CVE-2015-1777 (GCVE-0-2015-1777)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-04-12 15:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 04:54
VLAI?
Summary
rhnreg_ks in Red Hat Network Client Tools (aka rhn-client-tools) on Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 and Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6, and 7 does not properly validate hostnames in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows remote attackers to prevent system registration via a man-in-the-middle attack.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T04:54:15.986Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "72943",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20150304 Another Python app (rhn-setup: rhnreg_ks) not checking hostnames in certs properly CVE-2015-1777",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-03-04T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "rhnreg_ks in Red Hat Network Client Tools (aka rhn-client-tools) on Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 and Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6, and 7 does not properly validate hostnames in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows remote attackers to prevent system registration via a man-in-the-middle attack."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-04-12T14:57:01",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "72943",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20150304 Another Python app (rhn-setup: rhnreg_ks) not checking hostnames in certs properly CVE-2015-1777",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-1777",
    "datePublished": "2018-04-12T15:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2015-02-17T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T04:54:15.986Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:rhn-client-tools:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"4A06CC31-3043-4C6D-B34B-F1C46128D6F7\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:gluster_storage:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5B45F8E4-0E7A-4D55-84C2-5BE5B6335269\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"1D8B549B-E57B-4DFE-8A13-CAB06B5356B3\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"2F6AB192-9D7D-4A9A-8995-E53A9DE9EAFC\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"142AD0DD-4CF3-4D74-9442-459CE3347E3A\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"rhnreg_ks in Red Hat Network Client Tools (aka rhn-client-tools) on Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 and Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6, and 7 does not properly validate hostnames in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows remote attackers to prevent system registration via a man-in-the-middle attack.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"rhnreg_ks en Red Hat Network Client Tools (tambi\\u00e9n conocido como rhn-client-tools) en Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 y Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6 y 7 no valida correctamente los nombres de host en los certificados X.509 de los servidores SSL. Esto puede permitir que atacantes remotos eviten el registro en el sistema mediante un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM).\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2015-1777",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:26:06.503",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2018-04-12T15:29:00.333",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-1777\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-04-12T15:29:00.333\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:26:06.503\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"rhnreg_ks in Red Hat Network Client Tools (aka rhn-client-tools) on Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 and Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6, and 7 does not properly validate hostnames in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows remote attackers to prevent system registration via a man-in-the-middle attack.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"rhnreg_ks en Red Hat Network Client Tools (tambi\u00e9n conocido como rhn-client-tools) en Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 y Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6 y 7 no valida correctamente los nombres de host en los certificados X.509 de los servidores SSL. Esto puede permitir que atacantes remotos eviten el registro en el sistema mediante un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM).\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:rhn-client-tools:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4A06CC31-3043-4C6D-B34B-F1C46128D6F7\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:gluster_storage:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5B45F8E4-0E7A-4D55-84C2-5BE5B6335269\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1D8B549B-E57B-4DFE-8A13-CAB06B5356B3\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2F6AB192-9D7D-4A9A-8995-E53A9DE9EAFC\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"142AD0DD-4CF3-4D74-9442-459CE3347E3A\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/04/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72943\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198740\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.