CNVD-2026-33601
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2026-08-26
VLAI
Title
Tenda G0堆栈缓冲区溢出漏洞
Description
Tenda G0是中国Tenda公司的一个路由器。
Tenda G0存在堆栈缓冲区溢出漏洞,该漏洞源于formSetDebugCfgr函数中未能正确处理enable等参数,导致栈缓冲区写入越界,攻击者可利用该漏洞通过构造的HTTP请求触发拒绝服务(DoS)。
Severity
高
Formal description
目前厂商尚未发布升级程序修复该安全问题,详情见厂商官网: https://www.tenda.com.cn/
Reference
https://github.com/xhh0124/SemVulLLM/tree/main/G0/formSetDebugCfg
Impacted products
| Name | Tenda G0 15.11.0.5 |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2026-36798",
"cveUrl": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-36798"
}
},
"description": "Tenda G0\u662f\u4e2d\u56fdTenda\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u8def\u7531\u5668\u3002\n\nTenda G0\u5b58\u5728\u5806\u6808\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8eformSetDebugCfgr\u51fd\u6570\u4e2d\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u5904\u7406enable\u7b49\u53c2\u6570\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u6808\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u5199\u5165\u8d8a\u754c\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u901a\u8fc7\u6784\u9020\u7684HTTP\u8bf7\u6c42\u89e6\u53d1\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08DoS\uff09\u3002",
"formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8be6\u60c5\u89c1\u5382\u5546\u5b98\u7f51\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.tenda.com.cn/",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2026-33601",
"openTime": "2026-08-26",
"products": {
"product": "Tenda G0 15.11.0.5"
},
"referenceLink": "https://github.com/xhh0124/SemVulLLM/tree/main/G0/formSetDebugCfg",
"serverity": "\u9ad8",
"submitTime": "2026-06-11",
"title": "Tenda G0\u5806\u6808\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…