GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CNVD-2019-02505

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2019-01-23
VLAI
Title
Red Hat 389-ds-base拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2019-02505)
Description
Red Hat 389-ds-base是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一个包括了Linux目录服务器和服务器管理命令行程序的软件包。 Red Hat 389-ds-base 1.3.7.10及之前版本、1.3.8.8及之前版本和1.4.0.16及之前版本中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于在重新打开日志文件时,程序未能正确的使用控制错误日志的锁。攻击者可通过发送大量的更改命令利用该漏洞造成slapd崩溃。
Severity
Formal description

目前厂商暂未发布修复措施解决此安全问题,建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商主页或参考网址以获取解决办法: https://www.redhat.com/

Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14624
Impacted products
Name
['Red Hat 389-ds-base <=1.3.7.10', 'Red Hat 389-ds-base <=1.3.8.8', 'Red Hat 389-ds-base <=1.4.0.16']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2018-14624",
      "cveUrl": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14624"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u5305\u62ec\u4e86Linux\u76ee\u5f55\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u548c\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u7ba1\u7406\u547d\u4ee4\u884c\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u8f6f\u4ef6\u5305\u3002\n\nRed Hat 389-ds-base 1.3.7.10\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u30011.3.8.8\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u548c1.4.0.16\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u5728\u91cd\u65b0\u6253\u5f00\u65e5\u5fd7\u6587\u4ef6\u65f6\uff0c\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u7684\u4f7f\u7528\u63a7\u5236\u9519\u8bef\u65e5\u5fd7\u7684\u9501\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u5927\u91cf\u7684\u66f4\u6539\u547d\u4ee4\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210slapd\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Pedro Sampaio",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u6682\u672a\u53d1\u5e03\u4fee\u590d\u63aa\u65bd\u89e3\u51b3\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u5efa\u8bae\u4f7f\u7528\u6b64\u8f6f\u4ef6\u7684\u7528\u6237\u968f\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u6216\u53c2\u8003\u7f51\u5740\u4ee5\u83b7\u53d6\u89e3\u51b3\u529e\u6cd5\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.redhat.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2019-02505",
  "openTime": "2019-01-23",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Red Hat 389-ds-base \u003c=1.3.7.10",
      "Red Hat 389-ds-base \u003c=1.3.8.8",
      "Red Hat 389-ds-base \u003c=1.4.0.16"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14624",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2018-09-12",
  "title": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2019-02505\uff09"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…