cnvd - cnvd-2016-02735

cnvd-2016-02735

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: HexChat-GNOME中间人攻击漏洞

Description:

HexChat（前称XChat-WDK）、XChat和XChat-GNOME都是IRC（（一种通过网络的即时聊天方式））通讯软件。

HexChat 2.10.2之前的版本的XChat,XChat-GNOME存在中间人攻击漏洞，使得中间人攻击者通过任意有效的证书恶搞SSL服务器。

Severity: 中

Patch Name: HexChat-GNOME中间人攻击漏洞的补丁

Patch Description:

HexChat（前称XChat-WDK）、XChat和XChat-GNOME都是IRC（（一种通过网络的即时聊天方式））通讯软件。

HexChat 2.10.2之前的版本的XChat,XChat-GNOME存在中间人攻击漏洞，使得中间人攻击者通过任意有效的证书恶搞SSL服务器。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description:

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全公告获取补丁以修复该漏洞： http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1

Reference: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1

Impacted products

Name
Hexchat HexChat <2.10.2

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2013-7449"
    }
  },
  "description": "HexChat\uff08\u524d\u79f0XChat-WDK\uff09\u3001XChat\u548cXChat-GNOME\u90fd\u662fIRC\uff08\uff08\u4e00\u79cd\u901a\u8fc7\u7f51\u7edc\u7684\u5373\u65f6\u804a\u5929\u65b9\u5f0f\uff09\uff09\u901a\u8baf\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\nHexChat 2.10.2\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u7684XChat,XChat-GNOME\u5b58\u5728\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7f\u5f97\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u4efb\u610f\u6709\u6548\u7684\u8bc1\u4e66\u6076\u641eSSL\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknown",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u83b7\u53d6\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-02735",
  "openTime": "2016-05-05",
  "patchDescription": "HexChat\uff08\u524d\u79f0XChat-WDK\uff09\u3001XChat\u548cXChat-GNOME\u90fd\u662fIRC\uff08\uff08\u4e00\u79cd\u901a\u8fc7\u7f51\u7edc\u7684\u5373\u65f6\u804a\u5929\u65b9\u5f0f\uff09\uff09\u901a\u8baf\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\nHexChat 2.10.2\u4e4b\u524d\u7684\u7248\u672c\u7684XChat,XChat-GNOME\u5b58\u5728\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7f\u5f97\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u901a\u8fc7\u4efb\u610f\u6709\u6548\u7684\u8bc1\u4e66\u6076\u641eSSL\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "HexChat-GNOME\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Hexchat HexChat  \u003c2.10.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-04-28",
  "title": "HexChat-GNOME\u4e2d\u95f4\u4eba\u653b\u51fb\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2013-7449 (GCVE-0-2013-7449)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2016-04-21 14:00

Modified

2024-08-06 18:09

Severity ?

CWE

Summary

The ssl_do_connect function in common/server.c in HexChat before 2.10.2, XChat, and XChat-GNOME does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d	x_refsource_CONFIRM
	http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1	vendor-advisory, x_refsource_UBUNTU
	https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524	x_refsource_CONFIRM
	http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html	x_refsource_CONFIRM
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839	x_refsource_CONFIRM

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:09:16.618Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d"
          },
          {
            "name": "USN-2945-1",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_UBUNTU",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2013-04-09T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The ssl_do_connect function in common/server.c in HexChat before 2.10.2, XChat, and XChat-GNOME does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2016-04-21T12:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d"
        },
        {
          "name": "USN-2945-1",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_UBUNTU"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2013-7449",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The ssl_do_connect function in common/server.c in HexChat before 2.10.2, XChat, and XChat-GNOME does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a4910a7e02d"
            },
            {
              "name": "USN-2945-1",
              "refsource": "UBUNTU",
              "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2945-1"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2013-7449",
    "datePublished": "2016-04-21T14:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2016-04-06T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:09:16.618Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted