cve-2016-9800
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-12-03 06:28
Modified
2024-08-06 02:59
Severity ?
Summary
In BlueZ 5.42, a buffer overflow was observed in "pin_code_reply_dump" function in "tools/parser/hci.c" source file. The issue exists because "pin" array is overflowed by supplied parameter due to lack of boundary checks on size of the buffer from frame "pin_code_reply_cp *cp" parameter.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:59:03.441Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "94652",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94652"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2016-12-03T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In BlueZ 5.42, a buffer overflow was observed in \"pin_code_reply_dump\" function in \"tools/parser/hci.c\" source file. The issue exists because \"pin\" array is overflowed by supplied parameter due to lack of boundary checks on size of the buffer from frame \"pin_code_reply_cp *cp\" parameter."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2016-12-06T10:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "94652",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94652"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-9800",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "In BlueZ 5.42, a buffer overflow was observed in \"pin_code_reply_dump\" function in \"tools/parser/hci.c\" source file. The issue exists because \"pin\" array is overflowed by supplied parameter due to lack of boundary checks on size of the buffer from frame \"pin_code_reply_cp *cp\" parameter."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "94652",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94652"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-9800",
    "datePublished": "2016-12-03T06:28:00",
    "dateReserved": "2016-12-03T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:59:03.441Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-9800\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2016-12-03T06:59:05.137\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:01:45.410\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In BlueZ 5.42, a buffer overflow was observed in \\\"pin_code_reply_dump\\\" function in \\\"tools/parser/hci.c\\\" source file. The issue exists because \\\"pin\\\" array is overflowed by supplied parameter due to lack of boundary checks on size of the buffer from frame \\\"pin_code_reply_cp *cp\\\" parameter.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En BlueZ 5.42, se ha observado un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en la funci\u00f3n \\\"pin_code_reply_dump\\\" en la fuente de archivo \\\"tools/parser/hci.c\\\". El problema existe debido a que el \\\"pin\\\" se desborda por el par\u00e1metro subministrado debido a la falta de controles de l\u00edmites en el tama\u00f1o del b\u00fafer del par\u00e1metro frame \\\"pin_code_reply_cp * cp\\\".\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":true,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bluez:bluez:5.42:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"196663D8-4181-4806-9944-0C60F9402CCA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94652\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94652\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg68892.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.