cve-2016-8632
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-11-28 03:01
Modified
2024-08-06 02:27
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
0.10% (0.29168)
Summary
The tipc_msg_build function in net/tipc/msg.c in the Linux kernel through 4.8.11 does not validate the relationship between the minimum fragment length and the maximum packet size, which allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-06T02:27:41.113Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  name: "[oss-security] 20161108 CVE-2016-8632 -- Linux kernel: tipc_msg_build() doesn't validate MTU that can trigger heap overflow",
                  tags: [
                     "mailing-list",
                     "x_refsource_MLIST",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/08/5",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390832",
               },
               {
                  name: "94211",
                  tags: [
                     "vdb-entry",
                     "x_refsource_BID",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94211",
               },
               {
                  name: "[netdev] 20161018 [PATCH net] tipc: Guard against tiny MTU in tipc_msg_build()",
                  tags: [
                     "mailing-list",
                     "x_refsource_MLIST",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev%40vger.kernel.org/msg133205.html",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "n/a",
               vendor: "n/a",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "n/a",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         datePublic: "2016-11-08T00:00:00",
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "The tipc_msg_build function in net/tipc/msg.c in the Linux kernel through 4.8.11 does not validate the relationship between the minimum fragment length and the maximum packet size, which allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability.",
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     description: "n/a",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "text",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2016-11-28T10:57:02",
            orgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
            shortName: "redhat",
         },
         references: [
            {
               name: "[oss-security] 20161108 CVE-2016-8632 -- Linux kernel: tipc_msg_build() doesn't validate MTU that can trigger heap overflow",
               tags: [
                  "mailing-list",
                  "x_refsource_MLIST",
               ],
               url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/08/5",
            },
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
               ],
               url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390832",
            },
            {
               name: "94211",
               tags: [
                  "vdb-entry",
                  "x_refsource_BID",
               ],
               url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94211",
            },
            {
               name: "[netdev] 20161018 [PATCH net] tipc: Guard against tiny MTU in tipc_msg_build()",
               tags: [
                  "mailing-list",
                  "x_refsource_MLIST",
               ],
               url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev%40vger.kernel.org/msg133205.html",
            },
         ],
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
      assignerShortName: "redhat",
      cveId: "CVE-2016-8632",
      datePublished: "2016-11-28T03:01:00",
      dateReserved: "2016-10-12T00:00:00",
      dateUpdated: "2024-08-06T02:27:41.113Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-8632\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2016-11-28T03:59:04.920\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-12T10:46:40.837\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The tipc_msg_build function in net/tipc/msg.c in the Linux kernel through 4.8.11 does not validate the relationship between the minimum fragment length and the maximum packet size, which allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La función tipc_msg_build en net/tipc/msg.c en el kernel Linux hasta la versión 4.8.11 no valida la relación entre la longitud mínima de fragmento y el tamaño máximo de paquete, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios o provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica) aprovechando la capacidad CAP_NET_ADMIN.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.2,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-264\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.6.16\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.2.85\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C213A3C5-CC01-4DE9-9C8B-2F6AE23DE77B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.3\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.16.40\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6C5B0F97-B38C-412B-93E9-148AC6F6B58E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.17\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.1.37\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B5B1E7DA-A662-40FC-A91A-E7B7273F1B93\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.2\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.4.65\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68BF7913-3500-47F8-9563-A09C85A2BC6F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.5\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.8.14\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2454EAB6-FC42-4FA4-BE76-CBAA81D4ADC4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/08/5\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94211\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390832\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev%40vger.kernel.org/msg133205.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/08/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94211\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390832\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev%40vger.kernel.org/msg133205.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.