CNVD-2016-00792
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-02-03
VLAI
Title
NTP拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2016-00792)
Description
NTP是一种以数据包交换把两台电脑的时钟同步化的网络协议。
NTP存在安全漏洞,允许攻击者可通过发送恶意的广播数据包进行拒绝服务。
Severity
中
Patch Name
NTP拒绝服务漏洞(CNVD-2016-00792)的补丁
Patch Description
NTP是一种以数据包交换把两台电脑的时钟同步化的网络协议。
NTP存在安全漏洞,允许攻击者可通过发送恶意的广播数据包进行拒绝服务。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description
用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全补丁以修复该漏洞: http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#January_2016_NTP_4_2_8p6_Securit
Reference
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#January_2016_NTP_4_2_8p6_Securit
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81816
Impacted products
| Name | Ntp Ntp |
|---|
{
"bids": {
"bid": {
"bidNumber": "81816"
}
},
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2015-7979"
}
},
"description": "NTP\u662f\u4e00\u79cd\u4ee5\u6570\u636e\u5305\u4ea4\u6362\u628a\u4e24\u53f0\u7535\u8111\u7684\u65f6\u949f\u540c\u6b65\u5316\u7684\u7f51\u7edc\u534f\u8bae\u3002\r\n\r\nNTP\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u6076\u610f\u7684\u5e7f\u64ad\u6570\u636e\u5305\u8fdb\u884c\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002",
"discovererName": "Aanchal Malhotra of Boston University in collaboration with Cisco ASIG",
"formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttp://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#January_2016_NTP_4_2_8p6_Securit",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2016-00792",
"openTime": "2016-02-03",
"patchDescription": "NTP\u662f\u4e00\u79cd\u4ee5\u6570\u636e\u5305\u4ea4\u6362\u628a\u4e24\u53f0\u7535\u8111\u7684\u65f6\u949f\u540c\u6b65\u5316\u7684\u7f51\u7edc\u534f\u8bae\u3002\r\n\r\nNTP\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u6076\u610f\u7684\u5e7f\u64ad\u6570\u636e\u5305\u8fdb\u884c\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
"patchName": "NTP\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2016-00792\uff09\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
"products": {
"product": "Ntp Ntp"
},
"referenceLink": "http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#January_2016_NTP_4_2_8p6_Securit\r\nhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81816",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2016-01-30",
"title": "NTP\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CNVD-2016-00792\uff09"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.