cnvd-2016-02193
Vulnerability from cnvd
Title
Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc拒绝服务漏洞
Description
Red Hat Enterprise Linux（RHEL）是美国红帽（Red Hat）公司维护和发布的一套面向企业用户的Linux操作系统。 Red Hat Enterprise Linux（RHEL） 6.7版本和7.2版本的glibc程序包中的‘calloc’函数存在安全漏洞，该漏洞源于程序未能正确初始化内存空间。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务（挂起或崩溃）。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat Enterprise Linux（RHEL）是美国红帽（Red Hat）公司维护和发布的一套面向企业用户的Linux操作系统。 Red Hat Enterprise Linux（RHEL） 6.7版本和7.2版本的glibc程序包中的‘calloc’函数存在安全漏洞，该漏洞源于程序未能正确初始化内存空间。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务（挂起或崩溃）。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题，补丁获取链接： http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0176.html

Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256285
Impacted products
Name
['Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6。7', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7.2']
Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-5229"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7ef4\u62a4\u548c\u53d1\u5e03\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u9762\u5411\u4f01\u4e1a\u7528\u6237\u7684Linux\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09 6.7\u7248\u672c\u548c7.2\u7248\u672c\u7684glibc\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5305\u4e2d\u7684\u2018calloc\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u521d\u59cb\u5316\u5185\u5b58\u7a7a\u95f4\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6302\u8d77\u6216\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Florian Weimer\uff0c Josef Bacik",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0176.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-02193",
  "openTime": "2016-04-13",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7ef4\u62a4\u548c\u53d1\u5e03\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u9762\u5411\u4f01\u4e1a\u7528\u6237\u7684Linux\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09 6.7\u7248\u672c\u548c7.2\u7248\u672c\u7684glibc\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5305\u4e2d\u7684\u2018calloc\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u521d\u59cb\u5316\u5185\u5b58\u7a7a\u95f4\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6302\u8d77\u6216\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6\u30027",
      "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7.2"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256285",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-04-12",
  "title": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.