cve-2022-39241
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-11-02 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 12:00
Summary
Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:00:43.541Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-rcc5-28r3-23rr"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "discourse",
          "vendor": "discourse",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 2.8.9"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 2.9.0.beta10"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.6,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-11-02T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-rcc5-28r3-23rr"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-rcc5-28r3-23rr",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Possible Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in webhooks"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-39241",
    "datePublished": "2022-11-02T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2022-09-02T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:00:43.541Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-39241\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2022-11-02T17:15:17.187\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:17:51.443\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Discourse es una plataforma para la discusi\u00f3n comunitaria. Un administrador malintencionado podr\u00eda utilizar esta vulnerabilidad para realizar una enumeraci\u00f3n de puertos en el host local u otros hosts de la red interna, as\u00ed como contra hosts de Internet. Las \u00faltimas versiones \\\"stable\\\", \\\"beta\\\" y `test-passed` ahora est\u00e1n parcheadas. Como workaround, los autohospedadores pueden usar la var de entorno `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` (que anula la configuraci\u00f3n `blocked_ip_blocks`) para impedir que los webhooks accedan a IP privadas.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.3,\"impactScore\":4.7},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-918\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.8.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6B12D112-6E19-48E4-92C4-0719F6719929\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B3803EF9-A296-42B7-887F-93C5E68E94C4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta10:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"35BAC488-3622-4B0B-B8EA-879E8C68E8CF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8BA3D313-3C11-43E2-A47D-CBB532D1B6F8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6F42673E-65F3-4807-9484-20CB747420FB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0B91D023-FCE5-4866-AD8B-BBB675763104\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta5:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0086484D-0164-449C-8AAE-BE7479CB9706\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta6:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F9D1B031-96C7-44C0-A0A0-F67ABE55C93C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta7:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"750D2AD9-35E7-4AC7-9C22-AA90DAA34F3F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta8:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B68E308A-BDAB-4614-A563-4460F7996CBE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse:2.9.0:beta9:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5DEDE4C5-2C2A-4B74-BB41-8AAA0EE636E2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-rcc5-28r3-23rr\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-rcc5-28r3-23rr\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.