cve-2021-35936
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-08-16 07:25
Modified
2024-08-04 00:40
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow < 2.1.2.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Apache Software Foundation | Apache Airflow |
Version: Apache Airflow < 2.1.2 |
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "Apache Airflow", vendor: "Apache Software Foundation", versions: [ { lessThan: "2.1.2", status: "affected", version: "Apache Airflow", versionType: "custom", }, ], }, ], credits: [ { lang: "en", value: "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue.", }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow < 2.1.2.", }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-200", description: "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2021-08-16T07:25:11", orgId: "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", shortName: "apache", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", }, ], source: { discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, title: "No Authentication on Logging Server", workarounds: [ { lang: "en", value: "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc.", }, ], x_generator: { engine: "Vulnogram 0.0.9", }, x_legacyV4Record: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security@apache.org", ID: "CVE-2021-35936", STATE: "PUBLIC", TITLE: "No Authentication on Logging Server", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "Apache Airflow", version: { version_data: [ { version_affected: "<", version_name: "Apache Airflow", version_value: "2.1.2", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "Apache Software Foundation", }, ], }, }, credit: [ { lang: "eng", value: "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue.", }, ], data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow < 2.1.2.", }, ], }, generator: { engine: "Vulnogram 0.0.9", }, impact: [ {}, ], problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", }, ], }, source: { discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, work_around: [ { lang: "en", value: "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc.", }, ], }, }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", assignerShortName: "apache", cveId: "CVE-2021-35936", datePublished: "2021-08-16T07:25:11", dateReserved: "2021-06-29T00:00:00", dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-35936\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2021-08-16T08:15:11.530\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:12:47.057\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow < 2.1.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Si no es usado el registro remoto, el trabajador (en el caso de CeleryExecutor) o el planificador (en el caso de LocalExecutor) ejecuta un servidor de registro Flask y está escuchando en un puerto específico y también se vincula en 0.0.0.0 por defecto. Este servidor de registro no presenta autenticación y permite leer los archivos de registro de los trabajos DAG. Este problema afecta a Apache Airflow versiones anteriores a 2.1.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-306\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"410C1DAD-EE40-4F94-8DF6-25B94961F5FD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}", }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.