CVE-2022-3555 (GCVE-0-2022-3555)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: – Updated: 2022-11-02 00:00
VLAI?

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
        "shortName": "VulDB"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
    "assignerShortName": "VulDB",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-3555",
    "dateRejected": "2022-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-10-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2022-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2022-3555",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T03:51:26.067",
      "published": "2022-10-17T13:15:10.633",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cna@vuldb.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-3555\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2022-10-17T13:15:10.633\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T03:51:26.067\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.