cnvd-2015-07986
Vulnerability from cnvd
Title: OpenLDAP弱密码漏洞
Description:
OpenLDAP是美国OpenLDAP基金会的一个轻型目录访问协议(LDAP)的自由和开源实现,它已被包含在Linux发行版中。
OpenLDAP的libraries/libldap/tls_m.c文件中的‘nss_parse_ciphers’函数存在安全漏洞。由于程序未能正确解析OpenSSL-style multi-keyword模式的密码字符串。远程攻击者可通过发送特制的密码请求使程序使用弱密码。
Severity: 中
Formal description:
目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://www.openldap.org/
Reference: http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034221 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2131.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238322
Impacted products
Name | OpenLDAP OpenLDAP |
---|
{ "cves": { "cve": { "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-3276" } }, "description": "OpenLDAP\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdOpenLDAP\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u8f7b\u578b\u76ee\u5f55\u8bbf\u95ee\u534f\u8bae\uff08LDAP\uff09\u7684\u81ea\u7531\u548c\u5f00\u6e90\u5b9e\u73b0\uff0c\u5b83\u5df2\u88ab\u5305\u542b\u5728Linux\u53d1\u884c\u7248\u4e2d\u3002\r\n\r\nOpenLDAP\u7684libraries/libldap/tls_m.c\u6587\u4ef6\u4e2d\u7684\u2018nss_parse_ciphers\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u7531\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u89e3\u6790OpenSSL-style multi-keyword\u6a21\u5f0f\u7684\u5bc6\u7801\u5b57\u7b26\u4e32\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u5236\u7684\u5bc6\u7801\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f7f\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4f7f\u7528\u5f31\u5bc6\u7801\u3002", "discovererName": "Vasyl Kaigorodov", "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.openldap.org/", "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e", "number": "CNVD-2015-07986", "openTime": "2015-12-09", "products": { "product": "OpenLDAP OpenLDAP" }, "referenceLink": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034221 \r\nhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2131.html \r\nhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238322", "serverity": "\u4e2d", "submitTime": "2015-12-08", "title": "OpenLDAP\u5f31\u5bc6\u7801\u6f0f\u6d1e" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…