0x3a0
ksys_read+0x84/0x144
system_call_exception+0x124/0x330
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
--- interrupt: 3000 at 0x7fff81f3ab34
Commit 6d07d1cd300f ("usercopy: Restrict non-usercopy caches to size 0") requires that only whitelisted areas in slab/slub objects can be copied to userspace when usercopy hardening is enabled using CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY. Dtl contains hypervisor dispatch events which are expected to be read by privileged users. Hence mark this safe for user access. Specify useroffset=0 and usersize=DISPATCH_LOG_BYTES to whitelist the entire object.(CVE-2024-41065)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: qgroup: fix quota root leak after quota disable failure
If during the quota disable we fail when cleaning the quota tree or when deleting the root from the root tree, we jump to the 'out' label without ever dropping the reference on the quota root, resulting in a leak of the root since fs_info->quota_root is no longer pointing to the root (we have set it to NULL just before those steps).
Fix this by always doing a btrfs_put_root() call under the 'out' label. This is a problem that exists since qgroups were first added in 2012 by commit bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes"), but back then we missed a kfree on the quota root and free_extent_buffer() calls on its root and commit root nodes, since back then roots were not yet reference counted.(CVE-2024-41078)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/gt: Fix potential UAF by revoke of fence registers
CI has been sporadically reporting the following issue triggered by igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck on ADL-P and similar machines:
<6> [414.049203] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_evict_fence ... <6> [414.068804] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission enabled <6> [414.068812] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC enabled <3> [414.070354] Unable to pin Y-tiled fence; err:-4 <3> [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) ... <4>[ 609.603992] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 609.603995] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301! <4>[ 609.604003] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI <4>[ 609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G U W 6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1 <4>[ 609.604008] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023 <4>[ 609.604010] Workqueue: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915] <4>[ 609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915] ... <4>[ 609.604271] Call Trace: <4>[ 609.604273] <TASK> ... <4>[ 609.604716] __i915_vma_evict+0x2e9/0x550 [i915] <4>[ 609.604852] __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915] <4>[ 609.604977] force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605098] i915_vma_destroy+0x2f/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605210] __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605330] __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605440] process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690 ...
In the past, there were similar failures reported by CI from other IGT tests, observed on other platforms.
Before commit 63baf4f3d587 ("drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence"), i915_vma_revoke_fence() was waiting for idleness of vma->active via fence_update(). That commit introduced vma->fence->active in order for the fence_update() to be able to wait selectively on that one instead of vma->active since only idleness of fence registers was needed. But then, another commit 0d86ee35097a ("drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal") replaced the call to fence_update() in i915_vma_revoke_fence() with only fence_write(), and also added that GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) in front. No justification was provided on why we might then expect idleness of vma->fence->active without first waiting on it.
The issue can be potentially caused by a race among revocation of fence registers on one side and sequential execution of signal callbacks invoked on completion of a request that was using them on the other, still processed in parallel to revocation of those fence registers. Fix it by waiting for idleness of vma->fence->active in i915_vma_revoke_fence().
(cherry picked from commit 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1)(CVE-2024-41092)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/panel: ilitek-ili9881c: Fix warning with GPIO controllers that sleep
The ilitek-ili9881c controls the reset GPIO using the non-sleeping gpiod_set_value() function. This complains loudly when the GPIO controller needs to sleep. As the caller can sleep, use gpiod_set_value_cansleep() to fix the issue.(CVE-2024-42087)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: 8250_omap: Implementation of Errata i2310
As per Errata i2310[0], Erroneous timeout can be triggered, if this Erroneous interrupt is not cleared then it may leads to storm of interrupts, therefore apply Errata i2310 solution.
[0] https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprz536 page 23(CVE-2024-42095)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86: stop playing stack games in profile_pc()
The 'profile_pc()' function is used for timer-based profiling, which isn't really all that relevant any more to begin with, but it also ends up making assumptions based on the stack layout that aren't necessarily valid.
Basically, the code tries to account the time spent in spinlocks to the caller rather than the spinlock, and while I support that as a concept, it's not worth the code complexity or the KASAN warnings when no serious profiling is done using timers anyway these days.
And the code really does depend on stack layout that is only true in the simplest of cases. We've lost the comment at some point (I think when the 32-bit and 64-bit code was unified), but it used to say:
Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy
of eflags from PUSHF.
which explains why it just blindly loads a word or two straight off the stack pointer and then takes a minimal look at the values to just check if they might be eflags or the return pc:
Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses
but that basic stack layout assumption assumes that there isn't any lock debugging etc going on that would complicate the code and cause a stack frame.
It causes KASAN unhappiness reported for years by syzkaller [1] and others [2].
With no real practical reason for this any more, just remove the code.
Just for historical interest, here's some background commits relating to this code from 2006:
0cb91a229364 ("i386: Account spinlocks to the caller during profiling for !FP kernels") 31679f38d886 ("Simplify profile_pc on x86-64")
and a code unification from 2009:
ef4512882dbe ("x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc")
but the basics of this thing actually goes back to before the git tree.(CVE-2024-42096)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: ecdh - explicitly zeroize private_key
private_key is overwritten with the key parameter passed in by the caller (if present), or alternatively a newly generated private key. However, it is possible that the caller provides a key (or the newly generated key) which is shorter than the previous key. In that scenario, some key material from the previous key would not be overwritten. The easiest solution is to explicitly zeroize the entire private_key array first.
Note that this patch slightly changes the behavior of this function: previously, if the ecc_gen_privkey failed, the old private_key would remain. Now, the private_key is always zeroized. This behavior is consistent with the case where params.key is set and ecc_is_key_valid fails.(CVE-2024-42098)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again"
Patch series "mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling".
Dirty throttling logic assumes dirty limits in page units fit into 32-bits. This patch series makes sure this is true (see patch 2/2 for more details).
This patch (of 2):
This reverts commit 9319b647902cbd5cc884ac08a8a6d54ce111fc78.
The commit is broken in several ways. Firstly, the removed (u64) cast from the multiplication will introduce a multiplication overflow on 32-bit archs if wb_thresh * bg_thresh >= 1<<32 (which is actually common - the default settings with 4GB of RAM will trigger this). Secondly, the div64_u64() is unnecessarily expensive on 32-bit archs. We have div64_ul() in case we want to be safe & cheap. Thirdly, if dirty thresholds are larger than 1<<32 pages, then dirty balancing is going to blow up in many other spectacular ways anyway so trying to fix one possible overflow is just moot.(CVE-2024-42102)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix inode number range checks
Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes".
This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value.
This patch (of 3):
In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked.
As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly.
In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment.
Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros.
Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time.(CVE-2024-42105)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: restrict NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_QUANTUM values
syzbot is able to trigger softlockups, setting NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_QUANTUM to 2^31.
We had a similar issue in sch_fq, fixed with commit d9e15a273306 ("pkt_sched: fq: do not accept silly TCA_FQ_QUANTUM")
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 26s! [kworker/1:0:24] Modules linked in: irq event stamp: 131135 hardirqs last enabled at (131134): [<ffff80008ae8778c>] __exit_to_kernel_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:85 [inline] hardirqs last enabled at (131134): [<ffff80008ae8778c>] exit_to_kernel_mode+0xdc/0x10c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:95 hardirqs last disabled at (131135): [<ffff80008ae85378>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline] hardirqs last disabled at (131135): [<ffff80008ae85378>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551 softirqs last enabled at (125892): [<ffff80008907e82c>] neigh_hh_init net/core/neighbour.c:1538 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (125892): [<ffff80008907e82c>] neigh_resolve_output+0x268/0x658 net/core/neighbour.c:1553 softirqs last disabled at (125896): [<ffff80008904166c>] local_bh_disable+0x10/0x34 include/linux/bottom_half.h:19 CPU: 1 PID: 24 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-gfda5695d692c #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __list_del include/linux/list.h:195 [inline] pc : __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline] pc : list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline] pc : fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline] pc : ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x6b8/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854 lr : __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline] lr : list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline] lr : fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline] lr : ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x67c/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854 sp : ffff800093d36700 x29: ffff800093d36a60 x28: ffff800093d36960 x27: dfff800000000000 x26: ffff0000d800ad50 x25: ffff0000d800abe0 x24: ffff0000d800abf0 x23: ffff0000e0032468 x22: ffff0000e00324d4 x21: ffff0000d800abf0 x20: ffff0000d800abf8 x19: ffff0000d800abf0 x18: ffff800093d363c0 x17: 000000000000d476 x16: ffff8000805519dc x15: ffff7000127a6cc8 x14: 1ffff000127a6cc8 x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff7000127a6cc8 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : ffff80009287aa08 x4 : 0000000000000008 x3 : ffff80008034c7fc x2 : ffff0000e0032468 x1 : 00000000da0e46b8 x0 : ffff0000e0032470 Call trace: __list_del include/linux/list.h:195 [inline] __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline] list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline] fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline] ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x6b8/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854 wake_tx_push_queue net/mac80211/util.c:294 [inline] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue+0x118/0x274 net/mac80211/util.c:315 drv_wake_tx_queue net/mac80211/driver-ops.h:1350 [inline] schedule_and_wake_txq net/mac80211/driver-ops.h:1357 [inline] ieee80211_queue_skb+0x18e8/0x2244 net/mac80211/tx.c:1664 ieee80211_tx+0x260/0x400 net/mac80211/tx.c:1966 ieee80211_xmit+0x278/0x354 net/mac80211/tx.c:2062 __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0xab8/0x122c net/mac80211/tx.c:4338 ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0xe0/0x438 net/mac80211/tx.c:4532 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x27c/0x938 net/core/dev.c:3547 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1678/0x33fc net/core/dev.c:4341 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x558/0x658 net/core/neighbour.c:1563 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_fini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-42114)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
In this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register() so they are automatically unregistered after module's remove() is done. led_classdev_unregister() calls module's led_set_brightness() to turn off the LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already in module's remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
orangefs: fix out-of-bounds fsid access
Arnd Bergmann sent a patch to fsdevel, he says:
"orangefs_statfs() copies two consecutive fields of the superblock into the statfs structure, which triggers a warning from the string fortification helpers"
Jan Kara suggested an alternate way to do the patch to make it more readable.
I ran both ideas through xfstests and both seem fine. This patch is based on Jan Kara's suggestion.(CVE-2024-42143)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bnx2x: Fix multiple UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds
Fix UBSAN warnings that occur when using a system with 32 physical cpu cores or more, or when the user defines a number of Ethernet queues greater than or equal to FP_SB_MAX_E1x using the num_queues module parameter.
Currently there is a read/write out of bounds that occurs on the array "struct stats_query_entry query" present inside the "bnx2x_fw_stats_req" struct in "drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h". Looking at the definition of the "struct stats_query_entry query" array:
struct stats_query_entry query[FP_SB_MAX_E1x+ BNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX];
FP_SB_MAX_E1x is defined as the maximum number of fast path interrupts and has a value of 16, while BNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX has a value of 3 meaning the array has a total size of 19. Since accesses to "struct stats_query_entry query" are offset-ted by BNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX, that means that the total number of Ethernet queues should not exceed FP_SB_MAX_E1x (16). However one of these queues is reserved for FCOE and thus the number of Ethernet queues should be set to [FP_SB_MAX_E1x -1] (15) if FCOE is enabled or [FP_SB_MAX_E1x] (16) if it is not.
This is also described in a comment in the source code in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h just above the Macro definition of FP_SB_MAX_E1x. Below is the part of this explanation that it important for this patch
/ * The total number of L2 queues, MSIX vectors and HW contexts (CIDs) is * control by the number of fast-path status blocks supported by the * device (HW/FW). Each fast-path status block (FP-SB) aka non-default * status block represents an independent interrupts context that can * serve a regular L2 networking queue. However special L2 queues such * as the FCoE queue do not require a FP-SB and other components like * the CNIC may consume FP-SB reducing the number of possible L2 queues * * If the maximum number of FP-SB available is X then: * a. If CNIC is supported it consumes 1 FP-SB thus the max number of * regular L2 queues is Y=X-1 * b. In MF mode the actual number of L2 queues is Y= (X-1/MF_factor) * c. If the FCoE L2 queue is supported the actual number of L2 queues * is Y+1 * d. The number of irqs (MSIX vectors) is either Y+1 (one extra for * slow-path interrupts) or Y+2 if CNIC is supported (one additional * FP interrupt context for the CNIC). * e. The number of HW context (CID count) is always X or X+1 if FCoE * L2 queue is supported. The cid for the FCoE L2 queue is always X. /
However this driver also supports NICs that use the E2 controller which can handle more queues due to having more FP-SB represented by FP_SB_MAX_E2. Looking at the commits when the E2 support was added, it was originally using the E1x parameters: commit f2e0899f0f27 ("bnx2x: Add 57712 support"). Back then FP_SB_MAX_E2 was set to 16 the same as E1x. However the driver was later updated to take full advantage of the E2 instead of having it be limited to the capabilities of the E1x. But as far as we can tell, the array "stats_query_entry query" was still limited to using the FP-SB available to the E1x cards as part of an oversignt when the driver was updated to take full advantage of the E2, and now with the driver being aware of the greater queue size supported by E2 NICs, it causes the UBSAN warnings seen in the stack traces below.
This patch increases the size of the "stats_query_entry query" array by replacing FP_SB_MAX_E1x with FP_SB_MAX_E2 to be large enough to handle both types of NICs.
Stack traces:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_stats.c:1529:11 index 20 is out of range for type 'stats_query_entry [19]' CPU: 12 PID: 858 Comm: systemd-network Not tainted 6.9.0-060900rc7-generic #202405052133 Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-42148)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp_metrics: validate source addr length
I don't see anything checking that TCP_METRICS_ATTR_SADDR_IPV4 is at least 4 bytes long, and the policy doesn't have an entry for this attribute at all (neither does it for IPv6 but v6 is manually validated).(CVE-2024-42154)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe copies of clear-key structures on failure
Wipe all sensitive data from stack for all IOCTLs, which convert a clear-key into a protected- or secure-key.(CVE-2024-42156)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure
Wipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-frontends: tda10048: Fix integer overflow
state->xtal_hz can be up to 16M, so it can overflow a 32 bit integer when multiplied by pll_mfactor.
Create a new 64 bit variable to hold the calculations.(CVE-2024-42223)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mt76: replace skb_put with skb_put_zero
Avoid potentially reusing uninitialized data(CVE-2024-42225)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use
I.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding cryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer needed. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that previously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: mos7840: fix crash on resume
Since commit c49cfa917025 ("USB: serial: use generic method if no alternative is provided in usb serial layer"), USB serial core calls the generic resume implementation when the driver has not provided one.
This can trigger a crash on resume with mos7840 since support for multiple read URBs was added back in 2011. Specifically, both port read URBs are now submitted on resume for open ports, but the context pointer of the second URB is left set to the core rather than mos7840 port structure.
Fix this by implementing dedicated suspend and resume functions for mos7840.
Tested with Delock 87414 USB 2.0 to 4x serial adapter.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket
When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing the kernel to potentially freeze up.
Neil suggested:
This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.
ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().(CVE-2024-42246)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wireguard: allowedips: avoid unaligned 64-bit memory accesses
On the parisc platform, the kernel issues kernel warnings because swap_endian() tries to load a 128-bit IPv6 address from an unaligned memory location:
Kernel: unaligned access to 0x55f4688c in wg_allowedips_insert_v6+0x2c/0x80 [wireguard] (iir 0xf3010df) Kernel: unaligned access to 0x55f46884 in wg_allowedips_insert_v6+0x38/0x80 [wireguard] (iir 0xf2010dc)
Avoid such unaligned memory accesses by instead using the get_unaligned_be64() helper macro.
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.89.0.170.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: core: Make do_proc_control() and do_proc_bulk() killable\r\n\r\nThe USBDEVFS_CONTROL and USBDEVFS_BULK ioctls invoke\nusb_start_wait_urb(), which contains an uninterruptible wait with a\nuser-specified timeout value. If timeout value is very large and the\ndevice being accessed does not respond in a reasonable amount of time,\nthe kernel will complain about \u0026quot;Task X blocked for more than N\nseconds\u0026quot;, as found in testing by syzbot:\r\n\r\nINFO: task syz-executor.0:8700 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7-syzkaller #0\n\u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\ntask:syz-executor.0 state:D stack:23192 pid: 8700 ppid: 8455 flags:0x00004004\nCall Trace:\n context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4681 [inline]\n __schedule+0xc07/0x11f0 kernel/sched/core.c:5938\n schedule+0x14b/0x210 kernel/sched/core.c:6017\n schedule_timeout+0x98/0x2f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1857\n do_wait_for_common+0x2da/0x480 kernel/sched/completion.c:85\n __wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:106 [inline]\n wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:117 [inline]\n wait_for_completion_timeout+0x46/0x60 kernel/sched/completion.c:157\n usb_start_wait_urb+0x167/0x550 drivers/usb/core/message.c:63\n do_proc_bulk+0x978/0x1080 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1236\n proc_bulk drivers/usb/core/devio.c:1273 [inline]\n usbdev_do_ioctl drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2547 [inline]\n usbdev_ioctl+0x3441/0x6b10 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2713\n...\r\n\r\nTo fix this problem, this patch replaces usbfs\u0026apos;s calls to\nusb_control_msg() and usb_bulk_msg() with special-purpose code that\ndoes essentially the same thing (as recommended in the comment for\nusb_start_wait_urb()), except that it always uses a killable wait and\nit uses GFP_KERNEL rather than GFP_NOIO.(CVE-2021-47582)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX\r\n\r\nDan Aloni reports:\n\u0026gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (\u0026quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to\n\u0026gt; the RPC read layers\u0026quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up\n\u0026gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.\n\u0026gt;\n\u0026gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size\n\u0026gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset\n\u0026gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server\n\u0026gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as\n\u0026gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.\r\n\r\nThe Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all\nNFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a\nREAD.\r\n\r\nInstead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed\nand return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent\nthe client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to\nbe consistent with Solaris NFS servers.\r\n\r\nNote that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These\nmust be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit\ntype cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks\nagainst sb-\u0026gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Only free buffer VA that is not NULL\r\n\r\nIn the MediaTek vcodec driver, while mtk_vcodec_mem_free() is mostly\ncalled only when the buffer to free exists, there are some instances\nthat didn\u0026apos;t do the check and triggered warnings in practice.\r\n\r\nWe believe those checks were forgotten unintentionally. Add the checks\nback to fix the warnings.(CVE-2023-52888)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nHID: core: remove unnecessary WARN_ON() in implement()\r\n\r\nSyzkaller hit a warning [1] in a call to implement() when trying\nto write a value into a field of smaller size in an output report.\r\n\r\nSince implement() already has a warn message printed out with the\nhelp of hid_warn() and value in question gets trimmed with:\n\t...\n\tvalue \u0026amp;= m;\n\t...\nWARN_ON may be considered superfluous. Remove it to suppress future\nsyzkaller triggers.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5084 at drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 implement drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 [inline]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5084 at drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 hid_output_report+0x548/0x760 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1863\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor424 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00183-gcf87f46fd34d #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nRIP: 0010:implement drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1451 [inline]\nRIP: 0010:hid_output_report+0x548/0x760 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1863\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __usbhid_submit_report drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:591 [inline]\n usbhid_submit_report+0x43d/0x9e0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:636\n hiddev_ioctl+0x138b/0x1f00 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:726\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n...(CVE-2024-39509)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: mesh: Fix leak of mesh_preq_queue objects\r\n\r\nThe hwmp code use objects of type mesh_preq_queue, added to a list in\nieee80211_if_mesh, to keep track of mpath we need to resolve. If the mpath\ngets deleted, ex mesh interface is removed, the entries in that list will\nnever get cleaned. Fix this by flushing all corresponding items of the\npreq_queue in mesh_path_flush_pending().\r\n\r\nThis should take care of KASAN reports like this:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff00000668d800 (size 128):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/u8:4\u0026quot;, pid 67, jiffies 4295419552 (age 1836.444s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 1f 05 09 00 00 ff ff 00 d5 68 06 00 00 ff ff ..........h.....\n 8e 97 ea eb 3e b8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....\u0026gt;...........\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000007302a0b6\u0026gt;] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e0/0x35c\n [\u0026lt;00000000049bd418\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x34/0x80\n [\u0026lt;0000000000d792bb\u0026gt;] mesh_queue_preq+0x44/0x2a8\n [\u0026lt;00000000c99c3696\u0026gt;] mesh_nexthop_resolve+0x198/0x19c\n [\u0026lt;00000000926bf598\u0026gt;] ieee80211_xmit+0x1d0/0x1f4\n [\u0026lt;00000000fc8c2284\u0026gt;] __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x30c/0x764\n [\u0026lt;000000005926ee38\u0026gt;] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x9c/0x7a4\n [\u0026lt;000000004c86e916\u0026gt;] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x174/0x440\n [\u0026lt;0000000023495647\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0xe24/0x111c\n [\u0026lt;00000000cfe9ca78\u0026gt;] batadv_send_skb_packet+0x180/0x1e4\n [\u0026lt;000000007bacc5d5\u0026gt;] batadv_v_elp_periodic_work+0x2f4/0x508\n [\u0026lt;00000000adc3cd94\u0026gt;] process_one_work+0x4b8/0xa1c\n [\u0026lt;00000000b36425d1\u0026gt;] worker_thread+0x9c/0x634\n [\u0026lt;0000000005852dd5\u0026gt;] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c4\n [\u0026lt;000000005fccd770\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\nunreferenced object 0xffff000009051f00 (size 128):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/u8:4\u0026quot;, pid 67, jiffies 4295419553 (age 1836.440s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 90 d6 92 0d 00 00 ff ff 00 d8 68 06 00 00 ff ff ..........h.....\n 36 27 92 e4 02 e0 01 00 00 58 79 06 00 00 ff ff 6\u0026apos;.......Xy.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000007302a0b6\u0026gt;] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e0/0x35c\n [\u0026lt;00000000049bd418\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x34/0x80\n [\u0026lt;0000000000d792bb\u0026gt;] mesh_queue_preq+0x44/0x2a8\n [\u0026lt;00000000c99c3696\u0026gt;] mesh_nexthop_resolve+0x198/0x19c\n [\u0026lt;00000000926bf598\u0026gt;] ieee80211_xmit+0x1d0/0x1f4\n [\u0026lt;00000000fc8c2284\u0026gt;] __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x30c/0x764\n [\u0026lt;000000005926ee38\u0026gt;] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x9c/0x7a4\n [\u0026lt;000000004c86e916\u0026gt;] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x174/0x440\n [\u0026lt;0000000023495647\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0xe24/0x111c\n [\u0026lt;00000000cfe9ca78\u0026gt;] batadv_send_skb_packet+0x180/0x1e4\n [\u0026lt;000000007bacc5d5\u0026gt;] batadv_v_elp_periodic_work+0x2f4/0x508\n [\u0026lt;00000000adc3cd94\u0026gt;] process_one_work+0x4b8/0xa1c\n [\u0026lt;00000000b36425d1\u0026gt;] worker_thread+0x9c/0x634\n [\u0026lt;0000000005852dd5\u0026gt;] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c4\n [\u0026lt;000000005fccd770\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-40942)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/mlx5: Add check for srq max_sge attribute\r\n\r\nmax_sge attribute is passed by the user, and is inserted and used\nunchecked, so verify that the value doesn\u0026apos;t exceed maximum allowed value\nbefore using it.(CVE-2024-40990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfilelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected\r\n\r\nWhen fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with\ndo_lock_file_wait().\nHowever, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock\nwhile denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock.\nSeparately, posix_lock_file() could also fail to\nremove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range\nin the middle).\r\n\r\nAfter the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in\nlock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used\nto read arbitrary kernel memory, but can\u0026apos;t corrupt kernel memory.\r\n\r\nFix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to\nreliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and\nfiles_struct and is also used by filp_flush().(CVE-2024-41012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix kernel bug on rename operation of broken directory\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported that in rename directory operation on broken directory on\nnilfs2, __block_write_begin_int() called to prepare block write may fail\nBUG_ON check for access exceeding the folio/page size.\r\n\r\nThis is because nilfs_dotdot(), which gets parent directory reference\nentry (\u0026quot;..\u0026quot;) of the directory to be moved or renamed, does not check\nconsistency enough, and may return location exceeding folio/page size for\nbroken directories.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by checking required directory entries (\u0026quot;.\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;..\u0026quot;) in\nthe first chunk of the directory in nilfs_dotdot().(CVE-2024-41034)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: core: Fix duplicate endpoint bug by clearing reserved bits in the descriptor\r\n\r\nSyzbot has identified a bug in usbcore (see the Closes: tag below)\ncaused by our assumption that the reserved bits in an endpoint\ndescriptor\u0026apos;s bEndpointAddress field will always be 0. As a result of\nthe bug, the endpoint_is_duplicate() routine in config.c (and possibly\nother routines as well) may believe that two descriptors are for\ndistinct endpoints, even though they have the same direction and\nendpoint number. This can lead to confusion, including the bug\nidentified by syzbot (two descriptors with matching endpoint numbers\nand directions, where one was interrupt and the other was bulk).\r\n\r\nTo fix the bug, we will clear the reserved bits in bEndpointAddress\nwhen we parse the descriptor. (Note that both the USB-2.0 and USB-3.1\nspecs say these bits are \u0026quot;Reserved, reset to zero\u0026quot;.) This requires us\nto make a copy of the descriptor earlier in usb_parse_endpoint() and\nuse the copy instead of the original when checking for duplicates.(CVE-2024-41035)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_chain_validate\r\n\r\nnft_chain_validate already performs loop detection because a cycle will\nresult in a call stack overflow (ctx-\u0026gt;level \u0026gt;= NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE).\r\n\r\nIt also follows maps via -\u0026gt;validate callback in nft_lookup, so there\nappears no reason to iterate the maps again.\r\n\r\nnf_tables_check_loops() and all its helper functions can be removed.\nThis improves ruleset load time significantly, from 23s down to 12s.\r\n\r\nThis also fixes a crash bug. Old loop detection code can result in\nunbounded recursion:\r\n\r\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ....\nOops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN\nCPU: 4 PID: 1539 Comm: nft Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5+ #1\n[..]\r\n\r\nwith a suitable ruleset during validation of register stores.\r\n\r\nI can\u0026apos;t see any actual reason to attempt to check for this from\nnft_validate_register_store(), at this point the transaction is still in\nprogress, so we don\u0026apos;t have a full picture of the rule graph.\r\n\r\nFor nf-next it might make sense to either remove it or make this depend\non table-\u0026gt;validate_state in case we could catch an error earlier\n(for improved error reporting to userspace).(CVE-2024-41042)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ethernet: lantiq_etop: fix double free in detach\r\n\r\nThe number of the currently released descriptor is never incremented\nwhich results in the same skb being released multiple times.(CVE-2024-41046)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/pseries: Whitelist dtl slub object for copying to userspace\r\n\r\nReading the dispatch trace log from /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/dtl/cpu-*\nresults in a BUG() when the config CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled as\nshown below.\r\n\r\n kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!\n Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]\n LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries\n Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c dm_service_time sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvfc\n scsi_transport_fc ibmveth pseries_wdt dm_multipath dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse\n CPU: 27 PID: 1815 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3 #85\n Hardware name: IBM,9040-MRX POWER10 (raw) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NM1060_042) hv:phyp pSeries\n NIP: c0000000005d23d4 LR: c0000000005d23d0 CTR: 00000000006ee6f8\n REGS: c000000120c078c0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.10.0-rc3)\n MSR: 8000000000029033 \u0026lt;SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE\u0026gt; CR: 2828220f XER: 0000000e\n CFAR: c0000000001fdc80 IRQMASK: 0\n [ ... GPRs omitted ... ]\n NIP [c0000000005d23d4] usercopy_abort+0x78/0xb0\n LR [c0000000005d23d0] usercopy_abort+0x74/0xb0\n Call Trace:\n usercopy_abort+0x74/0xb0 (unreliable)\n __check_heap_object+0xf8/0x120\n check_heap_object+0x218/0x240\n __check_object_size+0x84/0x1a4\n dtl_file_read+0x17c/0x2c4\n full_proxy_read+0x8c/0x110\n vfs_read+0xdc/0x3a0\n ksys_read+0x84/0x144\n system_call_exception+0x124/0x330\n system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec\n --- interrupt: 3000 at 0x7fff81f3ab34\r\n\r\nCommit 6d07d1cd300f (\u0026quot;usercopy: Restrict non-usercopy caches to size 0\u0026quot;)\nrequires that only whitelisted areas in slab/slub objects can be copied to\nuserspace when usercopy hardening is enabled using CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY.\nDtl contains hypervisor dispatch events which are expected to be read by\nprivileged users. Hence mark this safe for user access.\nSpecify useroffset=0 and usersize=DISPATCH_LOG_BYTES to whitelist the\nentire object.(CVE-2024-41065)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: qgroup: fix quota root leak after quota disable failure\r\n\r\nIf during the quota disable we fail when cleaning the quota tree or when\ndeleting the root from the root tree, we jump to the \u0026apos;out\u0026apos; label without\never dropping the reference on the quota root, resulting in a leak of the\nroot since fs_info-\u0026gt;quota_root is no longer pointing to the root (we have\nset it to NULL just before those steps).\r\n\r\nFix this by always doing a btrfs_put_root() call under the \u0026apos;out\u0026apos; label.\nThis is a problem that exists since qgroups were first added in 2012 by\ncommit bed92eae26cc (\u0026quot;Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes\u0026quot;), but\nback then we missed a kfree on the quota root and free_extent_buffer()\ncalls on its root and commit root nodes, since back then roots were not\nyet reference counted.(CVE-2024-41078)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/i915/gt: Fix potential UAF by revoke of fence registers\r\n\r\nCI has been sporadically reporting the following issue triggered by\nigt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck on ADL-P and similar machines:\r\n\r\n\u0026lt;6\u0026gt; [414.049203] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_evict_fence\n...\n\u0026lt;6\u0026gt; [414.068804] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission enabled\n\u0026lt;6\u0026gt; [414.068812] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC enabled\n\u0026lt;3\u0026gt; [414.070354] Unable to pin Y-tiled fence; err:-4\n\u0026lt;3\u0026gt; [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026amp;fence-\u0026gt;active))\n...\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.603992] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n\u0026lt;2\u0026gt;[ 609.603995] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301!\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604003] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G U W 6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604008] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604010] Workqueue: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915]\n...\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604271] Call Trace:\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604273] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n...\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604716] __i915_vma_evict+0x2e9/0x550 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604852] __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.604977] force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605098] i915_vma_destroy+0x2f/0xa0 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605210] __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605330] __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915]\n\u0026lt;4\u0026gt;[ 609.605440] process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690\n...\r\n\r\nIn the past, there were similar failures reported by CI from other IGT\ntests, observed on other platforms.\r\n\r\nBefore commit 63baf4f3d587 (\u0026quot;drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity\nbefore unbinding a GGTT fence\u0026quot;), i915_vma_revoke_fence() was waiting for\nidleness of vma-\u0026gt;active via fence_update(). That commit introduced\nvma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active in order for the fence_update() to be able to wait\nselectively on that one instead of vma-\u0026gt;active since only idleness of\nfence registers was needed. But then, another commit 0d86ee35097a\n(\u0026quot;drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal\u0026quot;) replaced the call to\nfence_update() in i915_vma_revoke_fence() with only fence_write(), and\nalso added that GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(\u0026amp;fence-\u0026gt;active)) in front.\nNo justification was provided on why we might then expect idleness of\nvma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active without first waiting on it.\r\n\r\nThe issue can be potentially caused by a race among revocation of fence\nregisters on one side and sequential execution of signal callbacks invoked\non completion of a request that was using them on the other, still\nprocessed in parallel to revocation of those fence registers. Fix it by\nwaiting for idleness of vma-\u0026gt;fence-\u0026gt;active in i915_vma_revoke_fence().\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1)(CVE-2024-41092)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/panel: ilitek-ili9881c: Fix warning with GPIO controllers that sleep\r\n\r\nThe ilitek-ili9881c controls the reset GPIO using the non-sleeping\ngpiod_set_value() function. This complains loudly when the GPIO\ncontroller needs to sleep. As the caller can sleep, use\ngpiod_set_value_cansleep() to fix the issue.(CVE-2024-42087)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: 8250_omap: Implementation of Errata i2310\r\n\r\nAs per Errata i2310[0], Erroneous timeout can be triggered,\nif this Erroneous interrupt is not cleared then it may leads\nto storm of interrupts, therefore apply Errata i2310 solution.\r\n\r\n[0] https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprz536 page 23(CVE-2024-42095)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nx86: stop playing stack games in profile_pc()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026apos;profile_pc()\u0026apos; function is used for timer-based profiling, which\nisn\u0026apos;t really all that relevant any more to begin with, but it also ends\nup making assumptions based on the stack layout that aren\u0026apos;t necessarily\nvalid.\r\n\r\nBasically, the code tries to account the time spent in spinlocks to the\ncaller rather than the spinlock, and while I support that as a concept,\nit\u0026apos;s not worth the code complexity or the KASAN warnings when no serious\nprofiling is done using timers anyway these days.\r\n\r\nAnd the code really does depend on stack layout that is only true in the\nsimplest of cases. We\u0026apos;ve lost the comment at some point (I think when\nthe 32-bit and 64-bit code was unified), but it used to say:\r\n\r\n\tAssume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy\n\tof eflags from PUSHF.\r\n\r\nwhich explains why it just blindly loads a word or two straight off the\nstack pointer and then takes a minimal look at the values to just check\nif they might be eflags or the return pc:\r\n\r\n\tEflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses\r\n\r\nbut that basic stack layout assumption assumes that there isn\u0026apos;t any lock\ndebugging etc going on that would complicate the code and cause a stack\nframe.\r\n\r\nIt causes KASAN unhappiness reported for years by syzkaller [1] and\nothers [2].\r\n\r\nWith no real practical reason for this any more, just remove the code.\r\n\r\nJust for historical interest, here\u0026apos;s some background commits relating to\nthis code from 2006:\r\n\r\n 0cb91a229364 (\u0026quot;i386: Account spinlocks to the caller during profiling for !FP kernels\u0026quot;)\n 31679f38d886 (\u0026quot;Simplify profile_pc on x86-64\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nand a code unification from 2009:\r\n\r\n ef4512882dbe (\u0026quot;x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nbut the basics of this thing actually goes back to before the git tree.(CVE-2024-42096)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: ecdh - explicitly zeroize private_key\r\n\r\nprivate_key is overwritten with the key parameter passed in by the\ncaller (if present), or alternatively a newly generated private key.\nHowever, it is possible that the caller provides a key (or the newly\ngenerated key) which is shorter than the previous key. In that\nscenario, some key material from the previous key would not be\noverwritten. The easiest solution is to explicitly zeroize the entire\nprivate_key array first.\r\n\r\nNote that this patch slightly changes the behavior of this function:\npreviously, if the ecc_gen_privkey failed, the old private_key would\nremain. Now, the private_key is always zeroized. This behavior is\nconsistent with the case where params.key is set and ecc_is_key_valid\nfails.(CVE-2024-42098)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRevert \u0026quot;mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nDirty throttling logic assumes dirty limits in page units fit into\n32-bits. This patch series makes sure this is true (see patch 2/2 for\nmore details).\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 2):\r\n\r\nThis reverts commit 9319b647902cbd5cc884ac08a8a6d54ce111fc78.\r\n\r\nThe commit is broken in several ways. Firstly, the removed (u64) cast\nfrom the multiplication will introduce a multiplication overflow on 32-bit\narchs if wb_thresh * bg_thresh \u0026gt;= 1\u0026lt;\u0026lt;32 (which is actually common - the\ndefault settings with 4GB of RAM will trigger this). Secondly, the\ndiv64_u64() is unnecessarily expensive on 32-bit archs. We have\ndiv64_ul() in case we want to be safe \u0026amp; cheap. Thirdly, if dirty\nthresholds are larger than 1\u0026lt;\u0026lt;32 pages, then dirty balancing is going to\nblow up in many other spectacular ways anyway so trying to fix one\npossible overflow is just moot.(CVE-2024-42102)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix inode number range checks\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nThis series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by\nnilfs2\u0026apos;s internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted\nfilesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting\nnumber of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is\nintentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. \r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nIn the current implementation of nilfs2, \u0026quot;nilfs-\u0026gt;ns_first_ino\u0026quot;, which\ngives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock,\nbut its lower limit is not checked.\r\n\r\nAs a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of\nreserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the\nsuper block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and\nNILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly.\r\n\r\nIn addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with\nthe inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a\nshift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in\nthe C specification, so if \u0026quot;ns_first_ino\u0026quot; is set to a large value other\nthan the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially\nmalfunction depending on the environment.\r\n\r\nFix these issues by checking the lower bound of \u0026quot;nilfs-\u0026gt;ns_first_ino\u0026quot; and\nby preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO\nconstant in the inode number test macros.\r\n\r\nAlso, change the type of \u0026quot;ns_first_ino\u0026quot; from signed integer to unsigned\ninteger to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the\nlower bound check introduced this time.(CVE-2024-42105)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: restrict NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_QUANTUM values\r\n\r\nsyzbot is able to trigger softlockups, setting NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_QUANTUM\nto 2^31.\r\n\r\nWe had a similar issue in sch_fq, fixed with commit\nd9e15a273306 (\u0026quot;pkt_sched: fq: do not accept silly TCA_FQ_QUANTUM\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nwatchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 26s! [kworker/1:0:24]\nModules linked in:\nirq event stamp: 131135\n hardirqs last enabled at (131134): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ae8778c\u0026gt;] __exit_to_kernel_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:85 [inline]\n hardirqs last enabled at (131134): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ae8778c\u0026gt;] exit_to_kernel_mode+0xdc/0x10c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:95\n hardirqs last disabled at (131135): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ae85378\u0026gt;] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline]\n hardirqs last disabled at (131135): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ae85378\u0026gt;] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551\n softirqs last enabled at (125892): [\u0026lt;ffff80008907e82c\u0026gt;] neigh_hh_init net/core/neighbour.c:1538 [inline]\n softirqs last enabled at (125892): [\u0026lt;ffff80008907e82c\u0026gt;] neigh_resolve_output+0x268/0x658 net/core/neighbour.c:1553\n softirqs last disabled at (125896): [\u0026lt;ffff80008904166c\u0026gt;] local_bh_disable+0x10/0x34 include/linux/bottom_half.h:19\nCPU: 1 PID: 24 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-gfda5695d692c #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nWorkqueue: mld mld_ifc_work\npstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : __list_del include/linux/list.h:195 [inline]\n pc : __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline]\n pc : list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline]\n pc : fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline]\n pc : ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x6b8/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854\n lr : __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline]\n lr : list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline]\n lr : fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline]\n lr : ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x67c/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854\nsp : ffff800093d36700\nx29: ffff800093d36a60 x28: ffff800093d36960 x27: dfff800000000000\nx26: ffff0000d800ad50 x25: ffff0000d800abe0 x24: ffff0000d800abf0\nx23: ffff0000e0032468 x22: ffff0000e00324d4 x21: ffff0000d800abf0\nx20: ffff0000d800abf8 x19: ffff0000d800abf0 x18: ffff800093d363c0\nx17: 000000000000d476 x16: ffff8000805519dc x15: ffff7000127a6cc8\nx14: 1ffff000127a6cc8 x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff\nx11: ffff7000127a6cc8 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 0000000000000000\nx8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000\nx5 : ffff80009287aa08 x4 : 0000000000000008 x3 : ffff80008034c7fc\nx2 : ffff0000e0032468 x1 : 00000000da0e46b8 x0 : ffff0000e0032470\nCall trace:\n __list_del include/linux/list.h:195 [inline]\n __list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:218 [inline]\n list_move_tail include/linux/list.h:310 [inline]\n fq_tin_dequeue include/net/fq_impl.h:112 [inline]\n ieee80211_tx_dequeue+0x6b8/0x3b4c net/mac80211/tx.c:3854\n wake_tx_push_queue net/mac80211/util.c:294 [inline]\n ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue+0x118/0x274 net/mac80211/util.c:315\n drv_wake_tx_queue net/mac80211/driver-ops.h:1350 [inline]\n schedule_and_wake_txq net/mac80211/driver-ops.h:1357 [inline]\n ieee80211_queue_skb+0x18e8/0x2244 net/mac80211/tx.c:1664\n ieee80211_tx+0x260/0x400 net/mac80211/tx.c:1966\n ieee80211_xmit+0x278/0x354 net/mac80211/tx.c:2062\n __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0xab8/0x122c net/mac80211/tx.c:4338\n ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0xe0/0x438 net/mac80211/tx.c:4532\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x27c/0x938 net/core/dev.c:3547\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x1678/0x33fc net/core/dev.c:4341\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline]\n neigh_resolve_output+0x558/0x658 net/core/neighbour.c:1563\n neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline]\n ip6_fini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-42114)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization\r\n\r\nIn this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register()\nso they are automatically unregistered after module\u0026apos;s remove() is done.\nled_classdev_unregister() calls module\u0026apos;s led_set_brightness() to turn off\nthe LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already\nin module\u0026apos;s remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\norangefs: fix out-of-bounds fsid access\r\n\r\nArnd Bergmann sent a patch to fsdevel, he says:\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;orangefs_statfs() copies two consecutive fields of the superblock into\nthe statfs structure, which triggers a warning from the string fortification\nhelpers\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nJan Kara suggested an alternate way to do the patch to make it more readable.\r\n\r\nI ran both ideas through xfstests and both seem fine. This patch\nis based on Jan Kara\u0026apos;s suggestion.(CVE-2024-42143)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbnx2x: Fix multiple UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds\r\n\r\nFix UBSAN warnings that occur when using a system with 32 physical\ncpu cores or more, or when the user defines a number of Ethernet\nqueues greater than or equal to FP_SB_MAX_E1x using the num_queues\nmodule parameter.\r\n\r\nCurrently there is a read/write out of bounds that occurs on the array\n\u0026quot;struct stats_query_entry query\u0026quot; present inside the \u0026quot;bnx2x_fw_stats_req\u0026quot;\nstruct in \u0026quot;drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h\u0026quot;.\nLooking at the definition of the \u0026quot;struct stats_query_entry query\u0026quot; array:\r\n\r\nstruct stats_query_entry query[FP_SB_MAX_E1x+\n BNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX];\r\n\r\nFP_SB_MAX_E1x is defined as the maximum number of fast path interrupts and\nhas a value of 16, while BNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX has a value of 3\nmeaning the array has a total size of 19.\nSince accesses to \u0026quot;struct stats_query_entry query\u0026quot; are offset-ted by\nBNX2X_FIRST_QUEUE_QUERY_IDX, that means that the total number of Ethernet\nqueues should not exceed FP_SB_MAX_E1x (16). However one of these queues\nis reserved for FCOE and thus the number of Ethernet queues should be set\nto [FP_SB_MAX_E1x -1] (15) if FCOE is enabled or [FP_SB_MAX_E1x] (16) if\nit is not.\r\n\r\nThis is also described in a comment in the source code in\ndrivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h just above the Macro definition\nof FP_SB_MAX_E1x. Below is the part of this explanation that it important\nfor this patch\r\n\r\n/*\n * The total number of L2 queues, MSIX vectors and HW contexts (CIDs) is\n * control by the number of fast-path status blocks supported by the\n * device (HW/FW). Each fast-path status block (FP-SB) aka non-default\n * status block represents an independent interrupts context that can\n * serve a regular L2 networking queue. However special L2 queues such\n * as the FCoE queue do not require a FP-SB and other components like\n * the CNIC may consume FP-SB reducing the number of possible L2 queues\n *\n * If the maximum number of FP-SB available is X then:\n * a. If CNIC is supported it consumes 1 FP-SB thus the max number of\n * regular L2 queues is Y=X-1\n * b. In MF mode the actual number of L2 queues is Y= (X-1/MF_factor)\n * c. If the FCoE L2 queue is supported the actual number of L2 queues\n * is Y+1\n * d. The number of irqs (MSIX vectors) is either Y+1 (one extra for\n * slow-path interrupts) or Y+2 if CNIC is supported (one additional\n * FP interrupt context for the CNIC).\n * e. The number of HW context (CID count) is always X or X+1 if FCoE\n * L2 queue is supported. The cid for the FCoE L2 queue is always X.\n */\r\n\r\nHowever this driver also supports NICs that use the E2 controller which can\nhandle more queues due to having more FP-SB represented by FP_SB_MAX_E2.\nLooking at the commits when the E2 support was added, it was originally\nusing the E1x parameters: commit f2e0899f0f27 (\u0026quot;bnx2x: Add 57712 support\u0026quot;).\nBack then FP_SB_MAX_E2 was set to 16 the same as E1x. However the driver\nwas later updated to take full advantage of the E2 instead of having it be\nlimited to the capabilities of the E1x. But as far as we can tell, the\narray \u0026quot;stats_query_entry query\u0026quot; was still limited to using the FP-SB\navailable to the E1x cards as part of an oversignt when the driver was\nupdated to take full advantage of the E2, and now with the driver being\naware of the greater queue size supported by E2 NICs, it causes the UBSAN\nwarnings seen in the stack traces below.\r\n\r\nThis patch increases the size of the \u0026quot;stats_query_entry query\u0026quot; array by\nreplacing FP_SB_MAX_E1x with FP_SB_MAX_E2 to be large enough to handle\nboth types of NICs.\r\n\r\nStack traces:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in\n drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_stats.c:1529:11\nindex 20 is out of range for type \u0026apos;stats_query_entry [19]\u0026apos;\nCPU: 12 PID: 858 Comm: systemd-network Not tainted 6.9.0-060900rc7-generic\n\t #202405052133\nHardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-42148)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp_metrics: validate source addr length\r\n\r\nI don\u0026apos;t see anything checking that TCP_METRICS_ATTR_SADDR_IPV4\nis at least 4 bytes long, and the policy doesn\u0026apos;t have an entry\nfor this attribute at all (neither does it for IPv6 but v6 is\nmanually validated).(CVE-2024-42154)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe copies of clear-key structures on failure\r\n\r\nWipe all sensitive data from stack for all IOCTLs, which convert a\nclear-key into a protected- or secure-key.(CVE-2024-42156)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure\r\n\r\nWipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: dvb-frontends: tda10048: Fix integer overflow\r\n\r\nstate-\u0026gt;xtal_hz can be up to 16M, so it can overflow a 32 bit integer\nwhen multiplied by pll_mfactor.\r\n\r\nCreate a new 64 bit variable to hold the calculations.(CVE-2024-42223)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mt76: replace skb_put with skb_put_zero\r\n\r\nAvoid potentially reusing uninitialized data(CVE-2024-42225)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use\r\n\r\nI.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding\ncryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer\nneeded. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that\npreviously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: serial: mos7840: fix crash on resume\r\n\r\nSince commit c49cfa917025 (\u0026quot;USB: serial: use generic method if no\nalternative is provided in usb serial layer\u0026quot;), USB serial core calls the\ngeneric resume implementation when the driver has not provided one.\r\n\r\nThis can trigger a crash on resume with mos7840 since support for\nmultiple read URBs was added back in 2011. Specifically, both port read\nURBs are now submitted on resume for open ports, but the context pointer\nof the second URB is left set to the core rather than mos7840 port\nstructure.\r\n\r\nFix this by implementing dedicated suspend and resume functions for\nmos7840.\r\n\r\nTested with Delock 87414 USB 2.0 to 4x serial adapter.\r\n\r\n[ johan: analyse crash and rewrite commit message; set busy flag on\n resume; drop bulk-in check; drop unnecessary usb_kill_urb() ](CVE-2024-42244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket\r\n\r\nWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This\ncauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing\nthe kernel to potentially freeze up.\r\n\r\nNeil suggested:\r\n\r\n This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready\n to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more\n likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.\r\n\r\nECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error\ncan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels\nwhich do not have f10d05966196 (\u0026quot;bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err\ninstead of allow boolean\u0026quot;), thus given that it is better to simply remap for\nconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().(CVE-2024-42246)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwireguard: allowedips: avoid unaligned 64-bit memory accesses\r\n\r\nOn the parisc platform, the kernel issues kernel warnings because\nswap_endian() tries to load a 128-bit IPv6 address from an unaligned\nmemory location:\r\n\r\n Kernel: unaligned access to 0x55f4688c in wg_allowedips_insert_v6+0x2c/0x80 [wireguard] (iir 0xf3010df)\n Kernel: unaligned access to 0x55f46884 in wg_allowedips_insert_v6+0x38/0x80 [wireguard] (iir 0xf2010dc)\r\n\r\nAvoid such unaligned memory accesses by instead using the\nget_unaligned_be64() helper macro.\r\n\r\n[Jason: replace src[8] in original patch with src+8](CVE-2024-42247)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1992",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:27Z",
"published": "2024-08-16T11:07:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1992"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42156"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42247"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47582",
"CVE-2022-48827",
"CVE-2023-52888",
"CVE-2024-39509",
"CVE-2024-40942",
"CVE-2024-40990",
"CVE-2024-41012",
"CVE-2024-41034",
"CVE-2024-41035",
"CVE-2024-41042",
"CVE-2024-41046",
"CVE-2024-41065",
"CVE-2024-41078",
"CVE-2024-41092",
"CVE-2024-42087",
"CVE-2024-42095",
"CVE-2024-42096",
"CVE-2024-42098",
"CVE-2024-42102",
"CVE-2024-42105",
"CVE-2024-42114",
"CVE-2024-42128",
"CVE-2024-42143",
"CVE-2024-42148",
"CVE-2024-42154",
"CVE-2024-42156",
"CVE-2024-42157",
"CVE-2024-42223",
"CVE-2024-42225",
"CVE-2024-42229",
"CVE-2024-42244",
"CVE-2024-42246",
"CVE-2024-42247"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.