CVE-2012-3977 (GCVE-0-2012-3977)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2012-10-09 10:00 – Updated: 2013-11-02 09:00
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4930. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-4930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-11-02T09:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4930.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-4930.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4930 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-3977",
    "datePublished": "2012-10-09T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2013-11-02T09:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-07-11T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2013-11-02T09:00:00.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4930.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-4930.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4930 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2012-3977",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:11:41.997",
      "published": "2012-10-09T11:13:09.690",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-3977\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2012-10-09T11:13:09.690\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:11:41.997\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-4930.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-4930.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-4930 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2025-11-21T16:22:28+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2012-3977",
      "id": "CVE-2012-3977",
      "initial_release_date": "2012-09-22T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "3",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Mozilla: SPDY information disclosure (MFSA 2012-73)",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2012/cve-2012-3977.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.