cnvd - cnvd-2017-36161

cnvd-2017-36161

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: Redis跨站脚本漏洞

Description:

Redis是美国Redis Labs公司赞助的一套开源的使用ANSI C编写、支持网络、可基于内存亦可持久化的日志型、键值（Key-Value）存储数据库，并提供多种语言的API。

Redis 3.2.7之前的版本中的networking.c文件存在跨站脚本漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞在浏览器中执行任意的脚本代码。

Severity: 中

Patch Name: Redis跨站脚本漏洞的补丁

Patch Description:

Redis 3.2.7之前的版本中的networking.c文件存在跨站脚本漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞在浏览器中执行任意的脚本代码。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description:

厂商已发布了漏洞修复程序，请及时关注更新： https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/

Reference: https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50

Impacted products

Name
Redis Labs Redis <3.2.7

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "101572"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-10517"
    }
  },
  "description": "Redis\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdRedis Labs\u516c\u53f8\u8d5e\u52a9\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u4f7f\u7528ANSI C\u7f16\u5199\u3001\u652f\u6301\u7f51\u7edc\u3001\u53ef\u57fa\u4e8e\u5185\u5b58\u4ea6\u53ef\u6301\u4e45\u5316\u7684\u65e5\u5fd7\u578b\u3001\u952e\u503c\uff08Key-Value\uff09\u5b58\u50a8\u6570\u636e\u5e93\uff0c\u5e76\u63d0\u4f9b\u591a\u79cd\u8bed\u8a00\u7684API\u3002\r\n\r\nRedis 3.2.7\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684networking.c\u6587\u4ef6\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5728\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u7684\u811a\u672c\u4ee3\u7801\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Redis Labs",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-36161",
  "openTime": "2017-12-05",
  "patchDescription": "Redis\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdRedis Labs\u516c\u53f8\u8d5e\u52a9\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u4f7f\u7528ANSI C\u7f16\u5199\u3001\u652f\u6301\u7f51\u7edc\u3001\u53ef\u57fa\u4e8e\u5185\u5b58\u4ea6\u53ef\u6301\u4e45\u5316\u7684\u65e5\u5fd7\u578b\u3001\u952e\u503c\uff08Key-Value\uff09\u5b58\u50a8\u6570\u636e\u5e93\uff0c\u5e76\u63d0\u4f9b\u591a\u79cd\u8bed\u8a00\u7684API\u3002\r\n\r\nRedis 3.2.7\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684networking.c\u6587\u4ef6\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5728\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u4e2d\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u7684\u811a\u672c\u4ee3\u7801\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Redis\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Redis Labs Redis \u003c3.2.7"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-01",
  "title": "Redis\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2016-10517 (GCVE-0-2016-10517)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2017-10-24 18:00

Modified

2024-08-06 03:21

Severity ?

CWE

Summary

networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/	x_refsource_MISC
	https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572	vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
	https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T03:21:52.170Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
          },
          {
            "name": "101572",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-10-24T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port)."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-10-26T09:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
        },
        {
          "name": "101572",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-10517",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port)."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
            },
            {
              "name": "101572",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-10517",
    "datePublished": "2017-10-24T18:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2017-10-24T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T03:21:52.170Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted