Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2017-38306

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-12-28

Title

多款设备Samsung 850 Pro、PM851固态硬盘、Seagate ST500LT015和ST500LT025硬盘强制重启攻击漏洞

Description

Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptop是中国联想（Lenovo）公司的一款笔记本电脑。Dell Latitude E6410 laptop是美国戴尔（Dell）公司的一款笔记本电脑。Samsung 850 Pro等都是使用在笔记本电脑中的硬盘。Samsung 850 Pro是韩国三星（Samsung）公司生产的硬盘。Seagate ST500LT015是美国希捷（Seagate）公司生产的硬盘。多款设备上的Samsung 850 Pro、PM851固态硬盘、Seagate ST500LT015和ST500LT025硬盘中存在安全漏洞。物理位置临近的攻击者可通过实施强制重启攻击利用该漏洞绕过自我加密硬盘保护。

Severity

低

Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案，请关注厂商主页及时更新： http://www.samsung.com/cn/

Reference

https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf

Impacted products

Name
['Samsung 850 Pro', 'Samsung PM851', 'Seagate Technology ST500LT015', 'Seagate Technology ST500LT025']

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-7268"
    }
  },
  "description": "Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptop\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd\u8054\u60f3\uff08Lenovo\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u3002Dell Latitude E6410 laptop\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u6234\u5c14\uff08Dell\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u3002Samsung 850 Pro\u7b49\u90fd\u662f\u4f7f\u7528\u5728\u7b14\u8bb0\u672c\u7535\u8111\u4e2d\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002Samsung 850 Pro\u662f\u97e9\u56fd\u4e09\u661f\uff08Samsung\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u751f\u4ea7\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002Seagate ST500LT015\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u5e0c\u6377\uff08Seagate\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u751f\u4ea7\u7684\u786c\u76d8\u3002\r\n\r\n\u591a\u6b3e\u8bbe\u5907\u4e0a\u7684Samsung 850 Pro\u3001PM851\u56fa\u6001\u786c\u76d8\u3001Seagate ST500LT015\u548cST500LT025\u786c\u76d8\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u7269\u7406\u4f4d\u7f6e\u4e34\u8fd1\u7684\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u5b9e\u65bd\u5f3a\u5236\u91cd\u542f\u653b\u51fb\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u81ea\u6211\u52a0\u5bc6\u786c\u76d8\u4fdd\u62a4\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknwon",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.samsung.com/cn/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-38306",
  "openTime": "2017-12-28",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Samsung 850 Pro",
      "Samsung PM851",
      "Seagate Technology ST500LT015",
      "Seagate Technology ST500LT025"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
  "serverity": "\u4f4e",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-29",
  "title": "\u591a\u6b3e\u8bbe\u5907Samsung 850 Pro\u3001PM851\u56fa\u6001\u786c\u76d8\u3001Seagate ST500LT015\u548cST500LT025\u786c\u76d8\u5f3a\u5236\u91cd\u542f\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2015-7268 (GCVE-0-2015-7268)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-11-27 22:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 07:43

Summary

Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a "Forced Restart Attack."

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

Assigner

certcc CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard E 42/100 over 154 records in the last 180 days details

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encrypt…	x_refsource_MISC
https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-…	x_refsource_MISC

Date Public

2015-11-02 00:00

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.131Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\""
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-11-27T21:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-7268",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-7268",
    "datePublished": "2017-11-27T22:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-09-18T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.131Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted