CNVD-2015-01968

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-03-25
VLAI Severity ?
Title
Codoforum过滤功能目录遍历漏洞
Description
Codoforum是一款论坛应用。 Codoforum过滤函数未能正确处理用户提交的PATH参数,允许攻击者进行目录遍历攻击,读取系统任意文件内容。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: https://codoforum.com/documentation/roadmap

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9261
Impacted products
Name
CODOFORUM Codoforum 2.5.1
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-9261"
    }
  },
  "description": "Codoforum\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u8bba\u575b\u5e94\u7528\u3002\r\n\r\nCodoforum\u8fc7\u6ee4\u51fd\u6570\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u5904\u7406\u7528\u6237\u63d0\u4ea4\u7684PATH\u53c2\u6570\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u8fdb\u884c\u76ee\u5f55\u904d\u5386\u653b\u51fb\uff0c\u8bfb\u53d6\u7cfb\u7edf\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\u5185\u5bb9\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Kacper Szurek",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttps://codoforum.com/documentation/roadmap",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-01968",
  "openTime": "2015-03-25",
  "products": {
    "product": "CODOFORUM Codoforum 2.5.1"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9261",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-03-24",
  "title": "Codoforum\u8fc7\u6ee4\u529f\u80fd\u76ee\u5f55\u904d\u5386\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…