CVE-2009-3297 (GCVE-0-2009-3297)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2010-03-02T18:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789.  Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs.  Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2009-3297",
    "datePublished": "2010-03-02T18:00:00Z",
    "dateRejected": "2022-10-03T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2009-09-22T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T19:14:19.755Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2009-3297\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2010-03-02T18:30:00.570\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:04:24.810\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789.  Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs.  Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.