cve-2019-11774
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-09-12 17:25
Modified
2024-08-04 23:03
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
emo@eclipse.org | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192 | Patch, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192 | Patch, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
▼ | The Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse OMR |
Version: unspecified < 0.1 |
|
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T23:03:32.812Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Eclipse OMR", "vendor": "The Eclipse Foundation", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "0.1", "status": "affected", "version": "unspecified", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-367", "description": "CWE-367", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2019-09-12T17:25:54", "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c", "shortName": "eclipse" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org", "ID": "CVE-2019-11774", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Eclipse OMR", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_value": "0.1" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-367" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c", "assignerShortName": "eclipse", "cveId": "CVE-2019-11774", "datePublished": "2019-09-12T17:25:54", "dateReserved": "2019-05-06T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T23:03:32.812Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-11774\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2019-09-12T18:15:11.850\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:21:46.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Prior to 0.1, all builds of Eclipse OMR contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Anterior a la versi\u00f3n 0.1, todas las compilaciones de Eclipse OMR contienen un bug donde el versionador de bucle puede no privatizar un valor que se extrae del bucle para versionado, por ejemplo, si existe una condici\u00f3n que es movida fuera del bucle que lee un campo no podemos privatizar el valor de ese campo en la copia modificada del bucle, permitiendo que la prueba vea un valor del campo y, posteriormente, que el bucle visualice un valor de campo modificado sin volver a probar la condici\u00f3n eliminada del bucle. Esto puede conllevar a una variedad de problemas diferentes, pero una lectura fuera de los l\u00edmites de la matriz es una consecuencia importante de estos problemas.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-367\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-367\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:omr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"71061028-5218-4D4B-8CAB-066BA2E9F2DB\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549192\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.