CNVD-2016-07357

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-09-08
VLAI
Title
Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise拒绝服务漏洞（CNVD-2016-07357）
Description
Red Hat OpenShift是美国红帽（Red Hat）公司的一款平台即服务（PaaS）云计算平台。OpenShift Enterprise是一个开源的私有云版本。 Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1和3.2版本中的Minimatch存在拒绝服务漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务（消耗大量的CPU)。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise拒绝服务漏洞（CNVD-2016-07357）的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat OpenShift是美国红帽（Red Hat）公司的一款平台即服务（PaaS）云计算平台。OpenShift Enterprise是一个开源的私有云版本。 Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1和3.2版本中的Minimatch存在拒绝服务漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务（消耗大量的CPU)。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题，补丁获取链接： https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1605

Reference
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1605 http://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=37678 http://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=37598 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138294/Red-Hat-Security-Advisory-2016-1605-01.html
Impacted products
Name
['Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1 x86_64', 'Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.2 x86_64']
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-1000023"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat OpenShift\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u5e73\u53f0\u5373\u670d\u52a1\uff08PaaS\uff09\u4e91\u8ba1\u7b97\u5e73\u53f0\u3002OpenShift Enterprise\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u79c1\u6709\u4e91\u7248\u672c\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1\u548c3.2\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684Minimatch\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6d88\u8017\u5927\u91cf\u7684CPU)\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1605",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-07357",
  "openTime": "2016-09-08",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat OpenShift\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u5e73\u53f0\u5373\u670d\u52a1\uff08PaaS\uff09\u4e91\u8ba1\u7b97\u5e73\u53f0\u3002OpenShift Enterprise\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u79c1\u6709\u4e91\u7248\u672c\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1\u548c3.2\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684Minimatch\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6d88\u8017\u5927\u91cf\u7684CPU)\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2016-07357\uff09\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.1 x86_64",
      "Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 3.2 x86_64"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1605\thttp://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=37678\thttp://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=37598\thttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138294/Red-Hat-Security-Advisory-2016-1605-01.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-09-08",
  "title": "Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2016-07357\uff09"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.