CNVD-2016-02681

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-05-04
VLAI Severity ?
Title
OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder内存破坏漏洞
Description
OpenSSL是一个实现安全套接层和安全传输层协议的通用开源加密库，可支持多种加密算法，包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder存在内存破坏漏洞。当应用程序反序列化包含信任的ASN.1结构，攻击者利用漏洞可引发越界写，进而可导致内存破坏，执行任意代码。
Severity
高
Patch Name
OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder内存破坏漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
OpenSSL是一个实现安全套接层和安全传输层协议的通用开源加密库，可支持多种加密算法，包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder存在内存破坏漏洞。当应用程序反序列化包含信任的ASN.1结构，攻击者利用漏洞可引发越界写，进而可导致内存破坏。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

厂商已发布了升级版本，请及时更新下载： https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html

Reference
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt
Impacted products
Name
['Openssl Openssl 1.0.1', 'OpenSSL OpenSSL 1.0.2']
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-2108"
    }
  },
  "description": "OpenSSL\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5b9e\u73b0\u5b89\u5168\u5957\u63a5\u5c42\u548c\u5b89\u5168\u4f20\u8f93\u5c42\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u901a\u7528\u5f00\u6e90\u52a0\u5bc6\u5e93\uff0c\u53ef\u652f\u6301\u591a\u79cd\u52a0\u5bc6\u7b97\u6cd5\uff0c\u5305\u62ec\u5bf9\u79f0\u5bc6\u7801\u3001\u54c8\u5e0c\u7b97\u6cd5\u3001\u5b89\u5168\u6563\u5217\u7b97\u6cd5\u7b49\u3002\r\n\r\nOpenSSL ASN.1 encoder\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316\u5305\u542b\u4fe1\u4efb\u7684ASN.1\u7ed3\u6784\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5f15\u53d1\u8d8a\u754c\u5199\uff0c\u8fdb\u800c\u53ef\u5bfc\u81f4\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\uff0c\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002",
  "discovererName": "David Benjamin",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u7248\u672c\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\u4e0b\u8f7d\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-02681",
  "openTime": "2016-05-04",
  "patchDescription": "OpenSSL\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5b9e\u73b0\u5b89\u5168\u5957\u63a5\u5c42\u548c\u5b89\u5168\u4f20\u8f93\u5c42\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u901a\u7528\u5f00\u6e90\u52a0\u5bc6\u5e93\uff0c\u53ef\u652f\u6301\u591a\u79cd\u52a0\u5bc6\u7b97\u6cd5\uff0c\u5305\u62ec\u5bf9\u79f0\u5bc6\u7801\u3001\u54c8\u5e0c\u7b97\u6cd5\u3001\u5b89\u5168\u6563\u5217\u7b97\u6cd5\u7b49\u3002\r\n\r\nOpenSSL ASN.1 encoder\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u53cd\u5e8f\u5217\u5316\u5305\u542b\u4fe1\u4efb\u7684ASN.1\u7ed3\u6784\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5f15\u53d1\u8d8a\u754c\u5199\uff0c\u8fdb\u800c\u53ef\u5bfc\u81f4\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Openssl Openssl 1.0.1",
      "OpenSSL OpenSSL  1.0.2"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2016-05-04",
  "title": "OpenSSL ASN.1 encoder\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.