CVE-2019-9861 (GCVE-0-2019-9861)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-05-14 16:03 – Updated: 2024-08-04 22:01
VLAI
Summary
Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.
Severity
8.1 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2019-05-02 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:01:55.030Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "20190503 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20190504 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2019-05-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2019-05-14T16:03:38.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "20190503 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20190504 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-9861",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "20190503 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20190504 [SYSS-2019-005]: ABUS Secvest - Proximity Key - Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310)",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2019-9861",
    "datePublished": "2019-05-14T16:03:38.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2019-03-18T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:01:55.030Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2019-9861",
      "date": "2026-06-24",
      "epss": "0.01592",
      "percentile": "0.7254"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:abus:secvest_wireless_alarm_system_fuaa50000_firmware:3.01.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"3C5A31E7-5281-4EDC-9CC5-A887857BB6B7\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:abus:secvest_wireless_alarm_system_fuaa50000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"CD534B70-3FA6-4712-A30E-A9BEEB9A91CB\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Producto del uso de una tecnolog\\u00eda RFID no segura (MIFARE Classic), las claves de chip de proximidad ABUS (tokens RFID) del sistema de alarma inalambrico de ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 pueden clonarse f\\u00e1cilmente y utilizarse para desactivar el sistema de alarma de forma no autorizada.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2019-9861",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:52:27.510",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 5.2}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"accessVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 6.5, \"impactScore\": 4.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2019-05-14T17:29:08.397",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-310\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-9861\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2019-05-14T17:29:08.397\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:52:27.510\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Producto del uso de una tecnolog\u00eda RFID no segura (MIFARE Classic), las claves de chip de proximidad ABUS (tokens RFID) del sistema de alarma inalambrico de ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 pueden clonarse f\u00e1cilmente y utilizarse para desactivar el sistema de alarma de forma no autorizada.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"accessVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":6.5,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-310\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:abus:secvest_wireless_alarm_system_fuaa50000_firmware:3.01.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3C5A31E7-5281-4EDC-9CC5-A887857BB6B7\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:abus:secvest_wireless_alarm_system_fuaa50000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CD534B70-3FA6-4712-A30E-A9BEEB9A91CB\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152714/ABUS-Secvest-3.01.01-Cryptographic-Issues.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/May/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-005.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.